Justice
December 5th 03, 07:37 AM
PCyr wrote:
> Sorry, I was talking about installing an additional
copy for private
> home use. Since the law says (1) that such a new copy
or adaptation
> is created as an essential step in the utilization of
the computer
> program in conjunction with a machine and that it is
used in no other
> manner.
>
How do you get "I was talking about installing an
additional copy for private home use."
From
"a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step
in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction
with a machine"
Unless you are translating this into your own idiotic
native language.
They have been having this conversation on these groups
for over 2 years now and you just upped the message count
by around 100.
If you really believe you are right, install your copy on
another system and when MS denies the activation, get
yourself an attorney and sue them. That is IF you really
believe this.
Otherwise, shut the **** up, idiot.
Justice
> Sorry, I was talking about installing an additional
copy for private
> home use. Since the law says (1) that such a new copy
or adaptation
> is created as an essential step in the utilization of
the computer
> program in conjunction with a machine and that it is
used in no other
> manner.
>
How do you get "I was talking about installing an
additional copy for private home use."
From
"a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step
in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction
with a machine"
Unless you are translating this into your own idiotic
native language.
They have been having this conversation on these groups
for over 2 years now and you just upped the message count
by around 100.
If you really believe you are right, install your copy on
another system and when MS denies the activation, get
yourself an attorney and sue them. That is IF you really
believe this.
Otherwise, shut the **** up, idiot.
Justice