PDA

View Full Version : RAW vs EMF format for high-res digital images


Douglas Laudenschlager
September 1st 03, 08:03 PM
MY QUESTION
If I change RAW to EMF format to spool high resolution digital images from
PhotoShop to a photo printer, in order to take advantage of the print server
and free up my desktop computer, will the output quality of the images
suffer?

BACKGROUND
I understand that Windows basically uses 1 of 2 formats to spool images to a
printer: EMF (the more efficient) or RAW. I see that both the printers we
have installed on various Windows XP Pro computers here are set to RAW by
default. I also understand that EMF gets spooled to a print server for
processing (if there is a print server), while RAW is processed on the
client machine.

SCENARIO
I am setting up a print server for a photographer who prints high-resolution
images to his Epson 2200 that may lock up the client machine for as long as
a half-hour per image. However the print server won't help if RAW images are
still processed entirely on the client. I'm trying to understand what my
options are here!

Thank you!

Thomas Ferguson
September 1st 03, 08:23 PM
This article might be of use. It speaks of Windows 9x systems but the basic
information has wider application.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/w98ddk/hh/w98ddk/printer_0r5j.asp

This article is probably more useful since it pertains to NT systems.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/ntwrkstn/reskit/wrkprint.asp

And these pertain directly to XP.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/proddocs/sag_printconcepts_cpu_datatypes.asp

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/w98ddk/hh/w98ddk/printer_0qyd.asp

And possibly useful-
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwinpro02/html/w9p0102.asp

Hope these set you off in the right direction.

--

Tom
MSMVP PS-D





"Douglas Laudenschlager" > wrote
in message ...
> MY QUESTION
> If I change RAW to EMF format to spool high resolution digital images from
> PhotoShop to a photo printer, in order to take advantage of the print
server
> and free up my desktop computer, will the output quality of the images
> suffer?
>
> BACKGROUND
> I understand that Windows basically uses 1 of 2 formats to spool images to
a
> printer: EMF (the more efficient) or RAW. I see that both the printers we
> have installed on various Windows XP Pro computers here are set to RAW by
> default. I also understand that EMF gets spooled to a print server for
> processing (if there is a print server), while RAW is processed on the
> client machine.
>
> SCENARIO
> I am setting up a print server for a photographer who prints
high-resolution
> images to his Epson 2200 that may lock up the client machine for as long
as
> a half-hour per image. However the print server won't help if RAW images
are
> still processed entirely on the client. I'm trying to understand what my
> options are here!
>
> Thank you!
>
>

Google