Re: Windows Welcome Screen

[Doug Knox MS-MVP]

Start, Run and enter CONTROL USERPASSWORDS2 Uncheck Users must enter a
username......... Click Apply and provide the requested information.

--
Doug Knox, MS-MVP Windows XP/ Windows Smart Display
Win 95/98/Me/XP Tweaks and Fixes
http://www.dougknox.com
--------------------------------
Associate Expert
ExpertZone - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
--------------------------------
Please reply only to the newsgroup so all may benefit.
Unsolicited e-mail is not answered.

"Warren Strickland" > wrote in message
...
> After downloading Microsoft .NET Framework version 1.1 from the Windows
> Update site, the computer now goes to a Welcome screen where I have to
click
> on my username in order to reach the desktop. Prior to the update, this
did
> not occur. Although it is not a problem, I would like to be able to skip
> this step. Is there a way to go directly to the desktop bypassing the
user
> ID?
>
>

[Doug Knox MS-MVP]

Start, Run and enter CONTROL USERPASSWORDS2 Uncheck Users must enter a
username......... Click Apply and provide the requested information.

--
Doug Knox, MS-MVP Windows XP/ Windows Smart Display
Win 95/98/Me/XP Tweaks and Fixes
http://www.dougknox.com
--------------------------------
Associate Expert
ExpertZone - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
--------------------------------
Please reply only to the newsgroup so all may benefit.
Unsolicited e-mail is not answered.

"Warren Strickland" > wrote in message
...
> After downloading Microsoft .NET Framework version 1.1 from the Windows
> Update site, the computer now goes to a Welcome screen where I have to
click
> on my username in order to reach the desktop. Prior to the update, this
did
> not occur. Although it is not a problem, I would like to be able to skip
> this step. Is there a way to go directly to the desktop bypassing the
user
> ID?
>
>

[Sharon F]

Gunner, it looks like you should leave 1.0 in place - especially if you
are running applications that depend on that version of .NET Framework.
Here's a link to an article that I found that explains it rather neatly:
http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Code/2003/April/SideBySide1.1.asp

Sharon F
MS MVP [Shell/User]

On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 08:20:31 -0400, "Gunner" >
wrote:

>Thanks again Sharon... have a good one... Gunner
>__________________________________________________ __
>
>"Sharon F" > wrote in message
...
>> You're welcome, Gunner.
>>
>> For the .NET framework: There's no mention in the download's blurb at
>> Windows Update about having to uninstall the old download. Since the
>> .NET framework is considered a part of the operating system, my gut
>> feeling is that - no - you don't have to uninstall the old one. It was
>> probably "absorbed" by 1.1 and that Add/Remove list item will get
>> cleaned up when SP2 is released. I'll ask around and try to find out for
>> sure though. Will post back with if I hear anything back.
>>
>> Sharon F
>> MS MVP [Shell/User]

[Sharon F]

Gunner, it looks like you should leave 1.0 in place - especially if you
are running applications that depend on that version of .NET Framework.
Here's a link to an article that I found that explains it rather neatly:
http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Code/2003/April/SideBySide1.1.asp

Sharon F
MS MVP [Shell/User]

On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 08:20:31 -0400, "Gunner" >
wrote:

>Thanks again Sharon... have a good one... Gunner
>__________________________________________________ __
>
>"Sharon F" > wrote in message
...
>> You're welcome, Gunner.
>>
>> For the .NET framework: There's no mention in the download's blurb at
>> Windows Update about having to uninstall the old download. Since the
>> .NET framework is considered a part of the operating system, my gut
>> feeling is that - no - you don't have to uninstall the old one. It was
>> probably "absorbed" by 1.1 and that Add/Remove list item will get
>> cleaned up when SP2 is released. I'll ask around and try to find out for
>> sure though. Will post back with if I hear anything back.
>>
>> Sharon F
>> MS MVP [Shell/User]

[Brian Desmond/469090]

Correct. The framework versions are designed to and should run side-by-side.
..Net applications will target the proper framework version when they run.

--
--Brian Desmond
WPCP Tech

Http://www.wpcp.org

Beta #469090


"Sharon F" > wrote in message
...
> Gunner, it looks like you should leave 1.0 in place - especially if you
> are running applications that depend on that version of .NET Framework.
> Here's a link to an article that I found that explains it rather neatly:
> http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Code/2003/April/SideBySide1.1.asp
>
> Sharon F
> MS MVP [Shell/User]
>
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 08:20:31 -0400, "Gunner" >
> wrote:
>
> >Thanks again Sharon... have a good one... Gunner
> >__________________________________________________ __
> >
> >"Sharon F" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> You're welcome, Gunner.
> >>
> >> For the .NET framework: There's no mention in the download's blurb at
> >> Windows Update about having to uninstall the old download. Since the
> >> .NET framework is considered a part of the operating system, my gut
> >> feeling is that - no - you don't have to uninstall the old one. It was
> >> probably "absorbed" by 1.1 and that Add/Remove list item will get
> >> cleaned up when SP2 is released. I'll ask around and try to find out
for
> >> sure though. Will post back with if I hear anything back.
> >>
> >> Sharon F
> >> MS MVP [Shell/User]
>

[Brian Desmond/469090]

Correct. The framework versions are designed to and should run side-by-side.
..Net applications will target the proper framework version when they run.

--
--Brian Desmond
WPCP Tech

Http://www.wpcp.org

Beta #469090


"Sharon F" > wrote in message
...
> Gunner, it looks like you should leave 1.0 in place - especially if you
> are running applications that depend on that version of .NET Framework.
> Here's a link to an article that I found that explains it rather neatly:
> http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Code/2003/April/SideBySide1.1.asp
>
> Sharon F
> MS MVP [Shell/User]
>
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 08:20:31 -0400, "Gunner" >
> wrote:
>
> >Thanks again Sharon... have a good one... Gunner
> >__________________________________________________ __
> >
> >"Sharon F" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> You're welcome, Gunner.
> >>
> >> For the .NET framework: There's no mention in the download's blurb at
> >> Windows Update about having to uninstall the old download. Since the
> >> .NET framework is considered a part of the operating system, my gut
> >> feeling is that - no - you don't have to uninstall the old one. It was
> >> probably "absorbed" by 1.1 and that Add/Remove list item will get
> >> cleaned up when SP2 is released. I'll ask around and try to find out
for
> >> sure though. Will post back with if I hear anything back.
> >>
> >> Sharon F
> >> MS MVP [Shell/User]
>

[Gunner]

Thanks Sharon... I will leave it (1.0) there. Have a good one... Gunner
__________________________________________________ _______________

"Sharon F" > wrote in message
...
> Gunner, it looks like you should leave 1.0 in place - especially if you
> are running applications that depend on that version of .NET Framework.
> Here's a link to an article that I found that explains it rather neatly:
> http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Code/2003/April/SideBySide1.1.asp
>
> Sharon F
> MS MVP [Shell/User]

[Gunner]

Thanks Sharon... I will leave it (1.0) there. Have a good one... Gunner
__________________________________________________ _______________

"Sharon F" > wrote in message
...
> Gunner, it looks like you should leave 1.0 in place - especially if you
> are running applications that depend on that version of .NET Framework.
> Here's a link to an article that I found that explains it rather neatly:
> http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Code/2003/April/SideBySide1.1.asp
>
> Sharon F
> MS MVP [Shell/User]

[Sharon F]

You're very welcome, Gunner.
Take care,
Sharon F
MS MVP [Shell/User]



On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:51:41 -0400, "Gunner" >
wrote:

>Thanks Sharon... I will leave it (1.0) there. Have a good one... Gunner
>__________________________________________________ _______________
>
>"Sharon F" > wrote in message
...
>> Gunner, it looks like you should leave 1.0 in place - especially if you
>> are running applications that depend on that version of .NET Framework.
>> Here's a link to an article that I found that explains it rather neatly:
>> http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Code/2003/April/SideBySide1.1.asp
>>
>> Sharon F
>> MS MVP [Shell/User]

[Sharon F]

You're very welcome, Gunner.
Take care,
Sharon F
MS MVP [Shell/User]



On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:51:41 -0400, "Gunner" >
wrote:

>Thanks Sharon... I will leave it (1.0) there. Have a good one... Gunner
>__________________________________________________ _______________
>
>"Sharon F" > wrote in message
...
>> Gunner, it looks like you should leave 1.0 in place - especially if you
>> are running applications that depend on that version of .NET Framework.
>> Here's a link to an article that I found that explains it rather neatly:
>> http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Code/2003/April/SideBySide1.1.asp
>>
>> Sharon F
>> MS MVP [Shell/User]

[C&J]

In your instructions for disabling the notification for unread mail for all
users, you point to a subkey entitled "UnreadMail". However, it doesn't
exist on my system so am I simply creating this key?

[Amethyst]

C&J wrote:
> In your instructions for disabling the notification for unread mail for
all
> users, you point to a subkey entitled "UnreadMail". However, it doesn't
> exist on my system so am I simply creating this key?

In whose instructions? Please keep all replies with the original thread as
this makes no sense on its own.

Thank you


--�
Cassandra
Card carrying member of the Fresh Start Club 'The Undead Are People Too!'

Reply address is fake. Please send all praise, abuse, insults, bequests
of £1million to cassandra (at) craigy34 (dot) freeserve (dot) co (dot)
uk. Change the obvious to the obvious.
Private requests for assistance will not be acknowledged. Please post all
correspondence to the group so that all may benefit. Thank you.