Re: Prove this critical patch from MS

[Miss Perspicacia Tick]

I don't think I need to insult anybody's intelligence by warning that the
attached is a virus, now do I...?

[eschatonik]

Miss Perspicacia Tick wrote:

> I don't think I need to insult anybody's intelligence by warning that the
> attached is a virus, now do I...?
>
>
>

<SARCASM>
I think you are insulting the integrity of USENET! There could *never*
be an infected file in a hermetically pristine environment such as THIS!
</SARCASM>

--

Chris Gsell
www.eschatonik.com

[David Candy]

But I feel insulted at the implication I wouldn't recognise sarcasm.

--=20
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.counterpunch.org/bageant06132004.html
"eschatonik" <""usenet\"@eschatonik removethis .com"> wrote in message =
news:0yQCc.9415$E84.5590@edtnps89...
> Miss Perspicacia Tick wrote:
>=20
> > I don't think I need to insult anybody's intelligence by warning =
that the
> > attached is a virus, now do I...?
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
>=20
> <SARCASM>
> I think you are insulting the integrity of USENET! There could *never* =

> be an infected file in a hermetically pristine environment such as =
THIS!
> </SARCASM>
>=20
> --=20
>=20
> Chris Gsell
> www.eschatonik.com