boom
May 19th 04, 09:18 PM
Try deleting everything on yout computer without backing=20
it up then sell your computer and go buy a new one for=20
$28,100 on Alienware.com that should help
>-----Original Message-----
>MSN Messenger seems to have a very irregular behaviour=20
>under restrictive firewalls or error-prone=20
>networks/environments, whereas other instant messaging=20
>protocols seem to be more stable on the same conditions.=20
>For example, in such circunstances it is usual for MSN=20
>Messenger to not only lose messages (ie, messages don't=20
>get to the destination) but also not to warn the user=20
>about this as it usually does!
>
>But ICQ, for example, seems to have some kind of=20
>acknowledgement system that doesn't even allow the user=20
to=20
>send a new message until the previous one is received by=20
>the other party. This can be annoying but a simpler=20
method=20
>could be implemented where the same kind of=20
>acknowledgement system is used but the user can continue=20
>to message while Messenger attempts to send the previous=20
>messages.
>
>I'm aware of the fact that MSN Messenger does implement=20
>some kind of acknowledgement system, but somehow it=20
seems=20
>very irregular and unsufficient. MSN Messenger should=20
>require acknowledgement for *every* single message and=20
if=20
>it's not received after a certain time it should try to=20
>send it again. After some attempts, if the=20
acknowledgement=20
>is not retrieved, the user should then be informed that=20
>the message may have not reached its destination.=20
Ideally=20
>Messenger should also provide some kind of visual aid to=20
>let the user know which messages are granted to have=20
>already been received or not (like a different icon in=20
the=20
>beginning of the "<display name> says:" line for the=20
>messages that have been received on the other end and=20
>those for which the Messenger hasn't still got the=20
>acknowledgement).
>
>Any help or feedback on this matter would be widely=20
>appreciated!
>
>Best Regards,
>Jo=E3o Campos
>.
>
it up then sell your computer and go buy a new one for=20
$28,100 on Alienware.com that should help
>-----Original Message-----
>MSN Messenger seems to have a very irregular behaviour=20
>under restrictive firewalls or error-prone=20
>networks/environments, whereas other instant messaging=20
>protocols seem to be more stable on the same conditions.=20
>For example, in such circunstances it is usual for MSN=20
>Messenger to not only lose messages (ie, messages don't=20
>get to the destination) but also not to warn the user=20
>about this as it usually does!
>
>But ICQ, for example, seems to have some kind of=20
>acknowledgement system that doesn't even allow the user=20
to=20
>send a new message until the previous one is received by=20
>the other party. This can be annoying but a simpler=20
method=20
>could be implemented where the same kind of=20
>acknowledgement system is used but the user can continue=20
>to message while Messenger attempts to send the previous=20
>messages.
>
>I'm aware of the fact that MSN Messenger does implement=20
>some kind of acknowledgement system, but somehow it=20
seems=20
>very irregular and unsufficient. MSN Messenger should=20
>require acknowledgement for *every* single message and=20
if=20
>it's not received after a certain time it should try to=20
>send it again. After some attempts, if the=20
acknowledgement=20
>is not retrieved, the user should then be informed that=20
>the message may have not reached its destination.=20
Ideally=20
>Messenger should also provide some kind of visual aid to=20
>let the user know which messages are granted to have=20
>already been received or not (like a different icon in=20
the=20
>beginning of the "<display name> says:" line for the=20
>messages that have been received on the other end and=20
>those for which the Messenger hasn't still got the=20
>acknowledgement).
>
>Any help or feedback on this matter would be widely=20
>appreciated!
>
>Best Regards,
>Jo=E3o Campos
>.
>