Word file

[RB Tiwari]

There is problem in opening the word document file and
computer is getting hanged. How to solve this problem

[Gordon Burgess-Parker]

Rename (or delete if you have no custom templates set up) the file called
Normal.dot

"RB Tiwari" > wrote in message
...
> There is problem in opening the word document file and
> computer is getting hanged. How to solve this problem

[Perdita X. Dream]

RB Tiwari wrote:
> There is problem in opening the word document file and
> computer is getting hanged. How to solve this problem

Please see link three in my signature to learn how to post to newsgroups
properly and effectively.

--
Perdita X. Dream

Please help us to help you
http://groups.google.com
http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Please note that the reply address is fake.
Keep all posts to the groups as private requests for assistance
(i.e. email/IM) cannot be acknowledged. Thank you.

[Mike Hall]

It would be nice to think that we could forgive cultural differences and
accept that we all have differing levels of ability re. use of english and
associated grammar.. surely we are here to help people with computer
problems, and not to judge their ability to be 100% coherent in their use of
the english language..

"Perdita X. Dream" > wrote in message
...
> RB Tiwari wrote:
> > There is problem in opening the word document file and
> > computer is getting hanged. How to solve this problem
>
> Please see link three in my signature to learn how to post to newsgroups
> properly and effectively.
>
> --
> Perdita X. Dream
>
> Please help us to help you
> http://groups.google.com
> http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
> Please note that the reply address is fake.
> Keep all posts to the groups as private requests for assistance
> (i.e. email/IM) cannot be acknowledged. Thank you.
>
>
>
>

[Patrick]

Perdita X. Dream wrote:
> RB Tiwari wrote:
>> There is problem in opening the word document file and
>> computer is getting hanged. How to solve this problem
>
> Please see link three in my signature to learn how to post to
> newsgroups properly and effectively.

Hello Perdita,
Haveing seen some few of your replies to OP's, I note that they are
*brusk*.
Yet this OP writes his problem *concisely* (well, suffice to understand
anyway) and without multiplication of words, but you find you find fault
with this.

The OP appears to have been quite well understood by another person who
replied to him, so why not you ?

[Gordon Burgess-Parker]

"Patrick" > wrote in message
...
..
>
> Hello Perdita,
> Haveing seen some few of your replies to OP's, I note that they are
> *brusk*.

Aha. Should be "brusque"!

> Yet this OP writes his problem *concisely* (well, suffice to understand
> anyway) and without multiplication of words, but you find you find fault
> with this.
>
> The OP appears to have been quite well understood by another person who
> replied to him, so why not you ?
>
>

[Patrick]

Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> "Patrick" > wrote in message
> ...
> .
>>
>> Hello Perdita,
>> Haveing seen some few of your replies to OP's, I note that they
>> are *brusk*.
>
> Aha. Should be "brusque"!

Thank you my good-man, It hadn't occured to me that it was wrong.
I'm sure that I agree with your correction, thanks again.
PS I don't suppose that Americans spell it like I did (could blame it on
them perhaps ! ). :)

>
>> Yet this OP writes his problem *concisely* (well, suffice to
>> understand anyway) and without multiplication of words, but you find
>> you find fault with this.
>>
>> The OP appears to have been quite well understood by another person
>> who replied to him, so why not you ?

[Mike Bynum]

"Patrick" > wrote in message
...
> Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> > "Patrick" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > .
> >>
> >> Hello Perdita,
> >> Haveing seen some few of your replies to OP's, I note that they
> >> are *brusk*.
> >
> > Aha. Should be "brusque"!
>
> Thank you my good-man, It hadn't occured to me that it was wrong.
> I'm sure that I agree with your correction, thanks again.
> PS I don't suppose that Americans spell it like I did (could blame it on
> them perhaps ! ). :)
>
> >
> >> Yet this OP writes his problem *concisely* (well, suffice to
> >> understand anyway) and without multiplication of words, but you find
> >> you find fault with this.
> >>
> >> The OP appears to have been quite well understood by another person
> >> who replied to him, so why not you ?
>
>


No such luck Patrick. This is one of those words we spell the same way you
do. Nice try anyway!

Mike

[Patrick]

Mike Bynum wrote:
> "Patrick" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
>>> "Patrick" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> .
>>>>
>>>> Hello Perdita,
>>>> Haveing seen some few of your replies to OP's, I note that they
>>>> are *brusk*.
>>>
>>> Aha. Should be "brusque"!
>>
>> Thank you my good-man, It hadn't occured to me that it was wrong.
>> I'm sure that I agree with your correction, thanks again.
>> PS I don't suppose that Americans spell it like I did (could blame
>> it on them perhaps ! ). :)
>>
>>>
>>>> Yet this OP writes his problem *concisely* (well, suffice to
>>>> understand anyway) and without multiplication of words, but you
>>>> find you find fault with this.
>>>>
>>>> The OP appears to have been quite well understood by another person
>>>> who replied to him, so why not you ?
>>
>>
>
>
> No such luck Patrick. This is one of those words we spell the same
> way you do. Nice try anyway!
>
> Mike

Okey-dokey, yankee-doodle ! :)