New build? [Archive]

Disguised

March 18th 15, 11:16 AM

On 18-Mar-2015 05:50, philo wrote:
> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>
>
> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>
>
> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build" option
> even if I set my choice to "fast"

You can't try something that's not officially out yet.
And yes I know there's a leak version out there but I wouldn't touch
that with a barge pole.

Dave-UK

March 18th 15, 11:36 AM

"philo" > wrote in message ...
> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>
>
> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>
>
> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build" option
> even if I set my choice to "fast"

Don't waste time waiting for Microsoft to give it to you.
Download at full speed from here:
http://getintopc.com/softwares/operating-systems/windows-10-build-10036-free-download-iso-3264-bit/

philo

March 18th 15, 12:20 PM

On 03/18/2015 06:16 AM, Disguised wrote:
> On 18-Mar-2015 05:50, philo wrote:
>> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>>
>>
>> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>>
>>
>> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build" option
>> even if I set my choice to "fast"
>
> You can't try something that's not officially out yet.
> And yes I know there's a leak version out there but I wouldn't touch
> that with a barge pole.

I saw previously someone had installed 10031

I did not know they had a leaked version.

Nope, I don't want that

No Name

March 18th 15, 11:48 PM

philo > wrote:
> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>
>
> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>
>
> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build" option
> even if I set my choice to "fast"

I was in receipt of build 10041 this morning through Windows Update.

The only problem I'm experiencing so far is no Mail, Contacts or Calendar
was installed along with it as being operational. All I get for theses apps
when clicking on the related tile is no action and the tile has no usual
graphic and app name. From what I've seen, some of the files exist in the
specific folders for these apps, but they refuse to function as merely
brings up a window wanting me to select the requisite program to open but
the official app is non-existent.

philo

March 18th 15, 11:59 PM

On 03/18/2015 06:48 PM, wrote:
> philo > wrote:
>> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>>
>>
>> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>>
>>
>> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build" option
>> even if I set my choice to "fast"
>
> I was in receipt of build 10041 this morning through Windows Update.
>
> The only problem I'm experiencing so far is no Mail, Contacts or Calendar
> was installed along with it as being operational. All I get for theses apps
> when clicking on the related tile is no action and the tile has no usual
> graphic and app name. From what I've seen, some of the files exist in the
> specific folders for these apps, but they refuse to function as merely
> brings up a window wanting me to select the requisite program to open but
> the official app is non-existent.
>

Yep

tried later in the day and I am installing 10041 now

March 19th 15, 01:15 AM

On 03/18/2015 04:59 PM, philo wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 06:48 PM, wrote:
>> philo > wrote:
>>> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>>>
>>>
>>> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>>>
>>>
>>> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build" option
>>> even if I set my choice to "fast"
>>
>> I was in receipt of build 10041 this morning through Windows Update.
>>
>> The only problem I'm experiencing so far is no Mail, Contacts or Calendar
>> was installed along with it as being operational. All I get for theses
>> apps
>> when clicking on the related tile is no action and the tile has no usual
>> graphic and app name. From what I've seen, some of the files exist in the
>> specific folders for these apps, but they refuse to function as merely
>> brings up a window wanting me to select the requisite program to open but
>> the official app is non-existent.
>>
>
>
>
> Yep
>
> tried later in the day and I am installing 10041 now

Any sign of an ISO?

philo

March 19th 15, 06:18 AM

On 03/18/2015 08:15 PM, T wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 04:59 PM, philo wrote:
>> On 03/18/2015 06:48 PM, wrote:
>>> philo > wrote:
>>>> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build" option
>>>> even if I set my choice to "fast"
>>>
>>> I was in receipt of build 10041 this morning through Windows Update.
>>>
>>> The only problem I'm experiencing so far is no Mail, Contacts or
>>> Calendar
>>> was installed along with it as being operational. All I get for theses
>>> apps
>>> when clicking on the related tile is no action and the tile has no usual
>>> graphic and app name. From what I've seen, some of the files exist in
>>> the
>>> specific folders for these apps, but they refuse to function as merely
>>> brings up a window wanting me to select the requisite program to open
>>> but
>>> the official app is non-existent.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yep
>>
>> tried later in the day and I am installing 10041 now
>
>
> Any sign of an ISO?

Not that I saw

March 19th 15, 07:26 AM

On 03/18/2015 05:20 AM, philo wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 06:16 AM, Disguised wrote:
>> On 18-Mar-2015 05:50, philo wrote:
>>> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>>>
>>>
>>> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>>>
>>>
>>> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build" option
>>> even if I set my choice to "fast"
>>
>> You can't try something that's not officially out yet.
>> And yes I know there's a leak version out there but I wouldn't touch
>> that with a barge pole.
>
>
>
> I saw previously someone had installed 10031
>
> I did not know they had a leaked version.
>
>
> Nope, I don't want that

Hi All,

I am still on 9926 and wuapp.exe "check for updates" tells
I am up to date. Huh.

In Advanced (wuapp), I changed to "Fast" download build
options, pressed "check for updates" again, and now I
am downloading something large called "fbl_impressive 11041
Professional"

Hmmm. My download of 11041 is sitting at 0% and there is
no Internet traffic. Okay, I will restart tomorrow and
see what happens.

In the process of looking for updates, I forced a
reboot in the middle of some update. After reboot.
wuapp told me the update had been "interrupted" and did
I want to restart the update. I did and it did. I
have seen something like that bugger up w7, especially
with Dot Net updates. I was impressed.

-T

March 19th 15, 07:29 AM

On 03/19/2015 12:26 AM, T wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 05:20 AM, philo wrote:
>> On 03/18/2015 06:16 AM, Disguised wrote:
>>> On 18-Mar-2015 05:50, philo wrote:
>>>> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build" option
>>>> even if I set my choice to "fast"
>>>
>>> You can't try something that's not officially out yet.
>>> And yes I know there's a leak version out there but I wouldn't touch
>>> that with a barge pole.
>>
>>
>>
>> I saw previously someone had installed 10031
>>
>> I did not know they had a leaked version.
>>
>>
>> Nope, I don't want that
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am still on 9926 and wuapp.exe "check for updates" tells
> I am up to date. Huh.
>
> In Advanced (wuapp), I changed to "Fast" download build
> options, pressed "check for updates" again, and now I
> am downloading something large called "fbl_impressive 11041
> Professional"
>
> Hmmm. My download of 11041 is sitting at 0% and there is
> no Internet traffic. Okay, I will restart tomorrow and
> see what happens.
>
> In the process of looking for updates, I forced a
> reboot in the middle of some update. After reboot.
> wuapp told me the update had been "interrupted" and did
> I want to restart the update. I did and it did. I
> have seen something like that bugger up w7, especially
> with Dot Net updates. I was impressed.
>
> -T

And when I went to shut down, I was told that wuapp was
preventing my shutdown and I told it to do so anyway.

Hmmm. I gave me wuapp's icon, but not its name. That
needs improving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
icon.

Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
a wuapp shortcut on my desktop

Darklight

March 19th 15, 12:11 PM

T wrote:

> On 03/19/2015 12:26 AM, T wrote:
>> On 03/18/2015 05:20 AM, philo wrote:
>>> On 03/18/2015 06:16 AM, Disguised wrote:
>>>> On 18-Mar-2015 05:50, philo wrote:
>>>>> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build"
>>>>> option even if I set my choice to "fast"
>>>>
>>>> You can't try something that's not officially out yet.
>>>> And yes I know there's a leak version out there but I wouldn't touch
>>>> that with a barge pole.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I saw previously someone had installed 10031
>>>
>>> I did not know they had a leaked version.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nope, I don't want that
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am still on 9926 and wuapp.exe "check for updates" tells
>> I am up to date. Huh.
>>
>> In Advanced (wuapp), I changed to "Fast" download build
>> options, pressed "check for updates" again, and now I
>> am downloading something large called "fbl_impressive 11041
>> Professional"
>>
>> Hmmm. My download of 11041 is sitting at 0% and there is
>> no Internet traffic. Okay, I will restart tomorrow and
>> see what happens.
>>
>> In the process of looking for updates, I forced a
>> reboot in the middle of some update. After reboot.
>> wuapp told me the update had been "interrupted" and did
>> I want to restart the update. I did and it did. I
>> have seen something like that bugger up w7, especially
>> with Dot Net updates. I was impressed.
>>
>> -T
>
>
> And when I went to shut down, I was told that wuapp was
> preventing my shutdown and I told it to do so anyway.
>
> Hmmm. I gave me wuapp's icon, but not its name. That
> needs improving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
> icon.
>
> Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
> a wuapp shortcut on my desktop

looks like win10 is a dictatorship now they just don't get it.
there is still no choice. It's either you move forward with us
or ****off!

philo

March 19th 15, 12:45 PM

On 03/19/2015 02:29 AM, T wrote:
> ked version.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nope, I don't want that
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am still on 9926 and wuapp.exe "check for updates" tells
>> I am up to date. Huh.
>>
>> In Advanced (wuapp), I changed to "Fast" download build
>> options, pressed "check for updates" again, and now I
>> am downloading something large called "fbl_impressive 11041
>> Professional"
>>
>> Hmmm. My download of 11041 is sitting at 0% and there is
>> no Internet traffic. Okay, I will restart tomorrow and
>> see what happens.
>>
>> In the process of looking for updates, I forced a
>> reboot in the middle of some update. After reboot.
>> wuapp told me the update had been "interrupted" and did
>> I want to restart the update. I did and it did. I
>> have seen something like that bugger up w7, especially
>> with Dot Net updates. I was impressed.
>>
>> -T
>
>
> And when I went to shut down, I was told that wuapp was
> preventing my shutdown and I told it to do so anyway.
>
> Hmmm. I gave me wuapp's icon, but not its name. That
> needs improving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
> icon.
>
> Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
> a wuapp shortcut on my desktop
>
>

From the time I checked for updates, until it was downloaded and
installed was about 3 1/2 hrs

SC Tom[_3_]

March 19th 15, 02:52 PM

"philo" > wrote in message
...
> On 03/19/2015 02:29 AM, T wrote:
>> ked version.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope, I don't want that
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I am still on 9926 and wuapp.exe "check for updates" tells
>>> I am up to date. Huh.
>>>
>>> In Advanced (wuapp), I changed to "Fast" download build
>>> options, pressed "check for updates" again, and now I
>>> am downloading something large called "fbl_impressive 11041
>>> Professional"
>>>
>>> Hmmm. My download of 11041 is sitting at 0% and there is
>>> no Internet traffic. Okay, I will restart tomorrow and
>>> see what happens.
>>>
>>> In the process of looking for updates, I forced a
>>> reboot in the middle of some update. After reboot.
>>> wuapp told me the update had been "interrupted" and did
>>> I want to restart the update. I did and it did. I
>>> have seen something like that bugger up w7, especially
>>> with Dot Net updates. I was impressed.
>>>
>>> -T
>>
>>
>> And when I went to shut down, I was told that wuapp was
>> preventing my shutdown and I told it to do so anyway.
>>
>> Hmmm. I gave me wuapp's icon, but not its name. That
>> needs improving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
>> icon.
>>
>> Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
>> a wuapp shortcut on my desktop
>>
>>
>
>
>
> From the time I checked for updates, until it was downloaded and installed
> was about 3 1/2 hrs
>

I'm at 3% on the start-up installation screen. I love the "Sit back and
relax." Yeah . . . right :-(
Another favorite line is "Setting up a few more things." Kinda gives the
impression that it doesn't REALly know what it's doing ;-)
--
SC Tom

philo

March 19th 15, 03:07 PM

On 03/19/2015 09:52 AM, SC Tom wrote:
>
> mproving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
>>> icon.
>>>
>>> Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
>>> a wuapp shortcut on my desktop
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From the time I checked for updates, until it was downloaded and
>> installed was about 3 1/2 hrs
>>
>
> I'm at 3% on the start-up installation screen. I love the "Sit back and
> relax." Yeah . . . right :-(
> Another favorite line is "Setting up a few more things." Kinda gives the
> impression that it doesn't REALly know what it's doing ;-)

Yep, That bothered me too. I'd like to know what it is doing.

OTOH: At least there is now a progress report to the download status.

I've found that with all Windows updates, it's best to just set them to
go, then walk away and do not even bother to check for several hours.

Typically the thing I just let run overnight

SC Tom[_3_]

March 19th 15, 04:20 PM

"philo" > wrote in message
...
> On 03/19/2015 09:52 AM, SC Tom wrote:
>>
>> mproving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
>>>> icon.
>>>>
>>>> Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
>>>> a wuapp shortcut on my desktop
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From the time I checked for updates, until it was downloaded and
>>> installed was about 3 1/2 hrs
>>>
>>
>> I'm at 3% on the start-up installation screen. I love the "Sit back and
>> relax." Yeah . . . right :-(
>> Another favorite line is "Setting up a few more things." Kinda gives the
>> impression that it doesn't REALly know what it's doing ;-)
>
>
>
> Yep, That bothered me too. I'd like to know what it is doing.
>
>
> OTOH: At least there is now a progress report to the download status.
>
>
> I've found that with all Windows updates, it's best to just set them to
> go, then walk away and do not even bother to check for several hours.
>
> Typically the thing I just let run overnight

Mine just finished the final reboot. Everything looks the same as before,
except for the pinned programs on the taskbar that I removed last time and
today. Classic Shell still works as it did on the last build, so I'm happy
about that. I might turn it off for a while just to see what Win10 looks
like natively again. I haven't used it too much yet, but so far, same ol',
same ol' :-)
--
SC Tom

Big_Al[_4_]

March 19th 15, 04:29 PM

SC Tom wrote on 3/19/2015 12:20 PM:
>
>
> "philo" > wrote in message ...
>> On 03/19/2015 09:52 AM, SC Tom wrote:
>>>
>>> mproving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
>>>>> icon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
>>>>> a wuapp shortcut on my desktop
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From the time I checked for updates, until it was downloaded and
>>>> installed was about 3 1/2 hrs
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm at 3% on the start-up installation screen. I love the "Sit back and
>>> relax." Yeah . . . right :-(
>>> Another favorite line is "Setting up a few more things." Kinda gives the
>>> impression that it doesn't REALly know what it's doing ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> Yep, That bothered me too. I'd like to know what it is doing.
>>
>>
>> OTOH: At least there is now a progress report to the download status.
>>
>>
>> I've found that with all Windows updates, it's best to just set them to go, then walk away and do not even bother to
>> check for several hours.
>>
>> Typically the thing I just let run overnight
>
> Mine just finished the final reboot. Everything looks the same as before, except for the pinned programs on the taskbar
> that I removed last time and today. Classic Shell still works as it did on the last build, so I'm happy about that. I
> might turn it off for a while just to see what Win10 looks like natively again. I haven't used it too much yet, but so
> far, same ol', same ol' :-)
Rats, and I was so hoping for some major changes to the UI.
I guess I'll turn mine on and load it and see what it's like. It's lunch time and I can let it run for a while then.

philo

March 19th 15, 04:37 PM

On 03/19/2015 11:29 AM, Big_Al wrote:
>

>>> Typically the thing I just let run overnight
>>
>> Mine just finished the final reboot. Everything looks the same as
>> before, except for the pinned programs on the taskbar
>> that I removed last time and today. Classic Shell still works as it
>> did on the last build, so I'm happy about that. I
>> might turn it off for a while just to see what Win10 looks like
>> natively again. I haven't used it too much yet, but so
>> far, same ol', same ol' :-)
> Rats, and I was so hoping for some major changes to the UI.
> I guess I'll turn mine on and load it and see what it's like. It's
> lunch time and I can let it run for a while then.
>

I set my option back to "slow"

My feeling is that there will not be be major changes

though I've seen reports that Win10 will require Uefi

SC Tom[_3_]

March 19th 15, 05:00 PM

"philo" > wrote in message
...
> On 03/19/2015 11:29 AM, Big_Al wrote:
>>
>
>>>> Typically the thing I just let run overnight
>>>
>>> Mine just finished the final reboot. Everything looks the same as
>>> before, except for the pinned programs on the taskbar
>>> that I removed last time and today. Classic Shell still works as it
>>> did on the last build, so I'm happy about that. I
>>> might turn it off for a while just to see what Win10 looks like
>>> natively again. I haven't used it too much yet, but so
>>> far, same ol', same ol' :-)
>> Rats, and I was so hoping for some major changes to the UI.
>> I guess I'll turn mine on and load it and see what it's like. It's
>> lunch time and I can let it run for a while then.
>>
>
>
>
> I set my option back to "slow"
>
>
> My feeling is that there will not be be major changes
>
> though I've seen reports that Win10 will require Uefi

I was reading a link from another group, and the comments seem to intimate
that UEFI won't be required except on new machines. If Win10TP runs fine on
your machine now, odds are RTM will, too. Wait and see, I guess. Still too
many fuzzy guesses for me :-) If I need a new machine, so be it. Good of an
excuse as any to spend my money LOL!!
--
SC Tom

philo

March 19th 15, 05:39 PM

On 03/19/2015 12:00 PM, SC Tom wrote:

<snip>
>>
>> My feeling is that there will not be be major changes
>>
>> though I've seen reports that Win10 will require Uefi
>
> I was reading a link from another group, and the comments seem to
> intimate that UEFI won't be required except on new machines. If Win10TP
> runs fine on your machine now, odds are RTM will, too. Wait and see, I
> guess. Still too many fuzzy guesses for me :-) If I need a new machine,
> so be it. Good of an excuse as any to spend my money LOL!!

I build my own machines from other people's left-overs.

Last year, a friend of a friend was getting rid of a "quad core" machine
so I went over there to get it.

It was a single core P-4

He thought the "4" meant "quad"

Big_Al[_4_]

March 19th 15, 05:48 PM

SC Tom wrote on 3/19/2015 1:00 PM:
>
>
> "philo" > wrote in message ...
>> On 03/19/2015 11:29 AM, Big_Al wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>>> Typically the thing I just let run overnight
>>>>
>>>> Mine just finished the final reboot. Everything looks the same as
>>>> before, except for the pinned programs on the taskbar
>>>> that I removed last time and today. Classic Shell still works as it
>>>> did on the last build, so I'm happy about that. I
>>>> might turn it off for a while just to see what Win10 looks like
>>>> natively again. I haven't used it too much yet, but so
>>>> far, same ol', same ol' :-)
>>> Rats, and I was so hoping for some major changes to the UI.
>>> I guess I'll turn mine on and load it and see what it's like. It's
>>> lunch time and I can let it run for a while then.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I set my option back to "slow"
>>
>>
>> My feeling is that there will not be be major changes
>>
>> though I've seen reports that Win10 will require Uefi
>
> I was reading a link from another group, and the comments seem to intimate that UEFI won't be required except on new
> machines. If Win10TP runs fine on your machine now, odds are RTM will, too. Wait and see, I guess. Still too many fuzzy
> guesses for me :-) If I need a new machine, so be it. Good of an excuse as any to spend my money LOL!!

You need an excuse? :-)

For me if it requires new hardware, I'm running 8.1 now and quite happy with my configuration and I'll just stick with
it. I'm hoping that the free Windows10 ISO will be available some day just like the 8 iso was made available. That
way I can get it but not do the upgrade till I have killed this laptop.

SC Tom[_3_]

March 19th 15, 06:00 PM

"philo" > wrote in message
...
> On 03/19/2015 12:00 PM, SC Tom wrote:
>
> <snip>
>>>
>>> My feeling is that there will not be be major changes
>>>
>>> though I've seen reports that Win10 will require Uefi
>>
>> I was reading a link from another group, and the comments seem to
>> intimate that UEFI won't be required except on new machines. If Win10TP
>> runs fine on your machine now, odds are RTM will, too. Wait and see, I
>> guess. Still too many fuzzy guesses for me :-) If I need a new machine,
>> so be it. Good of an excuse as any to spend my money LOL!!
>
>
> I build my own machines from other people's left-overs.
>
> Last year, a friend of a friend was getting rid of a "quad core" machine
> so I went over there to get it.
>
> It was a single core P-4
>
> He thought the "4" meant "quad"
>

I could have given you a couple of MBs and AMD CPUs; I had them in the
closet for a few years until I recycled them :-) All my desktops are
upgrades, but with the price of newer machines, it's almost as cheap to go
that route than it is getting a new MB, CPU, and RAM. I have an Asus
m4n68t-m v2 MB with an AMD Phenom II x4 965BE 3.4GHz CPU as my main PC. It
has Win7 HP x86, and runs just fine for anything I need to do on it.

Win10TP is on my Acer laptop (V3-731), and has two HDD- one for Win10 x64
and the other for Win8.1Pro x64. It runs both OSs very well, and I use it
for travel, some gaming, and live streaming of sporting events when I can't
get them on TV. Works great :-) I worked IS/IT for 20 years before retiring,
and still have to try new stuff, like Win10. It's going to have to be one
helluva OS for me to dump my Win7 PC, though :-)
--
SC Tom

philo

March 19th 15, 06:09 PM

On 03/19/2015 01:00 PM, SC Tom wrote:
>
>
>>
>
> I could have given you a couple of MBs and AMD CPUs; I had them in the
> closet for a few years until I recycled them :-) All my desktops are
> upgrades, but with the price of newer machines, it's almost as cheap to
> go that route than it is getting a new MB, CPU, and RAM. I have an Asus
> m4n68t-m v2 MB with an AMD Phenom II x4 965BE 3.4GHz CPU as my main PC.
> It has Win7 HP x86, and runs just fine for anything I need to do on it.
>
> Win10TP is on my Acer laptop (V3-731), and has two HDD- one for Win10
> x64 and the other for Win8.1Pro x64. It runs both OSs very well, and I
> use it for travel, some gaming, and live streaming of sporting events
> when I can't get them on TV. Works great :-) I worked IS/IT for 20 years
> before retiring, and still have to try new stuff, like Win10. It's going
> to have to be one helluva OS for me to dump my Win7 PC, though :-)

I repair machines for a local NPO and refurbish donated computers.

At present I have plenty of fairly decent P-4's as spares.

They got Win7 licenses from Tech Soup and I now can say all XP machines
have been phased out.

I need to keep current in my knowledge though.

So far I've only seen one person who liked Win8

mayorleo

March 19th 15, 06:13 PM

My experience is similar, installing the update can best be described by one
word: Agony.

-Alamoman
Como Tejas, no hay otro

"philo" wrote in message ...

On 03/19/2015 02:29 AM, T wrote:
> ked version.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nope, I don't want that
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am still on 9926 and wuapp.exe "check for updates" tells
>> I am up to date. Huh.
>>
>> In Advanced (wuapp), I changed to "Fast" download build
>> options, pressed "check for updates" again, and now I
>> am downloading something large called "fbl_impressive 11041
>> Professional"
>>
>> Hmmm. My download of 11041 is sitting at 0% and there is
>> no Internet traffic. Okay, I will restart tomorrow and
>> see what happens.
>>
>> In the process of looking for updates, I forced a
>> reboot in the middle of some update. After reboot.
>> wuapp told me the update had been "interrupted" and did
>> I want to restart the update. I did and it did. I
>> have seen something like that bugger up w7, especially
>> with Dot Net updates. I was impressed.
>>
>> -T
>
>
> And when I went to shut down, I was told that wuapp was
> preventing my shutdown and I told it to do so anyway.
>
> Hmmm. I gave me wuapp's icon, but not its name. That
> needs improving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
> icon.
>
> Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
> a wuapp shortcut on my desktop
>
>

From the time I checked for updates, until it was downloaded and
installed was about 3 1/2 hrs

March 19th 15, 07:02 PM

On 03/19/2015 05:45 AM, philo wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 02:29 AM, T wrote:
>> ked version.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope, I don't want that
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I am still on 9926 and wuapp.exe "check for updates" tells
>>> I am up to date. Huh.
>>>
>>> In Advanced (wuapp), I changed to "Fast" download build
>>> options, pressed "check for updates" again, and now I
>>> am downloading something large called "fbl_impressive 11041
>>> Professional"
>>>
>>> Hmmm. My download of 11041 is sitting at 0% and there is
>>> no Internet traffic. Okay, I will restart tomorrow and
>>> see what happens.
>>>
>>> In the process of looking for updates, I forced a
>>> reboot in the middle of some update. After reboot.
>>> wuapp told me the update had been "interrupted" and did
>>> I want to restart the update. I did and it did. I
>>> have seen something like that bugger up w7, especially
>>> with Dot Net updates. I was impressed.
>>>
>>> -T
>>
>>
>> And when I went to shut down, I was told that wuapp was
>> preventing my shutdown and I told it to do so anyway.
>>
>> Hmmm. I gave me wuapp's icon, but not its name. That
>> needs improving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
>> icon.
>>
>> Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
>> a wuapp shortcut on my desktop
>>
>>
>
>
>
> From the time I checked for updates, until it was downloaded and
> installed was about 3 1/2 hrs
>

Hi Philo,

Great Tip. Thank you!

I have a bunch of non-computer office work today, so I will
just let ti run and run and run.

-T

March 19th 15, 07:06 PM

Bob Evans

March 19th 15, 07:08 PM

On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:18:26 -0500, philo > wrote:

>On 03/18/2015 08:15 PM, T wrote:
>> On 03/18/2015 04:59 PM, philo wrote:
>>> On 03/18/2015 06:48 PM, wrote:
>>>> philo > wrote:
>>>>> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build" option
>>>>> even if I set my choice to "fast"
>>>>
>>>> I was in receipt of build 10041 this morning through Windows Update.
>>>>
>>>> The only problem I'm experiencing so far is no Mail, Contacts or
>>>> Calendar
>>>> was installed along with it as being operational. All I get for theses
>>>> apps
>>>> when clicking on the related tile is no action and the tile has no usual
>>>> graphic and app name. From what I've seen, some of the files exist in
>>>> the
>>>> specific folders for these apps, but they refuse to function as merely
>>>> brings up a window wanting me to select the requisite program to open
>>>> but
>>>> the official app is non-existent.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yep
>>>
>>> tried later in the day and I am installing 10041 now
>>
>>
>> Any sign of an ISO?
>
>
>
>Not that I saw

'en_windows_10_pro_10041_x64_dvd.iso' was posted to my FTP site this
morning so it does exist.

March 19th 15, 07:09 PM

On 03/19/2015 05:11 AM, Darklight wrote:
> looks like win10 is a dictatorship now they just don't get it.
> there is still no choice.

I wonder if they will keep this up on the general release
of are they just trying to make sure us previewers are
all on the same preview?

Sounds like the mandatory updates will be pushed down our
throats though.

But that will put business at all the same disadvantage as
they will all crash at the same time.

There is a reason why "Patch Tuesday" is also known as
"Black Tuesday".

March 19th 15, 07:10 PM

On 03/19/2015 12:08 PM, Bob Evans wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:18:26 -0500, philo > wrote:
>
>> On 03/18/2015 08:15 PM, T wrote:
>>> On 03/18/2015 04:59 PM, philo wrote:

>>>
>>> Any sign of an ISO?
>>
>>
>>
>> Not that I saw
>
> 'en_windows_10_pro_10041_x64_dvd.iso' was posted to my FTP site this
> morning so it does exist.
>

Where did you get it from?

March 19th 15, 07:16 PM

On 03/19/2015 12:10 PM, T wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 12:08 PM, Bob Evans wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:18:26 -0500, philo > wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/18/2015 08:15 PM, T wrote:
>>>> On 03/18/2015 04:59 PM, philo wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> Any sign of an ISO?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Not that I saw
>>
>> 'en_windows_10_pro_10041_x64_dvd.iso' was posted to my FTP site this
>> morning so it does exist.
>>
>
> Where did you get it from?

http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/preview-iso

is still on 9926

Bob Evans

March 19th 15, 07:19 PM

On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:08:45 -0700, Bob Evans >
wrote:

>On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:18:26 -0500, philo > wrote:
>
>>On 03/18/2015 08:15 PM, T wrote:
>>> On 03/18/2015 04:59 PM, philo wrote:
>>>> On 03/18/2015 06:48 PM, wrote:
>>>>> philo > wrote:
>>>>>> I'm at build 9926 and decided to try build 10031
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have no such option when I go to settings....updates
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can apply Windows updates normally but there is no "new build" option
>>>>>> even if I set my choice to "fast"
>>>>>
>>>>> I was in receipt of build 10041 this morning through Windows Update.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only problem I'm experiencing so far is no Mail, Contacts or
>>>>> Calendar
>>>>> was installed along with it as being operational. All I get for theses
>>>>> apps
>>>>> when clicking on the related tile is no action and the tile has no usual
>>>>> graphic and app name. From what I've seen, some of the files exist in
>>>>> the
>>>>> specific folders for these apps, but they refuse to function as merely
>>>>> brings up a window wanting me to select the requisite program to open
>>>>> but
>>>>> the official app is non-existent.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yep
>>>>
>>>> tried later in the day and I am installing 10041 now
>>>
>>>
>>> Any sign of an ISO?
>>
>>
>>
>>Not that I saw
>
>'en_windows_10_pro_10041_x64_dvd.iso' was posted to my FTP site this
>morning so it does exist.

There are download links at the bottom of this page for the new W10
iso

http://getintopc.com/softwares/operating-systems/windows-10-pro-build-10041-free-download-iso-3264-bit/

March 19th 15, 07:22 PM

On 03/19/2015 12:19 PM, Bob Evans wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:08:45 -0700, Bob Evans >
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:18:26 -0500, philo > wrote:
Yep
>>>>>
>>>>> tried later in the day and I am installing 10041 now
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any sign of an ISO?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Not that I saw
>>
>> 'en_windows_10_pro_10041_x64_dvd.iso' was posted to my FTP site this
>> morning so it does exist.
>
> There are download links at the bottom of this page for the new W10
> iso
>
> http://getintopc.com/softwares/operating-systems/windows-10-pro-build-10041-free-download-iso-3264-bit/
>

Not to cluck like a chicken, but the links are not from M$

philo

March 19th 15, 08:23 PM

On 03/19/2015 02:06 PM, T wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> -T
>>>
>>>
>>> And when I went to shut down, I was told that wuapp was
>>> preventing my shutdown and I told it to do so anyway.
>>>
>>> Hmmm. I gave me wuapp's icon, but not its name. That
>>> needs improving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
>>> icon.
>>>
>>> Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
>>> a wuapp shortcut on my desktop
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From the time I checked for updates, until it was downloaded and
>> installed was about 3 1/2 hrs
>>
>
> Is the rumored and dreaded "Metro" back?

That's why I did the update , simply to see if that was true...
but I am happy to say it was a false report.

The new build is not much different from the old one.

Boots to the "standard" desktop. If you want the tiles though , just
left click on the (unlabeled) "start" button.

"Standard" menu, just right click on it

What I hated about Win8 (without Classic Shell) was that with one wrong
click...the tiles took over the screen and I'd have to hunt for the
desktop icon to get back. A major PITA for me and 99% of the people I
know who have Win8.

Win10 behaves considerably better

March 19th 15, 09:59 PM

On 03/19/2015 01:23 PM, philo wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 02:06 PM, T wrote:

> What I hated about Win8 (without Classic Shell) was that with one wrong
> click...the tiles took over the screen and I'd have to hunt for the
> desktop icon to get back. A major PITA for me and 99% of the people I
> know who have Win8.

Hi Philo,

I forces myself to hit the <win> key to get back to the
Desktop. But then a again, I hit the <win> key for so
many things, Metro can fly back and forth two or three
times. AAAAHHHHHH !!!!

>
> Win10 behaves considerably better

1+

I wish they'd get rid of Metro completely for
non-touch screen displays.

-T

philo

March 19th 15, 11:34 PM

On 03/19/2015 02:22 PM, T wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 12:19 PM, Bob Evans wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:08:45 -0700, Bob Evans >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:18:26 -0500, philo > wrote:
> Yep
>>>>>>
>>>>>> tried later in the day and I am installing 10041 now
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Any sign of an ISO?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not that I saw
>>>
>>> 'en_windows_10_pro_10041_x64_dvd.iso' was posted to my FTP site this
>>> morning so it does exist.
>>
>> There are download links at the bottom of this page for the new W10
>> iso
>>
>> http://getintopc.com/softwares/operating-systems/windows-10-pro-build-10041-free-download-iso-3264-bit/
>>
>>
>
> Not to cluck like a chicken, but the links are not from M$

Correct, the last time there was a new build I went to the MS site and
all they had was the original

March 20th 15, 03:30 AM

On 03/19/2015 01:23 PM, philo wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 02:06 PM, T wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -T
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And when I went to shut down, I was told that wuapp was
>>>> preventing my shutdown and I told it to do so anyway.
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm. I gave me wuapp's icon, but not its name. That
>>>> needs improving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
>>>> icon.
>>>>
>>>> Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
>>>> a wuapp shortcut on my desktop
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From the time I checked for updates, until it was downloaded and
>>> installed was about 3 1/2 hrs
>>>
>>
>> Is the rumored and dreaded "Metro" back?
>
>
>
> That's why I did the update , simply to see if that was true...
> but I am happy to say it was a false report.
>
> The new build is not much different from the old one.
>
> Boots to the "standard" desktop. If you want the tiles though , just
> left click on the (unlabeled) "start" button.
>
> "Standard" menu, just right click on it
>
>
>
> What I hated about Win8 (without Classic Shell) was that with one wrong
> click...the tiles took over the screen and I'd have to hunt for the
> desktop icon to get back. A major PITA for me and 99% of the people I
> know who have Win8.
>
>
> Win10 behaves considerably better

Hi Philo,

I am all updated now.

I am not telling any difference, except I am getting
a pop up about Windows Defender having been turned
off.

Bit Defender is still working

-T

SC Tom[_3_]

March 21st 15, 11:09 AM

"T" > wrote in message ...
> On 03/19/2015 01:23 PM, philo wrote:
>> On 03/19/2015 02:06 PM, T wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -T
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And when I went to shut down, I was told that wuapp was
>>>>> preventing my shutdown and I told it to do so anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm. I gave me wuapp's icon, but not its name. That
>>>>> needs improving, especially since the icon is a "generic"
>>>>> icon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Be fun to see how this thing recovers tomorrow. Put
>>>>> a wuapp shortcut on my desktop
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From the time I checked for updates, until it was downloaded and
>>>> installed was about 3 1/2 hrs
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is the rumored and dreaded "Metro" back?
>>
>>
>>
>> That's why I did the update , simply to see if that was true...
>> but I am happy to say it was a false report.
>>
>> The new build is not much different from the old one.
>>
>> Boots to the "standard" desktop. If you want the tiles though , just
>> left click on the (unlabeled) "start" button.
>>
>> "Standard" menu, just right click on it
>>
>>
>>
>> What I hated about Win8 (without Classic Shell) was that with one wrong
>> click...the tiles took over the screen and I'd have to hunt for the
>> desktop icon to get back. A major PITA for me and 99% of the people I
>> know who have Win8.
>>
>>
>> Win10 behaves considerably better
>
> Hi Philo,
>
> I am all updated now.
>
> I am not telling any difference, except I am getting
> a pop up about Windows Defender having been turned
> off.
>
> Bit Defender is still working
>
I got the same thing, but then, I'm running AVG. I had to reinstall it
(AVG), and then the Defender message went away and AVG took over.
--
SC Tom