December 9th 03, 10:45 AM
>-----Original Message-----
>Here's a question:
>
>I'm running Windows XP home. My master HD is NTFS while
my
>slave is FAT32. The system runs fine as is - no dropped
>frames - no crashes - nothing to complain about.
>
>Is this a stable configuration, or should I reformat my
>slave from FAT32 to NTFS???
>
>Anyone have experience in this area???
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>David jensen
>.
>
Sounds good to me; you can store all your private stuff
in ntfs and share your fat on a virtual network. Some
networks do the same for security reasons. I guess in
some ways the f.a.t slave is like another pc on a network
except just housed in one box. Not much experience, but
logically seems okay... would worry a bit if we were
talking single drive partitions, but that may be okay
too... It's possible to have 2 completely different
operating systems on one partitioned drive (as is fat &
ntfs) even as diverse as windows and linux.
Shame windows and mac aren't so compatible... still i can
dream can't i?!
>Here's a question:
>
>I'm running Windows XP home. My master HD is NTFS while
my
>slave is FAT32. The system runs fine as is - no dropped
>frames - no crashes - nothing to complain about.
>
>Is this a stable configuration, or should I reformat my
>slave from FAT32 to NTFS???
>
>Anyone have experience in this area???
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>David jensen
>.
>
Sounds good to me; you can store all your private stuff
in ntfs and share your fat on a virtual network. Some
networks do the same for security reasons. I guess in
some ways the f.a.t slave is like another pc on a network
except just housed in one box. Not much experience, but
logically seems okay... would worry a bit if we were
talking single drive partitions, but that may be okay
too... It's possible to have 2 completely different
operating systems on one partitioned drive (as is fat &
ntfs) even as diverse as windows and linux.
Shame windows and mac aren't so compatible... still i can
dream can't i?!