More on Update 811493

[Win Day]

Here's a link to more information about update 811493, including some
straight from Microsoft:

"Thank you for the info. I'm not sure yet what is conflicting with
811493. We currently have a group of developers working on the
problem. We'll get this resolved as soon as possible. Sorry for the
inconvenience," says the note from "Lucy" at Microsoft.

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,4248,1037305,00.asp

Win
------------
Win Day, Multimedia Developer
Words Plus
http://www.wordsplus.net

[Rick \Nutcase\ Rogers]

Q811493 conflicts with certain popular AV programs. That is the reason for
the problems some, but not all, users experience.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers aka "Nutcase" MS-MVP - Win9x - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Associate Expert - WinXP - Expert Zone -
www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
Win98 Help - www.rickrogers.org

"Win Day" > wrote in message
...
> Here's a link to more information about update 811493, including some
> straight from Microsoft:
>
> "Thank you for the info. I'm not sure yet what is conflicting with
> 811493. We currently have a group of developers working on the
> problem. We'll get this resolved as soon as possible. Sorry for the
> inconvenience," says the note from "Lucy" at Microsoft.
>
> http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,4248,1037305,00.asp
>
> Win
> ------------
> Win Day, Multimedia Developer
> Words Plus
> http://www.wordsplus.net
>

[Rick \Nutcase\ Rogers]

Q811493 conflicts with certain popular AV programs. That is the reason for
the problems some, but not all, users experience.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers aka "Nutcase" MS-MVP - Win9x - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Associate Expert - WinXP - Expert Zone -
www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
Win98 Help - www.rickrogers.org

"Win Day" > wrote in message
...
> Here's a link to more information about update 811493, including some
> straight from Microsoft:
>
> "Thank you for the info. I'm not sure yet what is conflicting with
> 811493. We currently have a group of developers working on the
> problem. We'll get this resolved as soon as possible. Sorry for the
> inconvenience," says the note from "Lucy" at Microsoft.
>
> http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,4248,1037305,00.asp
>
> Win
> ------------
> Win Day, Multimedia Developer
> Words Plus
> http://www.wordsplus.net
>

[Thorsten Matzner]

"Rick \"Nutcase\" Rogers" > wrote:

>Q811493 conflicts with certain popular AV programs. That is the reason for
>the problems some, but not all, users experience.

This is not my experience. I do not use any background virus scanner
and had the same problems with that links from e-mail messages opened
very slow in the IE and the like.

--
(tm)

[Thorsten Matzner]

"Rick \"Nutcase\" Rogers" > wrote:

>Q811493 conflicts with certain popular AV programs. That is the reason for
>the problems some, but not all, users experience.

This is not my experience. I do not use any background virus scanner
and had the same problems with that links from e-mail messages opened
very slow in the IE and the like.

--
(tm)

[EGK]

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:53:34 +0200, Thorsten Matzner >
wrote:

>"Rick \"Nutcase\" Rogers" > wrote:
>
>>Q811493 conflicts with certain popular AV programs. That is the reason for
>>the problems some, but not all, users experience.
>
>This is not my experience. I do not use any background virus scanner
>and had the same problems with that links from e-mail messages opened
>very slow in the IE and the like.

Are you saying the pages opened slowly or IE itself opened slowly? Most of
the problems attributed to this update are from the program itself opening
slow. For instance you click on a link and it might take as long as 20
seconds for IE to finally decide to pop up. I was having problems like that
but page loading itself wasn't affected.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"There would be a lot more civility in this world if people
didn't take that as an invitation to walk all over you"
- (Calvin and Hobbes)

email:

[EGK]

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:53:34 +0200, Thorsten Matzner >
wrote:

>"Rick \"Nutcase\" Rogers" > wrote:
>
>>Q811493 conflicts with certain popular AV programs. That is the reason for
>>the problems some, but not all, users experience.
>
>This is not my experience. I do not use any background virus scanner
>and had the same problems with that links from e-mail messages opened
>very slow in the IE and the like.

Are you saying the pages opened slowly or IE itself opened slowly? Most of
the problems attributed to this update are from the program itself opening
slow. For instance you click on a link and it might take as long as 20
seconds for IE to finally decide to pop up. I was having problems like that
but page loading itself wasn't affected.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"There would be a lot more civility in this world if people
didn't take that as an invitation to walk all over you"
- (Calvin and Hobbes)

email:

[Thorsten Matzner]

EGK > wrote:

>Are you saying the pages opened slowly or IE itself opened slowly?

The IE opened slowly. It took about ten seconds until the IE window
appeared. In the meantime Windows was blocked so one couldn't even
change to other tasks to continue working here.

--
(tm)

[Thorsten Matzner]

EGK > wrote:

>Are you saying the pages opened slowly or IE itself opened slowly?

The IE opened slowly. It took about ten seconds until the IE window
appeared. In the meantime Windows was blocked so one couldn't even
change to other tasks to continue working here.

--
(tm)

[EGK]

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:07:56 +0200, Thorsten Matzner >
wrote:

>EGK > wrote:
>
>>Are you saying the pages opened slowly or IE itself opened slowly?
>
>The IE opened slowly. It took about ten seconds until the IE window
>appeared. In the meantime Windows was blocked so one couldn't even
>change to other tasks to continue working here.

ahh, ok. that's it then. The way you wrote it the first time I thought you
meant the internet traffic itself was slow.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"There would be a lot more civility in this world if people
didn't take that as an invitation to walk all over you"
- (Calvin and Hobbes)

email:

[EGK]

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:07:56 +0200, Thorsten Matzner >
wrote:

>EGK > wrote:
>
>>Are you saying the pages opened slowly or IE itself opened slowly?
>
>The IE opened slowly. It took about ten seconds until the IE window
>appeared. In the meantime Windows was blocked so one couldn't even
>change to other tasks to continue working here.

ahh, ok. that's it then. The way you wrote it the first time I thought you
meant the internet traffic itself was slow.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"There would be a lot more civility in this world if people
didn't take that as an invitation to walk all over you"
- (Calvin and Hobbes)

email:

[Thorsten Matzner]

EGK > wrote:

>ahh, ok. that's it then. The way you wrote it the first time I thought you
>meant the internet traffic itself was slow.

Sorry for the confusion.

--
(tm)

[Thorsten Matzner]

EGK > wrote:

>ahh, ok. that's it then. The way you wrote it the first time I thought you
>meant the internet traffic itself was slow.

Sorry for the confusion.

--
(tm)