Multiple Faxes

[Tom]

Is it possible to send multiple faxes using the fax
program in XP Home Edition ?
Thanks in Advance
TG

[Amethyst]

Tom wrote:
> Is it possible to send multiple faxes using the fax
> program in XP Home Edition ?
> Thanks in Advance
> TG

MVP Russ Valentine answered you in the print_fax group. Please do not cross
post to multiple (largely irrelevant) groups. This is a waste of bandwidth
and causes those of us trying to help to have to read the same message
multiple times (many of us monitor between 15 and 20 groups) If you /must/
cross-post then three or four groups is sufficient - please do so by
entering the group names in the same message header, separated by commas.
This will allow it to be read in several groups, without it appearing as a
"new" post in each to someone who has already read it in another group.

Thank you


--
Cassandra
Card carrying member of the Fresh Start Club 'The Undead Are People Too!'

Reply address is fake. Please send all praise, abuse, insults, bequests
of £1million to cassandra (at) craigy34 (dot) freeserve (dot) co (dot)
uk. Change the obvious to the obvious.
Private requests for assistance will not be acknowledged. Please post all
correspondence to the group so that all may benefit. Thank you.

[johnf]

That's a very odd statement!
When I read anything cross-posted, it automatically changes all the
cross-posted ones on the other NGs to 'read'.

I also find it odd for someone devoting 29 lines of wasted bandwidth, just
to complain about the self-same thing (8 of those lines consisting of
egotistical irrelevance.

--
Johnf

> Tom wrote:
>> Is it possible to send multiple faxes using the fax
>> program in XP Home Edition ?
>> Thanks in Advance
>> TG
>
> MVP Russ Valentine answered you in the print_fax group. Please do not
> cross post to multiple (largely irrelevant) groups. This is a waste of
> bandwidth and causes those of us trying to help to have to read the
> same message multiple times (many of us monitor between 15 and 20
> groups) If you /must/ cross-post then three or four groups is
> sufficient - please do so by entering the group names in the same
> message header, separated by commas. This will allow it to be read in
> several groups, without it appearing as a "new" post in each to someone
> who has already read it in another group.
>
> Thank you
>
>
> --
> Cassandra
> Card carrying member of the Fresh Start Club 'The Undead Are People
> Too!'
>
> Reply address is fake. Please send all praise, abuse, insults, bequests
> of £1million to cassandra (at) craigy34 (dot) freeserve (dot) co (dot)
> uk. Change the obvious to the obvious.
> Private requests for assistance will not be acknowledged. Please post
> all correspondence to the group so that all may benefit. Thank you.

[Tom]

Both points dooly noted.=20
But I have to say I agree with Johnf.
TG
>-----Original Message-----
>That's a very odd statement!
>When I read anything cross-posted, it automatically=20
changes all the
>cross-posted ones on the other NGs to 'read'.
>
>I also find it odd for someone devoting 29 lines of=20
wasted bandwidth, just
>to complain about the self-same thing (8 of those lines=20
consisting of
>egotistical irrelevance.
>
>--
>Johnf
>
>> Tom wrote:
>>> Is it possible to send multiple faxes using the fax
>>> program in XP Home Edition ?
>>> Thanks in Advance
>>> TG
>>
>> MVP Russ Valentine answered you in the print_fax=20
group. Please do not
>> cross post to multiple (largely irrelevant) groups.=20
This is a waste of
>> bandwidth and causes those of us trying to help to=20
have to read the
>> same message multiple times (many of us monitor=20
between 15 and 20
>> groups) If you /must/ cross-post then three or four=20
groups is
>> sufficient - please do so by entering the group names=20
in the same
>> message header, separated by commas. This will allow=20
it to be read in
>> several groups, without it appearing as a "new" post=20
in each to someone
>> who has already read it in another group.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cassandra
>> Card carrying member of the Fresh Start Club 'The=20
Undead Are People
>> Too!'
>>
>> Reply address is fake. Please send all praise, abuse,=20
insults, bequests
>> of =A31million to cassandra (at) craigy34 (dot)=20
freeserve (dot) co (dot)
>> uk. Change the obvious to the obvious.
>> Private requests for assistance will not be=20
acknowledged. Please post
>> all correspondence to the group so that all may=20
benefit. Thank you.
>
>
>.
>

[Kent W. England [MVP]]

Some people copy and paste the same message to multiple newsgroups, not
knowing how to properly cross-post in the web interface. (I think you
separate multiple newsgroup names with commas to cross-post in the web
interface.)

I call this bad behavior "multi-posting" to differentiate it from
cross-posting. You see the duplicate message in each newsgroup because
the messages are not linked by the cross-posting mechanism. So you have
to read the same message over and over and if you reply, the poor OP can
only see the reply in that one newsgroup instead of any.

Some people start new threads to reply to messages instead of using
reply. My special term for this bad behavior is "dumb". :-)

Microsoft is working on a new generation of the web interface to try to
reduce these bad behaviors. Until then (and after) we can encourage
folks to learn how to use Outlook Express to participate in newsgroups.

--
Kent W. England, Microsoft MVP for Windows



"johnf" > wrote in
message ...

> That's a very odd statement!
> When I read anything cross-posted, it automatically changes all the
> cross-posted ones on the other NGs to 'read'.
>
> I also find it odd for someone devoting 29 lines of wasted bandwidth,
just
> to complain about the self-same thing (8 of those lines consisting of
> egotistical irrelevance.
>
> --
> Johnf
>
> > Tom wrote:
> >> Is it possible to send multiple faxes using the fax
> >> program in XP Home Edition ?
> >> Thanks in Advance
> >> TG
> >
> > MVP Russ Valentine answered you in the print_fax group. Please do
not
> > cross post to multiple (largely irrelevant) groups. This is a waste
of
> > bandwidth and causes those of us trying to help to have to read the
> > same message multiple times (many of us monitor between 15 and 20
> > groups) If you /must/ cross-post then three or four groups is
> > sufficient - please do so by entering the group names in the same
> > message header, separated by commas. This will allow it to be read
in
> > several groups, without it appearing as a "new" post in each to
someone
> > who has already read it in another group.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cassandra
> > Card carrying member of the Fresh Start Club 'The Undead Are People
> > Too!'
> >
> > Reply address is fake. Please send all praise, abuse, insults,
bequests
> > of £1million to cassandra (at) craigy34 (dot) freeserve (dot) co
(dot)
> > uk. Change the obvious to the obvious.
> > Private requests for assistance will not be acknowledged. Please
post
> > all correspondence to the group so that all may benefit. Thank you.
>
>

[sqr]

If he wants to post 100 times who cares just let him live and learn.

sheesh.

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
"Kent W. England [MVP]" > wrote in message
...
> Some people copy and paste the same message to multiple newsgroups, not
> knowing how to properly cross-post in the web interface. (I think you
> separate multiple newsgroup names with commas to cross-post in the web
> interface.)
>
> I call this bad behavior "multi-posting" to differentiate it from
> cross-posting. You see the duplicate message in each newsgroup because
> the messages are not linked by the cross-posting mechanism. So you have
> to read the same message over and over and if you reply, the poor OP can
> only see the reply in that one newsgroup instead of any.
>
> Some people start new threads to reply to messages instead of using
> reply. My special term for this bad behavior is "dumb". :-)
>
> Microsoft is working on a new generation of the web interface to try to
> reduce these bad behaviors. Until then (and after) we can encourage
> folks to learn how to use Outlook Express to participate in newsgroups.
>
> --
> Kent W. England, Microsoft MVP for Windows
>
>
>
> "johnf" > wrote in
> message ...
>
> > That's a very odd statement!
> > When I read anything cross-posted, it automatically changes all the
> > cross-posted ones on the other NGs to 'read'.
> >
> > I also find it odd for someone devoting 29 lines of wasted bandwidth,
> just
> > to complain about the self-same thing (8 of those lines consisting of
> > egotistical irrelevance.
> >
> > --
> > Johnf
> >
> > > Tom wrote:
> > >> Is it possible to send multiple faxes using the fax
> > >> program in XP Home Edition ?
> > >> Thanks in Advance
> > >> TG
> > >
> > > MVP Russ Valentine answered you in the print_fax group. Please do
> not
> > > cross post to multiple (largely irrelevant) groups. This is a waste
> of
> > > bandwidth and causes those of us trying to help to have to read the
> > > same message multiple times (many of us monitor between 15 and 20
> > > groups) If you /must/ cross-post then three or four groups is
> > > sufficient - please do so by entering the group names in the same
> > > message header, separated by commas. This will allow it to be read
> in
> > > several groups, without it appearing as a "new" post in each to
> someone
> > > who has already read it in another group.
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cassandra
> > > Card carrying member of the Fresh Start Club 'The Undead Are People
> > > Too!'
> > >
> > > Reply address is fake. Please send all praise, abuse, insults,
> bequests
> > > of £1million to cassandra (at) craigy34 (dot) freeserve (dot) co
> (dot)
> > > uk. Change the obvious to the obvious.
> > > Private requests for assistance will not be acknowledged. Please
> post
> > > all correspondence to the group so that all may benefit. Thank you.
> >
> >
>

[Kadaitcha Man \[MVP - XP techno-retard police\]]

Kent W. England [MVP] wrote:
> Some people copy and paste the same message to multiple newsgroups,
> not knowing how to properly cross-post in the web interface. (I think
> you separate multiple newsgroup names with commas to cross-post in
> the web interface.)
>
> I call this bad behavior "multi-posting" to differentiate it from
> cross-posting. You see the duplicate message in each newsgroup because
> the messages are not linked by the cross-posting mechanism. So you
> have to read the same message over and over and if you reply, the
> poor OP can only see the reply in that one newsgroup instead of any.
>
> Some people start new threads to reply to messages instead of using
> reply. My special term for this bad behavior is "dumb". :-)
>
> Microsoft is working on a new generation of the web interface to try
> to reduce these bad behaviors. Until then (and after) we can encourage
> folks to learn how to use Outlook Express to participate in
> newsgroups.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! You ****ing faggot. Bad behaviour? BWAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!

--
Kadaitcha Man: Usenet Anarchist - http://kadaitcha.kicks-ass.org:83/
Anarchy is having to put up with things that **** you off.
MVP - Most Valueless Prostitute

[Kadaitcha Man \[MVP - XP techno-retard police\]]

Amethyst wrote:

> This is a waste of bandwidth

It sure ****ing is, fat-****.

--
Kadaitcha Man: Usenet Anarchist - http://kadaitcha.kicks-ass.org:83/
Anarchy is having to put up with things that **** you off.
MVP - Most Valueless Prostitute