PDA

View Full Version : Security patches vs Checked build ( debug ) OS's


Senthil
December 14th 03, 11:57 AM
Hello All,
I have difficulty in installing security patches. I am
running Windows XP Pro Checked OS (Gold Build 2600). I
posted a question regarding this in this news group, it
looks like the guys at MS is not interested in giving me
an answer, or perhaps they dont know! Is there any one
who could help me?

Senthil


>-----Original Message-----
>Thanks for your reply.
>I guess you didnt understand my problem. I am running
>Windows XP Pro Checked (Debug) Build. The patch from
>Windows Update /download center/kb are all meant for
>release ( free - retail )version of the Windows
>XP/2003/2000 OS's, it fails to install on a checked (
>debug ) build. My question is, is there a checked
version
>of these ( 29 + 2 ) patches available for download, if
so
>where can I find them?
>
>Senthil
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>You should download and run the following:
>>
>>Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer
>>http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/?
>url=/technet/security/tools/Tools/MBSAhome.asp
>>
>>
>>Visit this web site if you are having difficulty
>installing
>>Windows XP Security Patch 823980:
>>
>>How To Fix The Cryptographic Service Error
>>http://www.updatexp.com/cryptographic-service.html
>>
>>
>>--
>>Nicholas
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------
-
>-----------
>>
>>"Senthil" > wrote in message:
>> ...
>>
>>| Where can I find the checked versions of the security
>>| patches? The Windows update fails to install these
>>| patches Error: "No Updates Were Installed. The
>following
>>| items failed to install. To try installing them
again,
>>| click Review and install updates, and then click
>Install
>>| Now again".
>>| Installing the release version on the checked OS also
>>| fails. For example running "Windows-XP-KB823980-x86-
>>| ENU.exe" on a checked Windows XP Pro OS fails
>>| with "KB823980 Setup cannot update a checked (debug)
>>| system with a free (retail) version of KB823980, or
>vice
>>| versa".
>>|
>>| Any help?
>>| Thanks
>>| Senthil
>>.
>>
>.
>

Google