PDA

View Full Version : WinXP Pro and Dual HT-enabled Processors


Matt...
December 6th 03, 08:58 PM
I have been looking around to see if WinXP Pro fully
supports a dual processor (Xeon) environment with
hyperthreading technology incorperated.

I know I need XP Pro for dual processor environments (the
Home version doesn't support that). But does XP Pro count
virtual processors or physical processors? I know XP Pro
supports hyperthreading technology and only accepts dual-
processor environments but does the second virtual
processor count in each physical property as an actual
processor according to EULA? The EULA, as far as I have
seen, does not make a distinction between a virtual
processor or a physical one. So I am wondering if I have
a dual HT-enabled processor environment is all of the
processing power going to be utilized or just two of the
four "virtualized" processors going to be use?

Thanks,

Matt

Jason Tsang
December 6th 03, 08:58 PM
It counts physical processors.

If you have two HT enabled processors, Windows XP Pro will work with four
logical processors.

--
Jason Tsang - Microsoft MVP

Find out about the MS MVP Program -
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx

"Matt..." > wrote in message
...
> I have been looking around to see if WinXP Pro fully
> supports a dual processor (Xeon) environment with
> hyperthreading technology incorperated.
>
> I know I need XP Pro for dual processor environments (the
> Home version doesn't support that). But does XP Pro count
> virtual processors or physical processors? I know XP Pro
> supports hyperthreading technology and only accepts dual-
> processor environments but does the second virtual
> processor count in each physical property as an actual
> processor according to EULA? The EULA, as far as I have
> seen, does not make a distinction between a virtual
> processor or a physical one. So I am wondering if I have
> a dual HT-enabled processor environment is all of the
> processing power going to be utilized or just two of the
> four "virtualized" processors going to be use?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt

Google