Chad C. Mulligan
December 5th 03, 12:38 AM
This is a test reply to Kadaitcha Man's terribly vulgar topic to see how easy it
is to stay in the thread and change the vulgar subject line. Sorry about any
waste of bandwidth (unless it suceeds . . . then maybe we can all learn
something from this about not propagating his BS).
-- Chad
miner wrote:
> Look you guys; look at yourself. No reason for profanity!
>
> He is providing help to people who appreciate and need it and something that
> I need. Perhaps he does not follow all the MS propaganda, good thing, but
> many links are to MS.
>
> At least somebody is doing something constructive. What has profanity
> accomplished?
>
> Except degrade oneself.
> Max
>
> "Keyser Soze" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Mister Charlie wrote:
> > : "Keyser Soze" > wrote in message
> > : ...
> > :: JCH wrote:
> > ::: A**Hole
> > ::
> > :: Let's just think for a moment about your morality here.
> > ::
> > :: It's not ok in your opinion to utilise the full expletive when
> > : expressing oneself emphatically.
> > ::
> > :: But it is ok to substitute the entire thrust of expression with
> > : asterisks, even though that in itself does
> > :: not detract from the obviousness of what it is you mean to express,
> > : which incidentally loses no meaning
> > :: whatsoever.
> > ::
> > :: Guess it just makes you feel better that you haven't been less than
> > : saintly huh? The next thing will be
> > :: you, denying that you said anything of the sort.
> > ::
> > : I don't think using or blanking out that word has any relevance to the
> > : issue whatsoever.
> > :
> > : But by self-censoring, the posters are STILL leaving the worse words
> > : in the troll's subject header.
> > :
> > : For the record, this guy is, as was already stated, a classic example
> > : of a troll. AND an asshole.
> >
> > Who said anything about it being an issue?
> > I wouldn't go as far to say JCH is that bad as a troll and arsehole :^)
> > This NG is no different to any TV channel; people have a choice about the
> exposure they give themselves.
> > Once they have tasted it, only then to find it unpalatable, they either
> stay or leave.
> > --
> > ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> > One can always be kind to people
> > about whom one cares nothing. OW
> >
> > ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> >
> >
is to stay in the thread and change the vulgar subject line. Sorry about any
waste of bandwidth (unless it suceeds . . . then maybe we can all learn
something from this about not propagating his BS).
-- Chad
miner wrote:
> Look you guys; look at yourself. No reason for profanity!
>
> He is providing help to people who appreciate and need it and something that
> I need. Perhaps he does not follow all the MS propaganda, good thing, but
> many links are to MS.
>
> At least somebody is doing something constructive. What has profanity
> accomplished?
>
> Except degrade oneself.
> Max
>
> "Keyser Soze" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Mister Charlie wrote:
> > : "Keyser Soze" > wrote in message
> > : ...
> > :: JCH wrote:
> > ::: A**Hole
> > ::
> > :: Let's just think for a moment about your morality here.
> > ::
> > :: It's not ok in your opinion to utilise the full expletive when
> > : expressing oneself emphatically.
> > ::
> > :: But it is ok to substitute the entire thrust of expression with
> > : asterisks, even though that in itself does
> > :: not detract from the obviousness of what it is you mean to express,
> > : which incidentally loses no meaning
> > :: whatsoever.
> > ::
> > :: Guess it just makes you feel better that you haven't been less than
> > : saintly huh? The next thing will be
> > :: you, denying that you said anything of the sort.
> > ::
> > : I don't think using or blanking out that word has any relevance to the
> > : issue whatsoever.
> > :
> > : But by self-censoring, the posters are STILL leaving the worse words
> > : in the troll's subject header.
> > :
> > : For the record, this guy is, as was already stated, a classic example
> > : of a troll. AND an asshole.
> >
> > Who said anything about it being an issue?
> > I wouldn't go as far to say JCH is that bad as a troll and arsehole :^)
> > This NG is no different to any TV channel; people have a choice about the
> exposure they give themselves.
> > Once they have tasted it, only then to find it unpalatable, they either
> stay or leave.
> > --
> > ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> > One can always be kind to people
> > about whom one cares nothing. OW
> >
> > ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> >
> >