Q811493 & Win2000

[Dennis Michael Jr.]

Is this patch affecting Win2000 the same way as it is for WinXP?
Should I unistall Q811493 in my Win2000 systems? As I have on my WinXP
Systems.

Thanks,
Dennis

[Torgeir Bakken (MVP)]

"Dennis Michael Jr." wrote:

> Is this patch affecting Win2000 the same way as it is for WinXP?

Looks like it:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=06ba01c30a62%244a87ea80%24a601280a%40p hx.gbl

http://groups.google.com/groups?th=40a7818bdec4d6f3


> Should I unistall Q811493 in my Win2000 systems? As I have on my WinXP
> Systems.

I would have removed it...


--
torgeir
Microsoft MVP Scripting and WMI, Porsgrunn Norway
Administration scripting examples and an ONLINE version of the 1328 page
Scripting Guide: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scriptcenter

[Dennis Michael Jr.]

Thanks Alot!!!

Dennis


"Torgeir Bakken (MVP)" > wrote in message
...
> "Dennis Michael Jr." wrote:
>
> > Is this patch affecting Win2000 the same way as it is for WinXP?
>
> Looks like it:
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=06ba01c30a62%244a87ea80%24a601280a%40p hx.gbl
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?th=40a7818bdec4d6f3
>
>
> > Should I unistall Q811493 in my Win2000 systems? As I have on my WinXP
> > Systems.
>
> I would have removed it...
>
>
> --
> torgeir
> Microsoft MVP Scripting and WMI, Porsgrunn Norway
> Administration scripting examples and an ONLINE version of the 1328 page
> Scripting Guide: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scriptcenter
>
>

[Kevin Weilbacher]

The problem with the 811493 slow down affects only XP users with XP SP1
installed. I am running 811493 on many Win2K Pro workstations with no ill
effects.
-kw

"Torgeir Bakken (MVP)" > wrote in message
...
> "Dennis Michael Jr." wrote:
>
> > Is this patch affecting Win2000 the same way as it is for WinXP?
>
> Looks like it:
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=06ba01c30a62%244a87ea80%24a601280a%40p h
x.gbl
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?th=40a7818bdec4d6f3
>
>
> > Should I unistall Q811493 in my Win2000 systems? As I have on my WinXP
> > Systems.
>
> I would have removed it...
>
>
> --
> torgeir
> Microsoft MVP Scripting and WMI, Porsgrunn Norway
> Administration scripting examples and an ONLINE version of the 1328 page
> Scripting Guide: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scriptcenter
>
>

[Will Dormann]

"Kevin Weilbacher" > wrote in message >...
> The problem with the 811493 slow down affects only XP users with XP SP1
> installed. I am running 811493 on many Win2K Pro workstations with no ill
> effects.
> -kw


FWIW, Q811493 Prevents me from successfully resuming from STR mode on
my Win2k Pro SP3 machine. The screen is garbled and the system is
very unstable (though slightly usable to be able to do a clean reboot
most of the time)

Removing Q811493 brings back everything to normal!


-WD

[Kevin Weilbacher]

STR mode? Is that like Hibernate mode?
-kw

"Will Dormann" > wrote in message
om...
> "Kevin Weilbacher" > wrote in message
>...
> > The problem with the 811493 slow down affects only XP users with XP SP1
> > installed. I am running 811493 on many Win2K Pro workstations with no
ill
> > effects.
> > -kw
>
>
> FWIW, Q811493 Prevents me from successfully resuming from STR mode on
> my Win2k Pro SP3 machine. The screen is garbled and the system is
> very unstable (though slightly usable to be able to do a clean reboot
> most of the time)
>
> Removing Q811493 brings back everything to normal!
>
>
> -WD

[Will Dormann]

"Kevin Weilbacher" > wrote in message >...
> STR mode? Is that like Hibernate mode?


STR is Suspend To RAM (S3) power management mode.


-WD

[Kevin Weilbacher]

Oh, OK. I've never trusted those things!
-kw

"Will Dormann" > wrote in message
om...
> "Kevin Weilbacher" > wrote in message
>...
> > STR mode? Is that like Hibernate mode?
>
>
> STR is Suspend To RAM (S3) power management mode.
>
>
> -WD