xp - ICS - bluetooth PAN - cant download large files

[Kemal Oral CANSIZLAR]

Hi,

I have a very weird problem.

I have 3 XP Pro SP2 PCs, one acts as the gateway sharing Internet connection
from cable modem (Comcast), the other two clients directly connect to
gateway via bluetooth resulting in a 3-computer Bluetooth PAN. One client
works just fine, can see other PCs on network, download upload any size of
data on Internet. However the other client acts really bizarre; the private
LAN operations are allright, however, in the case of accessing the public
Internet, it is able to download small-sized web pages, but cannot download
larger web pages - same goeas true for FTP and even telnet sessions.
However, if directly connected to the Internet standalone (it is originally
configured for Yahoo! DSL), the machine is operating fine in all mentioned
cases.

Does anyone have any pointers, I am currently stuck?

Thank you,

-Kemal.

[Kemal Oral CANSIZLAR]

Hi,

After I installed "deterministic network enhancer" that comes with cisco vpn
client on the ill behaving client machine, everything began working fine.
The gateway was also using DNE, maybe that was the reason, but I didnot
quite understand the reasoning behind it, what is the influence of DNE here?
Filtering?

Thanks,

-Kemal.

"Kemal Oral CANSIZLAR" > wrote in message
...
> Hi,
>
> I have a very weird problem.
>
> I have 3 XP Pro SP2 PCs, one acts as the gateway sharing Internet
> connection from cable modem (Comcast), the other two clients directly
> connect to gateway via bluetooth resulting in a 3-computer Bluetooth PAN.
> One client works just fine, can see other PCs on network, download upload
> any size of data on Internet. However the other client acts really
> bizarre; the private LAN operations are allright, however, in the case of
> accessing the public Internet, it is able to download small-sized web
> pages, but cannot download larger web pages - same goeas true for FTP and
> even telnet sessions. However, if directly connected to the Internet
> standalone (it is originally configured for Yahoo! DSL), the machine is
> operating fine in all mentioned cases.
>
> Does anyone have any pointers, I am currently stuck?
>
> Thank you,
>
> -Kemal.
>