XP Home speed experience

[David Silverman]

It seems to me that XP is inherently sluggish--what has been
experience of others?

[Suz McClure]

Lack of physical RAM affects XP performance.. how much do you have
installed?

"David Silverman" > wrote in message
...
> It seems to me that XP is inherently sluggish--what has been
> experience of others?
>

[Amethyst]

David Silverman wrote:
> It seems to me that XP is inherently sluggish--what has been
> experience of others?

Nope it's your system that's inherently sluggish - speed is at least 50%
faster than 9x.

--
Cassandra
Card carrying member of the Fresh Start Club 'The Undead Are People Too!'

Reply address is fake. Please send all praise, abuse, insults, bequests
of £1million to cassandra (at) craigy34 (dot) freeserve (dot) co (dot)
uk. Change the obvious to the obvious.
Private requests for assistance will not be acknowledged. Please post all
correspondence to the group so that all may benefit. Thank you.

[gulyás]

First thing I noticed when I installed XP RC2 over Win98, is how much faster
the computer ran.
Now I'm running XP Home on 2 computers and to me, it seems like they run
even faster after use.

"David Silverman" > wrote in message
...
> It seems to me that XP is inherently sluggish--what has been
> experience of others?
>

[Van]

add ram ...... I upped mine to 512 and the difference was
amazing.


>-----Original Message-----
>Lack of physical RAM affects XP performance.. how much do
you have
>installed?
>
>"David Silverman" > wrote in message
...
>> It seems to me that XP is inherently sluggish--what has been
>> experience of others?
>>
>
>
>.
>

[David Silverman]

256 MB
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:40:21 -0500, "Suz McClure"
> wrote:

>Lack of physical RAM affects XP performance.. how much do you have
>installed?
>
>"David Silverman" > wrote in message
...
>> It seems to me that XP is inherently sluggish--what has been
>> experience of others?
>>
>

[Scott TNT Piehler]

It's ok if you leave it alone and don't do something stupid like
installing SP1 and doing upgrades and that kind of ****. Seems to run
fast using hyperthreading and a dual cpu.

David Silverman wrote:

> It seems to me that XP is inherently sluggish--what has been
> experience of others?