XP sp2 Eval?

[Juan Delacosta]

anyone know of a way to get a xp sp2 eval cd?

[Gordon]

Juan Delacosta wrote:
> anyone know of a way to get a xp sp2 eval cd?

Don't think so, it's either SP2 or it's not........

[Jim Macklin]

Build a time machine and go back in time. Eval copies of
Windows XP pre-date SP2.

Invest in a computer company and become your own OEM, then
buy some from MS.

But you can get a free complete XP SP2 CD that will update
all versions of Windows XP, MS even pays the postage. This
is not an install CD eval, it is just an service pack
upgrade.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/updates/sp2/cdorder/en_us/default.mspx


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
| anyone know of a way to get a xp sp2 eval cd?
|
|

[Juan Delacosta]

if dont know what im talking about please dont post useless posts to me!

[Gordon]

Juan Delacosta wrote:
> if dont know what im talking about please dont post useless posts to
> me!

Who are you talking to?
Please quote the post you are replying to, as is Usenet custom.

Thankyou.

[Gordon]

Juan Delacosta wrote:
> Thank you for your post but the sp2 network install will not upgrade
> a eval cd i have sp1 eval cd right next to me.
>
> Ill ignore your post for the most part becuase you seem not to
> understand.
> Did I ask for a sp2 cd? no
>
> Thanks again for your time!

Plonk.

[Jim Macklin]

I assume you were talking to me, but since you snipped the
previous post.

I know what you want, you want a free copy of Windows XP
with SP2, which means you want a current version. You don't
want to pay for it because you're cheap. MS did issue eval
copies years ago so software authors could work with and
develop XP compatible software. That process stopped years
ago, hence my reference to a time machine.

I did tell you how to get SP2 on a CD, for free, which is
better than a eval copy that has a time limited EULA.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
| if dont know what im talking about please dont post
useless posts to me!
|
|

[Juan Delacosta]

Thank you for your post but the sp2 network install will not upgrade a eval
cd i have sp1 eval cd right next to me.

Ill ignore your post for the most part becuase you seem not to understand.

Did I ask for a sp2 cd? no

Thanks again for your time!

[Juan Delacosta]

gordon

as is custom the software shows clearly who i was talking to.

For you i will lay it out. this post was to you

btw why the useless posts??


"Gordon" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>> if dont know what im talking about please dont post useless posts to
>> me!
>
> Who are you talking to?
> Please quote the post you are replying to, as is Usenet custom.
>
> Thankyou.
>

[Juan Delacosta]

jim

since i have a eval sp1 copy next to me and i know mce 2005 has a eval also,
the refence to a time machine is ignored

i have a legit copy of xp, so the attack on me is also ignored since all
your trying to do is make a fight.

Thanks for your time!

note i didnt ask for a sp2 upgrade cd.



"Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
...
>I assume you were talking to me, but since you snipped the
> previous post.
>
> I know what you want, you want a free copy of Windows XP
> with SP2, which means you want a current version. You don't
> want to pay for it because you're cheap. MS did issue eval
> copies years ago so software authors could work with and
> develop XP compatible software. That process stopped years
> ago, hence my reference to a time machine.
>
> I did tell you how to get SP2 on a CD, for free, which is
> better than a eval copy that has a time limited EULA.
>
>
> --
> The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
> But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> message ...
> | if dont know what im talking about please dont post
> useless posts to me!
> |
> |
>
>

[Jim Macklin]

Eval CD were not ever intended to be upgraded, slipstreamed
or have in infinite life. It has expired, died, and it is
thus time to BUY a retail CD.
The fact that you have an eval CD means that either you were
at one time a software developer for MS and you have
forgotten how to contact MS or somebody gave or sold you
software illegally.

I do hope somebody can help you.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.



"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
| Thank you for your post but the sp2 network install will
not upgrade a eval
| cd i have sp1 eval cd right next to me.
|
| Ill ignore your post for the most part becuase you seem
not to understand.
|
| Did I ask for a sp2 cd? no
|
| Thanks again for your time!
|
|

[Juan Delacosta]

plonk???

what was that?

"Gordon" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>> Thank you for your post but the sp2 network install will not upgrade
>> a eval cd i have sp1 eval cd right next to me.
>>
>> Ill ignore your post for the most part becuase you seem not to
>> understand.
>> Did I ask for a sp2 cd? no
>>
>> Thanks again for your time!
>
> Plonk.
>

[XS11E]

"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
:

> plonk???
>
> what was that?

<plonk> means he's set his newsreader to ignore any more posts from
you, he won't see them. You've been added to his killfile or plonk
file as it's often called.

The hostile tone of your replies is what has earned you this treatment,
you might try and be more courteous in the future.

[Juan Delacosta]

recieved at a technet confence. one of the many i go too.

missed it in this area a while.




"Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
...
> Eval CD were not ever intended to be upgraded, slipstreamed
> or have in infinite life. It has expired, died, and it is
> thus time to BUY a retail CD.
> The fact that you have an eval CD means that either you were
> at one time a software developer for MS and you have
> forgotten how to contact MS or somebody gave or sold you
> software illegally.
>
> I do hope somebody can help you.
>
>
> --
> The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
> But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
>
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> message ...
> | Thank you for your post but the sp2 network install will
> not upgrade a eval
> | cd i have sp1 eval cd right next to me.
> |
> | Ill ignore your post for the most part becuase you seem
> not to understand.
> |
> | Did I ask for a sp2 cd? no
> |
> | Thanks again for your time!
> |
> |
>
>

[Jupiter Jones [MVP]]

They may be available in some Microsoft Press books, I am not sure if they
have updated to SP-2.
However it seems you actually need to buy Windows XP since apparently you
have exceeded the intended purpose of the evaluation versions.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
> recieved at a technet confence. one of the many i go too.
>
> missed it in this area a while.
>
>
>
>
> "Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Eval CD were not ever intended to be upgraded, slipstreamed
>> or have in infinite life. It has expired, died, and it is
>> thus time to BUY a retail CD.
>> The fact that you have an eval CD means that either you were
>> at one time a software developer for MS and you have
>> forgotten how to contact MS or somebody gave or sold you
>> software illegally.
>>
>> I do hope somebody can help you.
>>
>>
>> --
>> The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
>> But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
>> message ...
>> | Thank you for your post but the sp2 network install will
>> not upgrade a eval
>> | cd i have sp1 eval cd right next to me.
>> |
>> | Ill ignore your post for the most part becuase you seem
>> not to understand.
>> |
>> | Did I ask for a sp2 cd? no
>> |
>> | Thanks again for your time!
>> |
>> |
>>
>>
>
>

[Juan Delacosta]

did you notice i said i have a legit xp pro?

im looking for a eval sp2 order form for some demostration pcs.


"Jupiter Jones [MVP]" > wrote in message
...
> They may be available in some Microsoft Press books, I am not sure if they
> have updated to SP-2.
> However it seems you actually need to buy Windows XP since apparently you
> have exceeded the intended purpose of the evaluation versions.
>
> --
> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> ...
>> recieved at a technet confence. one of the many i go too.
>>
>> missed it in this area a while.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Eval CD were not ever intended to be upgraded, slipstreamed
>>> or have in infinite life. It has expired, died, and it is
>>> thus time to BUY a retail CD.
>>> The fact that you have an eval CD means that either you were
>>> at one time a software developer for MS and you have
>>> forgotten how to contact MS or somebody gave or sold you
>>> software illegally.
>>>
>>> I do hope somebody can help you.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
>>> But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
>>> message ...
>>> | Thank you for your post but the sp2 network install will
>>> not upgrade a eval
>>> | cd i have sp1 eval cd right next to me.
>>> |
>>> | Ill ignore your post for the most part becuase you seem
>>> not to understand.
>>> |
>>> | Did I ask for a sp2 cd? no
>>> |
>>> | Thanks again for your time!
>>> |
>>> |
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

[Jupiter Jones [MVP]]

Search the sources you used before.
Check the Microsoft Press books to see if those evaluation versions now
include SP-2.

You may need to contact Microsoft.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
> did you notice i said i have a legit xp pro?
>
> im looking for a eval sp2 order form for some demostration pcs.
>
>
> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" > wrote in message
> ...
>> They may be available in some Microsoft Press books, I am not sure if
>> they have updated to SP-2.
>> However it seems you actually need to buy Windows XP since apparently you
>> have exceeded the intended purpose of the evaluation versions.
>>
>> --
>> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
>> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/
>>
>>
>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> recieved at a technet confence. one of the many i go too.
>>>
>>> missed it in this area a while.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Eval CD were not ever intended to be upgraded, slipstreamed
>>>> or have in infinite life. It has expired, died, and it is
>>>> thus time to BUY a retail CD.
>>>> The fact that you have an eval CD means that either you were
>>>> at one time a software developer for MS and you have
>>>> forgotten how to contact MS or somebody gave or sold you
>>>> software illegally.
>>>>
>>>> I do hope somebody can help you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
>>>> But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
>>>> message ...
>>>> | Thank you for your post but the sp2 network install will
>>>> not upgrade a eval
>>>> | cd i have sp1 eval cd right next to me.
>>>> |
>>>> | Ill ignore your post for the most part becuase you seem
>>>> not to understand.
>>>> |
>>>> | Did I ask for a sp2 cd? no
>>>> |
>>>> | Thanks again for your time!
>>>> |
>>>> |
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

[Plato]

Juan Delacosta wrote:
>
> did you notice i said i have a legit xp pro?
>
> im looking for a eval sp2 order form for some demostration pcs.

Did
I
I'm

[Jim Macklin]

If you call MS or read the EULA on the CD, you'll see that
it time limited, after all, it is distributed for the
purpose of evaluation prior to purchase. Now that XP is a
well marketed retail product, the RTM version is soon to be
dropped from support, and the OEM and large corps have
finished their evaluations, the only eval versions would be
the long awaited Longhorn.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
| recieved at a technet confence. one of the many i go too.
|
| missed it in this area a while.
|
|
|
|
| "Jim Macklin" > wrote
in message
| ...
| > Eval CD were not ever intended to be upgraded,
slipstreamed
| > or have in infinite life. It has expired, died, and it
is
| > thus time to BUY a retail CD.
| > The fact that you have an eval CD means that either you
were
| > at one time a software developer for MS and you have
| > forgotten how to contact MS or somebody gave or sold you
| > software illegally.
| >
| > I do hope somebody can help you.
| >
| >
| > --
| > The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
| > But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
| >
| >
| >
| > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
| > message ...
| > | Thank you for your post but the sp2 network install
will
| > not upgrade a eval
| > | cd i have sp1 eval cd right next to me.
| > |
| > | Ill ignore your post for the most part becuase you
seem
| > not to understand.
| > |
| > | Did I ask for a sp2 cd? no
| > |
| > | Thanks again for your time!
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|

[Jim Macklin]

An eval version is legit for a limited time and purpose..
You can find your EULA for the installed eval version by
opening Windows Explorer/Help and clicking on the About
Windows link. On that page you'll see a link to YOUR EULA.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.


"Plato" <|@|.|> wrote in message
...
| Juan Delacosta wrote:
| >
| > did you notice i said i have a legit xp pro?
| >
| > im looking for a eval sp2 order form for some
demostration pcs.
|
| Did
| I
| I'm
|

[Jim Macklin]

Windows XP Setup and Deployment - Testing XP without
activation
.... it on another PC, you are in breach of the EULA. If you
require to install Windows
XP on another machine ... of other programs eg the 120-day
eval copy supplied as ...
www.mcse.ms/archive65-2004-2-436057.html - 11k -
Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages

TechNet Chat: Licensing Terminal Services in Windows 2000
and ...
.... away when License server is setup or after the 90 day
eval? ... A: Dennis: There are
no built-ins with Windows .NET ... Take a close read of the
EULA and you will find ...
www.microsoft.com/technet/community/
chats/trans/windowsts/ts0108.mspx - 43k - Cached - Similar
pages

From the first link above...

Dwayne,

The End User License Agreement (EULA) for Windows XP allows
for installation
to one PC per purchased license. This is irrespective of
activation or not.
If you take an existing copy of Window XP installed on a
current machine and
install it on another PC, you are in breach of the EULA.
If you require to install Windows XP on another machine you
either need to
purchase another license/copy or use one the 120-day
evaluation copies
supplied as part of other programs e.g. the 120-day eval
copy supplied as
part of a TechNet subscription


--
Regards,

Mike
--
Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no
rights

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.


"Plato" <|@|.|> wrote in message
...
| Juan Delacosta wrote:
| >
| > did you notice i said i have a legit xp pro?
| >
| > im looking for a eval sp2 order form for some
demostration pcs.
|
| Did
| I
| I'm
|

[wind3D]

I just love stuck up-the-ass computer technies like Jim. They think they
rule the world! Look outside your door -- Big and scary without a
keyboard, isn't it?


--
wind3D
------------------------------------------------------------------------
wind3D's Profile: http://forum.osnn.net/member.php?userid=6018
View this thread: http://forum.osnn.net/showthread.php?t=44102

[Ken Blake]

In ,
Juan Delacosta > typed:

> if dont know what im talking about please dont post useless
> posts to
> me!


What a nice polite person you are! I was about to answer your
question, but now I won't.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup

[Jim Macklin]

If I was a computer techie I might be earning a living. I
don't work for MS and although I support Bill Gates as a
businessman, I wish he supported the rights of the American
and other citizens around the world who have a right to keep
and bear arms. Mr. gates has spent his money to harm my
rights. But as an old geek, pilot, NRA member and American
citizen I choose to follow the law, rules and ethics as much
as possible. BTW, things only come out of my ass and you
and I really don't want to have any interaction with that.

BTW, where were you during the rest of this thread?


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.


"wind3D" > wrote in
message ...
|
| I just love stuck up-the-ass computer technies like Jim.
They think they
| rule the world! Look outside your door -- Big and scary
without a
| keyboard, isn't it?
|
|
| --
| wind3D
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| wind3D's Profile:
http://forum.osnn.net/member.php?userid=6018
| View this thread:
http://forum.osnn.net/showthread.php?t=44102
|

[Juan Delacosta]

thanks for your time.

guess mvps are worthless as i thought!


"Ken Blake" > wrote in message
...
> In ,
> Juan Delacosta > typed:
>
>> if dont know what im talking about please dont post useless posts to
>> me!
>
>
> What a nice polite person you are! I was about to answer your question,
> but now I won't.
>
> --
> Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> Please reply to the newsgroup
>

[Jim Macklin]

Why, because you were not told that it is OK to use a 120
day eval forever, for any use and you are unhappy because
your old eval copy doesn't entitle you to updates. You can
subscribe to the program and get eval copies. But you want
"free" and absolution for your sins.

BTW, I'm not an MVP, but I think they are quite useful.


--
Merry Christmas
Have a Safe and Happy New Year
Live Long and Prosper
Jim Macklin

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
| thanks for your time.
|
| guess mvps are worthless as i thought!
|
|
| "Ken Blake" > wrote in
message
| ...
| > In ,
| > Juan Delacosta > typed:
| >
| >> if dont know what im talking about please dont post
useless posts to
| >> me!
| >
| >
| > What a nice polite person you are! I was about to answer
your question,
| > but now I won't.
| >
| > --
| > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
| > Please reply to the newsgroup
| >
|
|

[Juan Delacosta]

i like how the responders accuse me of wrong doing. it was simple question
that should have a simple answer. if you do not have a answer then you need
not reply.

im trying to setup demo system for ppl to try out xp without them stealing
the keys ive had a few systems that had the keys stolen since there was not
activated.

but you would rather believe im doing something wrong so you keep up the
insane posts


"Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
...
> Why, because you were not told that it is OK to use a 120
> day eval forever, for any use and you are unhappy because
> your old eval copy doesn't entitle you to updates. You can
> subscribe to the program and get eval copies. But you want
> "free" and absolution for your sins.
>
> BTW, I'm not an MVP, but I think they are quite useful.
>
>
> --
> Merry Christmas
> Have a Safe and Happy New Year
> Live Long and Prosper
> Jim Macklin
>
> --
> The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
> But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> message ...
> | thanks for your time.
> |
> | guess mvps are worthless as i thought!
> |
> |
> | "Ken Blake" > wrote in
> message
> | ...
> | > In ,
> | > Juan Delacosta > typed:
> | >
> | >> if dont know what im talking about please dont post
> useless posts to
> | >> me!
> | >
> | >
> | > What a nice polite person you are! I was about to answer
> your question,
> | > but now I won't.
> | >
> | > --
> | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> | > Please reply to the newsgroup
> | >
> |
> |
>
>

[Jim Macklin]

You are doing something wrong, either re-subscribe to the
TechNet service, contact MS corporate hq and arrange a
license as an OEM, or buy retail or OEM media. Read the
EULA on the media you now have. You asked a question and
didn't like the answer, so you asked again. And again. And
you began the rudeness when the answers you got did not make
you happy.


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
|i like how the responders accuse me of wrong doing. it was
simple question
| that should have a simple answer. if you do not have a
answer then you need
| not reply.
|
| im trying to setup demo system for ppl to try out xp
without them stealing
| the keys ive had a few systems that had the keys stolen
since there was not
| activated.
|
| but you would rather believe im doing something wrong so
you keep up the
| insane posts
|
|
| "Jim Macklin" > wrote
in message
| ...
| > Why, because you were not told that it is OK to use a
120
| > day eval forever, for any use and you are unhappy
because
| > your old eval copy doesn't entitle you to updates. You
can
| > subscribe to the program and get eval copies. But you
want
| > "free" and absolution for your sins.
| >
| > BTW, I'm not an MVP, but I think they are quite useful.
| >
| >
| > --
| > Merry Christmas
| > Have a Safe and Happy New Year
| > Live Long and Prosper
| > Jim Macklin
| >
| > --
| > The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
| > But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
| >
| >
| > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
| > message ...
| > | thanks for your time.
| > |
| > | guess mvps are worthless as i thought!
| > |
| > |
| > | "Ken Blake" > wrote
in
| > message
| > | ...
| > | > In ,
| > | > Juan Delacosta > typed:
| > | >
| > | >> if dont know what im talking about please dont
post
| > useless posts to
| > | >> me!
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > What a nice polite person you are! I was about to
answer
| > your question,
| > | > but now I won't.
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
| > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|

[Alex Nichol]

Juan Delacosta wrote:

>Thank you for your post but the sp2 network install will not upgrade a eval
>cd i have sp1 eval cd right next to me.
>
>Ill ignore your post for the most part becuase you seem not to understand.

If you are running an eval version of XP in any production environment
you will not be able to install SP2 and should get a legitimate non-
eval copy and install it. They were provided for *evaluation*, not
production use and most are time bombed



--
Alex Nichol MS MVP (Windows Technologies)
Bournemouth, U.K. (remove the D8 bit)

[Juan Delacosta]

wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im looking for a
xp sp2 eval cd.

is it that hard to understand?




"Alex Nichol" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>
>>Thank you for your post but the sp2 network install will not upgrade a
>>eval
>>cd i have sp1 eval cd right next to me.
>>
>>Ill ignore your post for the most part becuase you seem not to understand.
>
> If you are running an eval version of XP in any production environment
> you will not be able to install SP2 and should get a legitimate non-
> eval copy and install it. They were provided for *evaluation*, not
> production use and most are time bombed
>
>
>
> --
> Alex Nichol MS MVP (Windows Technologies)
> Bournemouth, U.K. (remove the D8 bit)

[John Doue]

Juan Delacosta wrote:
> wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im looking for a
> xp sp2 eval cd.
>
> is it that hard to understand?
>
>

Yes, kind of. Why would there be an evaluation CD of SP2? Just download
the file (Ok, a fairly long download if you do not have a fast
connection) and install it. Then uninstall it if you are not satisfied.
--
John Doue

[Juan Delacosta]

jim

sorry for my rudeness but this hostility was your own doing. what do you
expect when people like you jim cant read and answer a simple question. if
you do not have a valid answer to the subject i presented. step out of the
thread.

i didnt ask to be accused of a crime or being put on a couch and anilized.

ill repeat if you do not have a productive comment to this thread, then you
need to leave it.







"Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
...
> You are doing something wrong, either re-subscribe to the
> TechNet service, contact MS corporate hq and arrange a
> license as an OEM, or buy retail or OEM media. Read the
> EULA on the media you now have. You asked a question and
> didn't like the answer, so you asked again. And again. And
> you began the rudeness when the answers you got did not make
> you happy.
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> message ...
> |i like how the responders accuse me of wrong doing. it was
> simple question
> | that should have a simple answer. if you do not have a
> answer then you need
> | not reply.
> |
> | im trying to setup demo system for ppl to try out xp
> without them stealing
> | the keys ive had a few systems that had the keys stolen
> since there was not
> | activated.
> |
> | but you would rather believe im doing something wrong so
> you keep up the
> | insane posts
> |
> |
> | "Jim Macklin" > wrote
> in message
> | ...
> | > Why, because you were not told that it is OK to use a
> 120
> | > day eval forever, for any use and you are unhappy
> because
> | > your old eval copy doesn't entitle you to updates. You
> can
> | > subscribe to the program and get eval copies. But you
> want
> | > "free" and absolution for your sins.
> | >
> | > BTW, I'm not an MVP, but I think they are quite useful.
> | >
> | >
> | > --
> | > Merry Christmas
> | > Have a Safe and Happy New Year
> | > Live Long and Prosper
> | > Jim Macklin
> | >
> | > --
> | > The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
> | > But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
> | >
> | >
> | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> | > message ...
> | > | thanks for your time.
> | > |
> | > | guess mvps are worthless as i thought!
> | > |
> | > |
> | > | "Ken Blake" > wrote
> in
> | > message
> | > | ...
> | > | > In ,
> | > | > Juan Delacosta > typed:
> | > | >
> | > | >> if dont know what im talking about please dont
> post
> | > useless posts to
> | > | >> me!
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | > What a nice polite person you are! I was about to
> answer
> | > your question,
> | > | > but now I won't.
> | > | >
> | > | > --
> | > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> | > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
> | > | >
> | > |
> | > |
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>

[Juan Delacosta]

John Doue

thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is please dont
comment.

this is not sp2 upgrade cd.

thanks for your time


"John Doue" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>> wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im looking
>> for a xp sp2 eval cd.
>>
>> is it that hard to understand?
>>
>>
>
> Yes, kind of. Why would there be an evaluation CD of SP2? Just download
> the file (Ok, a fairly long download if you do not have a fast connection)
> and install it. Then uninstall it if you are not satisfied.
> --
> John Doue

[John Doue]

Juan Delacosta wrote:

> John Doue
>
> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is please dont
> comment.
>
> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>

Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would need an "eval sp2" cd
when you already have a legit XP CD, then may be you would get more
satisfying answers ... Or may be what you actually need to make a
"slipstream" CD with SP2.
--
John Doue

[Jim Macklin]

Let's see, YOU know you got your eval version at an
invitation only TechNet seminar. Therefore you should know
that you have to subscribe to the TechNet service.
YOUR questions were unclear about what you have and what you
want, everybody read that you wanted SP2, the unknown part
that was poorly stated by YOU...
You have an eval copy of XP and you say you have a legit
copy of XP, IS THIS two different copies of XP? Eval copies
expire after 120 days, retail copies don't.
I can read very well, but I am not very good at guessing
what you want and guessing at your motivation and intentions
unless you are able to expand your question beyond a "I
want..." that is simply repeated again and again.

You have been told by everyone that eval copies expire and
are of limited use. I even did a few minutes research and
found some TechNet pages that directly addressed your
apparent question, Not only did I post the link, I copied
the pertinent text.

I think I will stop any further comments, perhaps block this
thread.


--
Merry Christmas
Have a Safe and Happy New Year
Live Long and Prosper
Jim Macklin
"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
| jim
|
| sorry for my rudeness but this hostility was your own
doing. what do you
| expect when people like you jim cant read and answer a
simple question. if
| you do not have a valid answer to the subject i presented.
step out of the
| thread.
|
| i didnt ask to be accused of a crime or being put on a
couch and anilized.
|
| ill repeat if you do not have a productive comment to this
thread, then you
| need to leave it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "Jim Macklin" > wrote
in message
| ...
| > You are doing something wrong, either re-subscribe to
the
| > TechNet service, contact MS corporate hq and arrange a
| > license as an OEM, or buy retail or OEM media. Read the
| > EULA on the media you now have. You asked a question
and
| > didn't like the answer, so you asked again. And again.
And
| > you began the rudeness when the answers you got did not
make
| > you happy.
| >
| >
| > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
| > message ...
| > |i like how the responders accuse me of wrong doing. it
was
| > simple question
| > | that should have a simple answer. if you do not have
a
| > answer then you need
| > | not reply.
| > |
| > | im trying to setup demo system for ppl to try out xp
| > without them stealing
| > | the keys ive had a few systems that had the keys
stolen
| > since there was not
| > | activated.
| > |
| > | but you would rather believe im doing something wrong
so
| > you keep up the
| > | insane posts
| > |
| > |
| > | "Jim Macklin" >
wrote
| > in message
| > | ...
| > | > Why, because you were not told that it is OK to use
a
| > 120
| > | > day eval forever, for any use and you are unhappy
| > because
| > | > your old eval copy doesn't entitle you to updates.
You
| > can
| > | > subscribe to the program and get eval copies. But
you
| > want
| > | > "free" and absolution for your sins.
| > | >
| > | > BTW, I'm not an MVP, but I think they are quite
useful.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Merry Christmas
| > | > Have a Safe and Happy New Year
| > | > Live Long and Prosper
| > | > Jim Macklin
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > The people think the Constitution protects their
rights;
| > | > But government sees it as an obstacle to be
overcome.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote
in
| > | > message
...
| > | > | thanks for your time.
| > | > |
| > | > | guess mvps are worthless as i thought!
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | > | "Ken Blake" >
wrote
| > in
| > | > message
| > | > | ...
| > | > | > In ,
| > | > | > Juan Delacosta >
typed:
| > | > | >
| > | > | >> if dont know what im talking about please dont
| > post
| > | > useless posts to
| > | > | >> me!
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > | > What a nice polite person you are! I was about
to
| > answer
| > | > your question,
| > | > | > but now I won't.
| > | > | >
| > | > | > --
| > | > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
| > | > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
| > | > | >
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|

[Juan Delacosta]

i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
the question was simple the answer cant be hard

i never asked for a upgrade cd.


"John Doue" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>
>> John Doue
>>
>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is please
>> dont comment.
>>
>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>
>
> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would need an "eval sp2" cd when
> you already have a legit XP CD, then may be you would get more satisfying
> answers ... Or may be what you actually need to make a "slipstream" CD
> with SP2.
> --
> John Doue

[Juan Delacosta]

you assumed that im doing something criminal. yes i have 2 copies one xp pro
retail which i upgraded to sp2 (i even slipstreamed it) and one sp1 eval.
(which wont slipstream). thus i would like to get a new copy

no guessing needed you assumed i was a criminal that is just your nature.

it was a very simple question with a simple answer .

ill repeat Does anyone know where to get a sp2 eval cd.


"Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
...
> Let's see, YOU know you got your eval version at an
> invitation only TechNet seminar. Therefore you should know
> that you have to subscribe to the TechNet service.
> YOUR questions were unclear about what you have and what you
> want, everybody read that you wanted SP2, the unknown part
> that was poorly stated by YOU...
> You have an eval copy of XP and you say you have a legit
> copy of XP, IS THIS two different copies of XP? Eval copies
> expire after 120 days, retail copies don't.
> I can read very well, but I am not very good at guessing
> what you want and guessing at your motivation and intentions
> unless you are able to expand your question beyond a "I
> want..." that is simply repeated again and again.
>
> You have been told by everyone that eval copies expire and
> are of limited use. I even did a few minutes research and
> found some TechNet pages that directly addressed your
> apparent question, Not only did I post the link, I copied
> the pertinent text.
>
> I think I will stop any further comments, perhaps block this
> thread.
>
>
> --
> Merry Christmas
> Have a Safe and Happy New Year
> Live Long and Prosper
> Jim Macklin
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> message ...
> | jim
> |
> | sorry for my rudeness but this hostility was your own
> doing. what do you
> | expect when people like you jim cant read and answer a
> simple question. if
> | you do not have a valid answer to the subject i presented.
> step out of the
> | thread.
> |
> | i didnt ask to be accused of a crime or being put on a
> couch and anilized.
> |
> | ill repeat if you do not have a productive comment to this
> thread, then you
> | need to leave it.
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | "Jim Macklin" > wrote
> in message
> | ...
> | > You are doing something wrong, either re-subscribe to
> the
> | > TechNet service, contact MS corporate hq and arrange a
> | > license as an OEM, or buy retail or OEM media. Read the
> | > EULA on the media you now have. You asked a question
> and
> | > didn't like the answer, so you asked again. And again.
> And
> | > you began the rudeness when the answers you got did not
> make
> | > you happy.
> | >
> | >
> | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> | > message ...
> | > |i like how the responders accuse me of wrong doing. it
> was
> | > simple question
> | > | that should have a simple answer. if you do not have
> a
> | > answer then you need
> | > | not reply.
> | > |
> | > | im trying to setup demo system for ppl to try out xp
> | > without them stealing
> | > | the keys ive had a few systems that had the keys
> stolen
> | > since there was not
> | > | activated.
> | > |
> | > | but you would rather believe im doing something wrong
> so
> | > you keep up the
> | > | insane posts
> | > |
> | > |
> | > | "Jim Macklin" >
> wrote
> | > in message
> | > | ...
> | > | > Why, because you were not told that it is OK to use
> a
> | > 120
> | > | > day eval forever, for any use and you are unhappy
> | > because
> | > | > your old eval copy doesn't entitle you to updates.
> You
> | > can
> | > | > subscribe to the program and get eval copies. But
> you
> | > want
> | > | > "free" and absolution for your sins.
> | > | >
> | > | > BTW, I'm not an MVP, but I think they are quite
> useful.
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | > --
> | > | > Merry Christmas
> | > | > Have a Safe and Happy New Year
> | > | > Live Long and Prosper
> | > | > Jim Macklin
> | > | >
> | > | > --
> | > | > The people think the Constitution protects their
> rights;
> | > | > But government sees it as an obstacle to be
> overcome.
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote
> in
> | > | > message
> ...
> | > | > | thanks for your time.
> | > | > |
> | > | > | guess mvps are worthless as i thought!
> | > | > |
> | > | > |
> | > | > | "Ken Blake" >
> wrote
> | > in
> | > | > message
> | > | > | ...
> | > | > | > In ,
> | > | > | > Juan Delacosta >
> typed:
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | >> if dont know what im talking about please dont
> | > post
> | > | > useless posts to
> | > | > | >> me!
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | > What a nice polite person you are! I was about
> to
> | > answer
> | > | > your question,
> | > | > | > but now I won't.
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | > --
> | > | > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> | > | > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
> | > | > | >
> | > | > |
> | > | > |
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > |
> | > |
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>

[Tom Pepper Willett]

You've made a lot of friends here. Good luck, troll.

"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
| you assumed that im doing something criminal. yes i have 2 copies one xp
pro
| retail which i upgraded to sp2 (i even slipstreamed it) and one sp1 eval.
| (which wont slipstream). thus i would like to get a new copy
|
| no guessing needed you assumed i was a criminal that is just your nature.
|
| it was a very simple question with a simple answer .
|
| ill repeat Does anyone know where to get a sp2 eval cd.
|
|
| "Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
| ...
| > Let's see, YOU know you got your eval version at an
| > invitation only TechNet seminar. Therefore you should know
| > that you have to subscribe to the TechNet service.
| > YOUR questions were unclear about what you have and what you
| > want, everybody read that you wanted SP2, the unknown part
| > that was poorly stated by YOU...
| > You have an eval copy of XP and you say you have a legit
| > copy of XP, IS THIS two different copies of XP? Eval copies
| > expire after 120 days, retail copies don't.
| > I can read very well, but I am not very good at guessing
| > what you want and guessing at your motivation and intentions
| > unless you are able to expand your question beyond a "I
| > want..." that is simply repeated again and again.
| >
| > You have been told by everyone that eval copies expire and
| > are of limited use. I even did a few minutes research and
| > found some TechNet pages that directly addressed your
| > apparent question, Not only did I post the link, I copied
| > the pertinent text.
| >
| > I think I will stop any further comments, perhaps block this
| > thread.
| >
| >
| > --
| > Merry Christmas
| > Have a Safe and Happy New Year
| > Live Long and Prosper
| > Jim Macklin
| > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
| > message ...
| > | jim
| > |
| > | sorry for my rudeness but this hostility was your own
| > doing. what do you
| > | expect when people like you jim cant read and answer a
| > simple question. if
| > | you do not have a valid answer to the subject i presented.
| > step out of the
| > | thread.
| > |
| > | i didnt ask to be accused of a crime or being put on a
| > couch and anilized.
| > |
| > | ill repeat if you do not have a productive comment to this
| > thread, then you
| > | need to leave it.
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > | "Jim Macklin" > wrote
| > in message
| > | ...
| > | > You are doing something wrong, either re-subscribe to
| > the
| > | > TechNet service, contact MS corporate hq and arrange a
| > | > license as an OEM, or buy retail or OEM media. Read the
| > | > EULA on the media you now have. You asked a question
| > and
| > | > didn't like the answer, so you asked again. And again.
| > And
| > | > you began the rudeness when the answers you got did not
| > make
| > | > you happy.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
| > | > message ...
| > | > |i like how the responders accuse me of wrong doing. it
| > was
| > | > simple question
| > | > | that should have a simple answer. if you do not have
| > a
| > | > answer then you need
| > | > | not reply.
| > | > |
| > | > | im trying to setup demo system for ppl to try out xp
| > | > without them stealing
| > | > | the keys ive had a few systems that had the keys
| > stolen
| > | > since there was not
| > | > | activated.
| > | > |
| > | > | but you would rather believe im doing something wrong
| > so
| > | > you keep up the
| > | > | insane posts
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | > | "Jim Macklin" >
| > wrote
| > | > in message
| > | > | ...
| > | > | > Why, because you were not told that it is OK to use
| > a
| > | > 120
| > | > | > day eval forever, for any use and you are unhappy
| > | > because
| > | > | > your old eval copy doesn't entitle you to updates.
| > You
| > | > can
| > | > | > subscribe to the program and get eval copies. But
| > you
| > | > want
| > | > | > "free" and absolution for your sins.
| > | > | >
| > | > | > BTW, I'm not an MVP, but I think they are quite
| > useful.
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > | > --
| > | > | > Merry Christmas
| > | > | > Have a Safe and Happy New Year
| > | > | > Live Long and Prosper
| > | > | > Jim Macklin
| > | > | >
| > | > | > --
| > | > | > The people think the Constitution protects their
| > rights;
| > | > | > But government sees it as an obstacle to be
| > overcome.
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote
| > in
| > | > | > message
| > ...
| > | > | > | thanks for your time.
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | guess mvps are worthless as i thought!
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | "Ken Blake" >
| > wrote
| > | > in
| > | > | > message
| > | > | > | ...
| > | > | > | > In ,
| > | > | > | > Juan Delacosta >
| > typed:
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | >> if dont know what im talking about please dont
| > | > post
| > | > | > useless posts to
| > | > | > | >> me!
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > What a nice polite person you are! I was about
| > to
| > | > answer
| > | > | > your question,
| > | > | > | > but now I won't.
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > --
| > | > | > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
| > | > | > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > |
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|

[Tom]

"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
> you assumed that im doing something criminal. yes i have 2 copies one xp
> pro retail which i upgraded to sp2 (i even slipstreamed it) and one sp1
> eval.
> (which wont slipstream). thus i would like to get a new copy

If you've already upgrqaded to SP2, then why in the hell do you want an eval
(which needs to be obtained from technet). You have been very unclear here,
and have gotten patient kind answers to your obtuse questions. Since you
just stated you have SP2, an SP2 eval is a moot point, and you should be
ignored totally for any further assistance!

>
> no guessing needed you assumed i was a criminal that is just your nature.

Not nature, using logic!

>
> it was a very simple question with a simple answer .

Apparently, you seem to be the only one understanding your intent in this
thread, that should be indicative that you obfuscated your entire intention
here.

>
> ill repeat Does anyone know where to get a sp2 eval cd.

Well, go somewhere else and search, since you have more time to flame others
for giving you answers to your vague questions.

[Jupiter Jones [MVP]]

"the question was simple"
So is the answer, contact Microsoft directly.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
> the question was simple the answer cant be hard
>
> i never asked for a upgrade cd.
>
>
> "John Doue" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>
>>> John Doue
>>>
>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is please
>>> dont comment.
>>>
>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would need an "eval sp2" cd when
>> you already have a legit XP CD, then may be you would get more satisfying
>> answers ... Or may be what you actually need to make a "slipstream" CD
>> with SP2.
>> --
>> John Doue
>
>

[Ken Blake]

In ,
Juan Delacosta > typed:

>i like how the responders accuse me of wrong doing. it was
>simple
> question that should have a simple answer. if you do not have
> a
> answer then you need not reply.


I, for one, did not accuse you of any wrong-doing. The only thing
I accused you of was rudeness.

And that you were. It's not wise to look for help and be rude to
those trying to help you. It turns *everyone* off, not just the
person you're rude to.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup


> "Jim Macklin" > wrote in
> message
> ...
>> Why, because you were not told that it is OK to use a 120
>> day eval forever, for any use and you are unhappy because
>> your old eval copy doesn't entitle you to updates. You can
>> subscribe to the program and get eval copies. But you want
>> "free" and absolution for your sins.
>>
>> BTW, I'm not an MVP, but I think they are quite useful.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Merry Christmas
>> Have a Safe and Happy New Year
>> Live Long and Prosper
>> Jim Macklin
>>
>> --
>> The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
>> But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
>>
>>
>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
>> message ...
>> | thanks for your time.
>> |
>> | guess mvps are worthless as i thought!
>> |
>> |
>> | "Ken Blake" > wrote in
>> message
>> | ...
>> | > In ,
>> | > Juan Delacosta > typed:
>> | >
>> | >> if dont know what im talking about please dont post
>> useless posts to
>> | >> me!
>> | >
>> | >
>> | > What a nice polite person you are! I was about to answer
>> your question,
>> | > but now I won't.
>> | >
>> | > --
>> | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
>> | > Please reply to the newsgroup

[Ken Blake]

In ,
Juan Delacosta > typed:

>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
> the question was simple the answer cant be hard


You don't need to clarify anything. You've already clarified the
only thing of importance here--that you are rude to those trying
to help you.

To repeat--that's a not a way calculated to get you the answers
you need.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup


> "John Doue" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>
>>> John Doue
>>>
>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd
>>> is
>>> please dont comment.
>>>
>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would need an "eval
>> sp2" cd
>> when you already have a legit XP CD, then may be you would get
>> more
>> satisfying answers ... Or may be what you actually need to
>> make a
>> "slipstream" CD with SP2.
>> --
>> John Doue

[Juan Delacosta]

what was so hard to understand?

anyone know of a way to get a xp sp2 eval cd?

its only people reading into the topic that are confusing things.

thanks for your time!



"Tom" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> ...
>> you assumed that im doing something criminal. yes i have 2 copies one xp
>> pro retail which i upgraded to sp2 (i even slipstreamed it) and one sp1
>> eval.
>> (which wont slipstream). thus i would like to get a new copy
>
> If you've already upgrqaded to SP2, then why in the hell do you want an
> eval (which needs to be obtained from technet). You have been very unclear
> here, and have gotten patient kind answers to your obtuse questions. Since
> you just stated you have SP2, an SP2 eval is a moot point, and you should
> be ignored totally for any further assistance!
>
>>
>> no guessing needed you assumed i was a criminal that is just your nature.
>
> Not nature, using logic!
>
>>
>> it was a very simple question with a simple answer .
>
> Apparently, you seem to be the only one understanding your intent in this
> thread, that should be indicative that you obfuscated your entire
> intention here.
>
>>
>> ill repeat Does anyone know where to get a sp2 eval cd.
>
> Well, go somewhere else and search, since you have more time to flame
> others for giving you answers to your vague questions.
>
>

[Juan Delacosta]

this statement would be true if people was helping me instead of baseless
accusations

they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the topic but the answer to a
non releated topic they would like to answer

if you do not have a valid answer then you need not reply


"Ken Blake" > wrote in message
...
> In ,
> Juan Delacosta > typed:
>
>>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
>> the question was simple the answer cant be hard
>
>
> You don't need to clarify anything. You've already clarified the only
> thing of importance here--that you are rude to those trying to help you.
>
> To repeat--that's a not a way calculated to get you the answers you need.
>
> --
> Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> Please reply to the newsgroup
>
>
>> "John Doue" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>>
>>>> John Doue
>>>>
>>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is
>>>> please dont comment.
>>>>
>>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would need an "eval sp2" cd
>>> when you already have a legit XP CD, then may be you would get more
>>> satisfying answers ... Or may be what you actually need to make a
>>> "slipstream" CD with SP2.
>>> --
>>> John Doue
>
>

[Jupiter Jones [MVP]]

What did Microsoft say when you contacted them directly?

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
> this statement would be true if people was helping me instead of baseless
> accusations
>
> they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the topic but the answer to
> a non releated topic they would like to answer
>
> if you do not have a valid answer then you need not reply

[Tom Pepper Willett]

What was so hard to understand?

Your question.

But, what is *not* hard to understand is your rudeness and your attitude.


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
| what was so hard to understand?
|
| anyone know of a way to get a xp sp2 eval cd?
|
| its only people reading into the topic that are confusing things.
|
| thanks for your time!
|
|
|
| "Tom" > wrote in message
| ...
| >
| > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
| > ...
| >> you assumed that im doing something criminal. yes i have 2 copies one
xp
| >> pro retail which i upgraded to sp2 (i even slipstreamed it) and one sp1
| >> eval.
| >> (which wont slipstream). thus i would like to get a new copy
| >
| > If you've already upgrqaded to SP2, then why in the hell do you want an
| > eval (which needs to be obtained from technet). You have been very
unclear
| > here, and have gotten patient kind answers to your obtuse questions.
Since
| > you just stated you have SP2, an SP2 eval is a moot point, and you
should
| > be ignored totally for any further assistance!
| >
| >>
| >> no guessing needed you assumed i was a criminal that is just your
nature.
| >
| > Not nature, using logic!
| >
| >>
| >> it was a very simple question with a simple answer .
| >
| > Apparently, you seem to be the only one understanding your intent in
this
| > thread, that should be indicative that you obfuscated your entire
| > intention here.
| >
| >>
| >> ill repeat Does anyone know where to get a sp2 eval cd.
| >
| > Well, go somewhere else and search, since you have more time to flame
| > others for giving you answers to your vague questions.
| >
| >
|
|

[Tom Pepper Willett]

You don't have a valid question, troll.

"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
| this statement would be true if people was helping me instead of baseless
| accusations
|
| they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the topic but the answer to
a
| non releated topic they would like to answer
|
| if you do not have a valid answer then you need not reply
|
|
| "Ken Blake" > wrote in message
| ...
| > In ,
| > Juan Delacosta > typed:
| >
| >>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
| >> the question was simple the answer cant be hard
| >
| >
| > You don't need to clarify anything. You've already clarified the only
| > thing of importance here--that you are rude to those trying to help you.
| >
| > To repeat--that's a not a way calculated to get you the answers you
need.
| >
| > --
| > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
| > Please reply to the newsgroup
| >
| >
| >> "John Doue" > wrote in message
| >> ...
| >>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
| >>>
| >>>> John Doue
| >>>>
| >>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is
| >>>> please dont comment.
| >>>>
| >>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
| >>>>
| >>>
| >>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would need an "eval sp2" cd
| >>> when you already have a legit XP CD, then may be you would get more
| >>> satisfying answers ... Or may be what you actually need to make a
| >>> "slipstream" CD with SP2.
| >>> --
| >>> John Doue
| >
| >
|
|

[Juan Delacosta]

i will tommorow but what good is this newsgroup if all your answers can be
found on the webpage and directly to contacting microsoft. as a mvp you
should be knowlegable enough to answer the question and not pass the buck.

but i didnt expect anything less




"Jupiter Jones [MVP]" > wrote in message
...
> What did Microsoft say when you contacted them directly?
>
> --
> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> ...
>> this statement would be true if people was helping me instead of baseless
>> accusations
>>
>> they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the topic but the answer to
>> a non releated topic they would like to answer
>>
>> if you do not have a valid answer then you need not reply
>
>

[Juan Delacosta]

"what is *not* hard to understand is your rudeness and your attitude."

enjoy every minute

dont worry ill make more

:)

"Tom Pepper Willett" > wrote in message
...
> What was so hard to understand?
>
> Your question.
>
> But, what is *not* hard to understand is your rudeness and your attitude.
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> ...
> | what was so hard to understand?
> |
> | anyone know of a way to get a xp sp2 eval cd?
> |
> | its only people reading into the topic that are confusing things.
> |
> | thanks for your time!
> |
> |
> |
> | "Tom" > wrote in message
> | ...
> | >
> | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> | > ...
> | >> you assumed that im doing something criminal. yes i have 2 copies one
> xp
> | >> pro retail which i upgraded to sp2 (i even slipstreamed it) and one
> sp1
> | >> eval.
> | >> (which wont slipstream). thus i would like to get a new copy
> | >
> | > If you've already upgrqaded to SP2, then why in the hell do you want
> an
> | > eval (which needs to be obtained from technet). You have been very
> unclear
> | > here, and have gotten patient kind answers to your obtuse questions.
> Since
> | > you just stated you have SP2, an SP2 eval is a moot point, and you
> should
> | > be ignored totally for any further assistance!
> | >
> | >>
> | >> no guessing needed you assumed i was a criminal that is just your
> nature.
> | >
> | > Not nature, using logic!
> | >
> | >>
> | >> it was a very simple question with a simple answer .
> | >
> | > Apparently, you seem to be the only one understanding your intent in
> this
> | > thread, that should be indicative that you obfuscated your entire
> | > intention here.
> | >
> | >>
> | >> ill repeat Does anyone know where to get a sp2 eval cd.
> | >
> | > Well, go somewhere else and search, since you have more time to flame
> | > others for giving you answers to your vague questions.
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>

[Juan Delacosta]

troll is what you call people who jump in a topic and dont give valid
infomation. they want to derail the topic or attack which you did very well.

since i created the topic that would make you the troll.


"Tom Pepper Willett" > wrote in message
...
> You don't have a valid question, troll.
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> ...
> | this statement would be true if people was helping me instead of
> baseless
> | accusations
> |
> | they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the topic but the answer
> to
> a
> | non releated topic they would like to answer
> |
> | if you do not have a valid answer then you need not reply
> |
> |
> | "Ken Blake" > wrote in message
> | ...
> | > In ,
> | > Juan Delacosta > typed:
> | >
> | >>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
> | >> the question was simple the answer cant be hard
> | >
> | >
> | > You don't need to clarify anything. You've already clarified the only
> | > thing of importance here--that you are rude to those trying to help
> you.
> | >
> | > To repeat--that's a not a way calculated to get you the answers you
> need.
> | >
> | > --
> | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> | > Please reply to the newsgroup
> | >
> | >
> | >> "John Doue" > wrote in message
> | >> ...
> | >>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
> | >>>
> | >>>> John Doue
> | >>>>
> | >>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is
> | >>>> please dont comment.
> | >>>>
> | >>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
> | >>>>
> | >>>
> | >>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would need an "eval sp2" cd
> | >>> when you already have a legit XP CD, then may be you would get more
> | >>> satisfying answers ... Or may be what you actually need to make a
> | >>> "slipstream" CD with SP2.
> | >>> --
> | >>> John Doue
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>

[Jim Macklin]

An MVP is NOT a business agent for or a spokesperson for MS.
It is not tech support. How did you get invited to the
seminar where you were "given" the eval copy you have now?
Get invited again and maybe they will have an SP2 eval for
you, if you ask nicely.


--
Merry Christmas
Have a Safe and Happy New Year
Live Long and Prosper
Jim Macklin
"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
|i will tommorow but what good is this newsgroup if all your
answers can be
| found on the webpage and directly to contacting microsoft.
as a mvp you
| should be knowlegable enough to answer the question and
not pass the buck.
|
| but i didnt expect anything less
|
|
|
|
| "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" > wrote
in message
| ...
| > What did Microsoft say when you contacted them directly?
| >
| > --
| > Jupiter Jones [MVP]
| > http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/
| >
| >
| > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message
| > ...
| >> this statement would be true if people was helping me
instead of baseless
| >> accusations
| >>
| >> they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the topic
but the answer to
| >> a non releated topic they would like to answer
| >>
| >> if you do not have a valid answer then you need not
reply
| >
| >
|
|

[Jim Macklin]

Now, that makes you a jerk, gee now I'm being rude.


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
| troll is what you call people who jump in a topic and dont
give valid
| infomation. they want to derail the topic or attack which
you did very well.
|
| since i created the topic that would make you the troll.
|
|
| "Tom Pepper Willett" > wrote in message
| ...
| > You don't have a valid question, troll.
| >
| > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message
| > ...
| > | this statement would be true if people was helping me
instead of
| > baseless
| > | accusations
| > |
| > | they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the
topic but the answer
| > to
| > a
| > | non releated topic they would like to answer
| > |
| > | if you do not have a valid answer then you need not
reply
| > |
| > |
| > | "Ken Blake" > wrote
in message
| > | ...
| > | > In ,
| > | > Juan Delacosta > typed:
| > | >
| > | >>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
| > | >> the question was simple the answer cant be hard
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > You don't need to clarify anything. You've already
clarified the only
| > | > thing of importance here--that you are rude to those
trying to help
| > you.
| > | >
| > | > To repeat--that's a not a way calculated to get you
the answers you
| > need.
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
| > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >> "John Doue" > wrote in message
| > | >> ...
| > | >>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
| > | >>>
| > | >>>> John Doue
| > | >>>>
| > | >>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a
eval sp2 cd is
| > | >>>> please dont comment.
| > | >>>>
| > | >>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
| > | >>>>
| > | >>>
| > | >>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would
need an "eval sp2" cd
| > | >>> when you already have a legit XP CD, then may be
you would get more
| > | >>> satisfying answers ... Or may be what you actually
need to make a
| > | >>> "slipstream" CD with SP2.
| > | >>> --
| > | >>> John Doue
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|

[Tom Pepper Willett]

ROFL.

You seriously don't get it, do you.
Notice that you aren't getting any answers?
People here don't like attitude and trolls.

"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
| troll is what you call people who jump in a topic and dont give valid
| infomation. they want to derail the topic or attack which you did very
well.
|
| since i created the topic that would make you the troll.
|
|
| "Tom Pepper Willett" > wrote in message
| ...
| > You don't have a valid question, troll.
| >
| > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
| > ...
| > | this statement would be true if people was helping me instead of
| > baseless
| > | accusations
| > |
| > | they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the topic but the answer
| > to
| > a
| > | non releated topic they would like to answer
| > |
| > | if you do not have a valid answer then you need not reply
| > |
| > |
| > | "Ken Blake" > wrote in message
| > | ...
| > | > In ,
| > | > Juan Delacosta > typed:
| > | >
| > | >>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
| > | >> the question was simple the answer cant be hard
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > You don't need to clarify anything. You've already clarified the
only
| > | > thing of importance here--that you are rude to those trying to help
| > you.
| > | >
| > | > To repeat--that's a not a way calculated to get you the answers you
| > need.
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
| > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >> "John Doue" > wrote in message
| > | >> ...
| > | >>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
| > | >>>
| > | >>>> John Doue
| > | >>>>
| > | >>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is
| > | >>>> please dont comment.
| > | >>>>
| > | >>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
| > | >>>>
| > | >>>
| > | >>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would need an "eval sp2"
cd
| > | >>> when you already have a legit XP CD, then may be you would get
more
| > | >>> satisfying answers ... Or may be what you actually need to make a
| > | >>> "slipstream" CD with SP2.
| > | >>> --
| > | >>> John Doue
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|

[Jupiter Jones [MVP]]

Juan;
Just because the answer is not what you wanted does not indicate badly on
this newsgroup.
Often the solution is pointing the person in the correct direction.
You have been given several possible solutions seemingly ignored by you.

It has been suggested you contact Microsoft, your original source, purchase
books as well as other options, most you seem to ignore perhaps because the
answers are not to your liking.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/


"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
>i will tommorow but what good is this newsgroup if all your answers can be
>found on the webpage and directly to contacting microsoft. as a mvp you
>should be knowlegable enough to answer the question and not pass the buck.
>
> but i didnt expect anything less
>
>
>
>
> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" > wrote in message
> ...
>> What did Microsoft say when you contacted them directly?
>>
>> --
>> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
>> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/
>>
>>
>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> this statement would be true if people was helping me instead of
>>> baseless accusations
>>>
>>> they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the topic but the answer
>>> to a non releated topic they would like to answer
>>>
>>> if you do not have a valid answer then you need not reply
>>
>>
>
>

[Al Smith]

> what was so hard to understand?
>
> anyone know of a way to get a xp sp2 eval cd?

You misspelled "evil". :-)

[Juan Delacosta]

maybe i did mispell, everyone else is telling me what i should think or ask.

hmmmm

"sp2 evil cd" <<<< i like

"Al Smith" > wrote in message
...
>> what was so hard to understand?
>>
>> anyone know of a way to get a xp sp2 eval cd?
>
> You misspelled "evil". :-)

[Juan Delacosta]

jim

i missded the quarterly confence and was hopeing before 3 months to get one,
guess ill have to wait

sorry jim for my rudeness but all i saw was attacks i react to those
attacks.





"Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
...
> An MVP is NOT a business agent for or a spokesperson for MS.
> It is not tech support. How did you get invited to the
> seminar where you were "given" the eval copy you have now?
> Get invited again and maybe they will have an SP2 eval for
> you, if you ask nicely.
>
>
> --
> Merry Christmas
> Have a Safe and Happy New Year
> Live Long and Prosper
> Jim Macklin
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> message ...
> |i will tommorow but what good is this newsgroup if all your
> answers can be
> | found on the webpage and directly to contacting microsoft.
> as a mvp you
> | should be knowlegable enough to answer the question and
> not pass the buck.
> |
> | but i didnt expect anything less
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" > wrote
> in message
> | ...
> | > What did Microsoft say when you contacted them directly?
> | >
> | > --
> | > Jupiter Jones [MVP]
> | > http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/
> | >
> | >
> | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> message
> | > ...
> | >> this statement would be true if people was helping me
> instead of baseless
> | >> accusations
> | >>
> | >> they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the topic
> but the answer to
> | >> a non releated topic they would like to answer
> | >>
> | >> if you do not have a valid answer then you need not
> reply
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>

[Juan Delacosta]

jupiter jones

i was given no posible answers, i was given attacks on my creditbility. as
for my original source i got it (sp1 eval) at a micosoft confence, which i
told you i couldnt attend this quarter. so thanks for not reading and just
assuming. even if i did get one i was looking for 8-10 copies for demo
machines.

the possible solutions were not valid solutions to the "sp2 eval cd". i was
not looking for a sp2 upgrade cd. a link to a 2000 termanal server issue was
not a sp2 eval cd. the endless baiting by you was not a sp2 eval cd.

sorry for my rudness but i spent time searching the website and couldnt find
i hoped that posting this topic to get knowlegable people to help out. sorry
for wasting you valuable time.

juan


"Jupiter Jones [MVP]" > wrote in message
...
> Juan;
> Just because the answer is not what you wanted does not indicate badly on
> this newsgroup.
> Often the solution is pointing the person in the correct direction.
> You have been given several possible solutions seemingly ignored by you.
>
> It has been suggested you contact Microsoft, your original source,
> purchase books as well as other options, most you seem to ignore perhaps
> because the answers are not to your liking.
>
> --
> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> ...
>>i will tommorow but what good is this newsgroup if all your answers can be
>>found on the webpage and directly to contacting microsoft. as a mvp you
>>should be knowlegable enough to answer the question and not pass the buck.
>>
>> but i didnt expect anything less
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> What did Microsoft say when you contacted them directly?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
>>> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/
>>>
>>>
>>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> this statement would be true if people was helping me instead of
>>>> baseless accusations
>>>>
>>>> they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the topic but the answer
>>>> to a non releated topic they would like to answer
>>>>
>>>> if you do not have a valid answer then you need not reply
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

[Juan Delacosta]

sorry jim for getting on your back side


"Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
...
> Now, that makes you a jerk, gee now I'm being rude.
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> message ...
> | troll is what you call people who jump in a topic and dont
> give valid
> | infomation. they want to derail the topic or attack which
> you did very well.
> |
> | since i created the topic that would make you the troll.
> |
> |
> | "Tom Pepper Willett" > wrote in message
> | ...
> | > You don't have a valid question, troll.
> | >
> | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> message
> | > ...
> | > | this statement would be true if people was helping me
> instead of
> | > baseless
> | > | accusations
> | > |
> | > | they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the
> topic but the answer
> | > to
> | > a
> | > | non releated topic they would like to answer
> | > |
> | > | if you do not have a valid answer then you need not
> reply
> | > |
> | > |
> | > | "Ken Blake" > wrote
> in message
> | > | ...
> | > | > In ,
> | > | > Juan Delacosta > typed:
> | > | >
> | > | >>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
> | > | >> the question was simple the answer cant be hard
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | > You don't need to clarify anything. You've already
> clarified the only
> | > | > thing of importance here--that you are rude to those
> trying to help
> | > you.
> | > | >
> | > | > To repeat--that's a not a way calculated to get you
> the answers you
> | > need.
> | > | >
> | > | > --
> | > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> | > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >> "John Doue" > wrote in message
> | > | >> ...
> | > | >>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
> | > | >>>
> | > | >>>> John Doue
> | > | >>>>
> | > | >>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a
> eval sp2 cd is
> | > | >>>> please dont comment.
> | > | >>>>
> | > | >>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
> | > | >>>>
> | > | >>>
> | > | >>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would
> need an "eval sp2" cd
> | > | >>> when you already have a legit XP CD, then may be
> you would get more
> | > | >>> satisfying answers ... Or may be what you actually
> need to make a
> | > | >>> "slipstream" CD with SP2.
> | > | >>> --
> | > | >>> John Doue
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > |
> | > |
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>

[Juan Delacosta]

sorry for getting on your back side but i was not trolling


"Tom Pepper Willett" > wrote in message
...
> ROFL.
>
> You seriously don't get it, do you.
> Notice that you aren't getting any answers?
> People here don't like attitude and trolls.
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> ...
> | troll is what you call people who jump in a topic and dont give valid
> | infomation. they want to derail the topic or attack which you did very
> well.
> |
> | since i created the topic that would make you the troll.
> |
> |
> | "Tom Pepper Willett" > wrote in message
> | ...
> | > You don't have a valid question, troll.
> | >
> | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> | > ...
> | > | this statement would be true if people was helping me instead of
> | > baseless
> | > | accusations
> | > |
> | > | they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the topic but the
> answer
> | > to
> | > a
> | > | non releated topic they would like to answer
> | > |
> | > | if you do not have a valid answer then you need not reply
> | > |
> | > |
> | > | "Ken Blake" > wrote in message
> | > | ...
> | > | > In ,
> | > | > Juan Delacosta > typed:
> | > | >
> | > | >>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
> | > | >> the question was simple the answer cant be hard
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | > You don't need to clarify anything. You've already clarified the
> only
> | > | > thing of importance here--that you are rude to those trying to
> help
> | > you.
> | > | >
> | > | > To repeat--that's a not a way calculated to get you the answers
> you
> | > need.
> | > | >
> | > | > --
> | > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> | > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | >> "John Doue" > wrote in message
> | > | >> ...
> | > | >>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
> | > | >>>
> | > | >>>> John Doue
> | > | >>>>
> | > | >>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd
> is
> | > | >>>> please dont comment.
> | > | >>>>
> | > | >>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
> | > | >>>>
> | > | >>>
> | > | >>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would need an "eval
> sp2"
> cd
> | > | >>> when you already have a legit XP CD, then may be you would get
> more
> | > | >>> satisfying answers ... Or may be what you actually need to make
> a
> | > | >>> "slipstream" CD with SP2.
> | > | >>> --
> | > | >>> John Doue
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > |
> | > |
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>

[Jim Macklin]

How do you contact MS to reserve a space at the next
conference? Maybe you could use that method and request a
CD? In effect, at all large corporations, each division
works best when you contact the correct office. A newsgroup
that is only related to the business because the company
provides the bandwidth is not the path to contact the
business side of a department.


--
Merry Christmas
Have a Safe and Happy New Year
Live Long and Prosper
Jim Macklin
"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
| jim
|
| i missded the quarterly confence and was hopeing before 3
months to get one,
| guess ill have to wait
|
| sorry jim for my rudeness but all i saw was attacks i
react to those
| attacks.
|
|
|
|
|
| "Jim Macklin" > wrote
in message
| ...
| > An MVP is NOT a business agent for or a spokesperson for
MS.
| > It is not tech support. How did you get invited to the
| > seminar where you were "given" the eval copy you have
now?
| > Get invited again and maybe they will have an SP2 eval
for
| > you, if you ask nicely.
| >
| >
| > --
| > Merry Christmas
| > Have a Safe and Happy New Year
| > Live Long and Prosper
| > Jim Macklin
| > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
| > message ...
| > |i will tommorow but what good is this newsgroup if all
your
| > answers can be
| > | found on the webpage and directly to contacting
microsoft.
| > as a mvp you
| > | should be knowlegable enough to answer the question
and
| > not pass the buck.
| > |
| > | but i didnt expect anything less
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > | "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" >
wrote
| > in message
| > | ...
| > | > What did Microsoft say when you contacted them
directly?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Jupiter Jones [MVP]
| > | > http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote
in
| > message
| > | > ...
| > | >> this statement would be true if people was helping
me
| > instead of baseless
| > | >> accusations
| > | >>
| > | >> they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the
topic
| > but the answer to
| > | >> a non releated topic they would like to answer
| > | >>
| > | >> if you do not have a valid answer then you need not
| > reply
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|

[Jim Macklin]

Everybody tries to give the best advice we can, but
everybody here (the newsgroup) is an unpaid volunteer (there
are some actual MS employees too, but not necessarily in the
know about what you want). If you are looking for a
business relationship with a company, direct contact with
the company's business offices usually works best.
Try this (from Google contact Microsoft)
http://support.microsoft.com/support/contact/default.asp
Contact Microsoft Product Support Services Contact Microsoft
Product Support Services. Send Us Feedback on This Site Help
us serve you better. ... Contact Microsoft for Technical
Support: ...
support.microsoft.com/support/contact/default.asp -
4k - Dec 13, 2004 - Cached - Similar pages
[ More results from support.microsoft.com ]



--
Merry Christmas
Have a Safe and Happy New Year
Live Long and Prosper
Jim Macklin
"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
| sorry jim for getting on your back side
|
|
| "Jim Macklin" > wrote
in message
| ...
| > Now, that makes you a jerk, gee now I'm being rude.
| >
| >
| > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
| > message ...
| > | troll is what you call people who jump in a topic and
dont
| > give valid
| > | infomation. they want to derail the topic or attack
which
| > you did very well.
| > |
| > | since i created the topic that would make you the
troll.
| > |
| > |
| > | "Tom Pepper Willett" > wrote in
message
| > | ...
| > | > You don't have a valid question, troll.
| > | >
| > | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote
in
| > message
| > | > ...
| > | > | this statement would be true if people was helping
me
| > instead of
| > | > baseless
| > | > | accusations
| > | > |
| > | > | they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the
| > topic but the answer
| > | > to
| > | > a
| > | > | non releated topic they would like to answer
| > | > |
| > | > | if you do not have a valid answer then you need
not
| > reply
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | > | "Ken Blake" >
wrote
| > in message
| > | > | ...
| > | > | > In ,
| > | > | > Juan Delacosta >
typed:
| > | > | >
| > | > | >>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
| > | > | >> the question was simple the answer cant be hard
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > | > You don't need to clarify anything. You've
already
| > clarified the only
| > | > | > thing of importance here--that you are rude to
those
| > trying to help
| > | > you.
| > | > | >
| > | > | > To repeat--that's a not a way calculated to get
you
| > the answers you
| > | > need.
| > | > | >
| > | > | > --
| > | > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
| > | > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > | >> "John Doue" > wrote in
message
| > | > | >> ...
| > | > | >>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
| > | > | >>>
| > | > | >>>> John Doue
| > | > | >>>>
| > | > | >>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know
what a
| > eval sp2 cd is
| > | > | >>>> please dont comment.
| > | > | >>>>
| > | > | >>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
| > | > | >>>>
| > | > | >>>
| > | > | >>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would
| > need an "eval sp2" cd
| > | > | >>> when you already have a legit XP CD, then may
be
| > you would get more
| > | > | >>> satisfying answers ... Or may be what you
actually
| > need to make a
| > | > | >>> "slipstream" CD with SP2.
| > | > | >>> --
| > | > | >>> John Doue
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|

[Juan Delacosta]

jim

ill try that

sorry again for my rudeness

"Jim Macklin" > wrote in message
...
> Everybody tries to give the best advice we can, but
> everybody here (the newsgroup) is an unpaid volunteer (there
> are some actual MS employees too, but not necessarily in the
> know about what you want). If you are looking for a
> business relationship with a company, direct contact with
> the company's business offices usually works best.
> Try this (from Google contact Microsoft)
> http://support.microsoft.com/support/contact/default.asp
> Contact Microsoft Product Support Services Contact Microsoft
> Product Support Services. Send Us Feedback on This Site Help
> us serve you better. ... Contact Microsoft for Technical
> Support: ...
> support.microsoft.com/support/contact/default.asp -
> 4k - Dec 13, 2004 - Cached - Similar pages
> [ More results from support.microsoft.com ]
>
>
>
> --
> Merry Christmas
> Have a Safe and Happy New Year
> Live Long and Prosper
> Jim Macklin
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> message ...
> | sorry jim for getting on your back side
> |
> |
> | "Jim Macklin" > wrote
> in message
> | ...
> | > Now, that makes you a jerk, gee now I'm being rude.
> | >
> | >
> | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
> | > message ...
> | > | troll is what you call people who jump in a topic and
> dont
> | > give valid
> | > | infomation. they want to derail the topic or attack
> which
> | > you did very well.
> | > |
> | > | since i created the topic that would make you the
> troll.
> | > |
> | > |
> | > | "Tom Pepper Willett" > wrote in
> message
> | > | ...
> | > | > You don't have a valid question, troll.
> | > | >
> | > | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote
> in
> | > message
> | > | > ...
> | > | > | this statement would be true if people was helping
> me
> | > instead of
> | > | > baseless
> | > | > | accusations
> | > | > |
> | > | > | they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to the
> | > topic but the answer
> | > | > to
> | > | > a
> | > | > | non releated topic they would like to answer
> | > | > |
> | > | > | if you do not have a valid answer then you need
> not
> | > reply
> | > | > |
> | > | > |
> | > | > | "Ken Blake" >
> wrote
> | > in message
> | > | > | ...
> | > | > | > In ,
> | > | > | > Juan Delacosta >
> typed:
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | >>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
> | > | > | >> the question was simple the answer cant be hard
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | > You don't need to clarify anything. You've
> already
> | > clarified the only
> | > | > | > thing of importance here--that you are rude to
> those
> | > trying to help
> | > | > you.
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | > To repeat--that's a not a way calculated to get
> you
> | > the answers you
> | > | > need.
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | > --
> | > | > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> | > | > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | >> "John Doue" > wrote in
> message
> | > | > | >> ...
> | > | > | >>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
> | > | > | >>>
> | > | > | >>>> John Doue
> | > | > | >>>>
> | > | > | >>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know
> what a
> | > eval sp2 cd is
> | > | > | >>>> please dont comment.
> | > | > | >>>>
> | > | > | >>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
> | > | > | >>>>
> | > | > | >>>
> | > | > | >>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you would
> | > need an "eval sp2" cd
> | > | > | >>> when you already have a legit XP CD, then may
> be
> | > you would get more
> | > | > | >>> satisfying answers ... Or may be what you
> actually
> | > need to make a
> | > | > | >>> "slipstream" CD with SP2.
> | > | > | >>> --
> | > | > | >>> John Doue
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | >
> | > | > |
> | > | > |
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > |
> | > |
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>

[Jim Macklin]

See, we can be helpful. BTW, I like rudeness, even though I
like personal computers I hate PC.

BTW2, ill is a sickness, I'll is a contraction for I will.


--
Merry Christmas
Have a Safe and Happy New Year
Live Long and Prosper
Jim Macklin
"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
message ...
| jim
|
| ill try that
|
| sorry again for my rudeness
|
| "Jim Macklin" > wrote
in message
| ...
| > Everybody tries to give the best advice we can, but
| > everybody here (the newsgroup) is an unpaid volunteer
(there
| > are some actual MS employees too, but not necessarily in
the
| > know about what you want). If you are looking for a
| > business relationship with a company, direct contact
with
| > the company's business offices usually works best.
| > Try this (from Google contact Microsoft)
| > http://support.microsoft.com/support/contact/default.asp
| > Contact Microsoft Product Support Services Contact
Microsoft
| > Product Support Services. Send Us Feedback on This Site
Help
| > us serve you better. ... Contact Microsoft for Technical
| > Support: ...
| > support.microsoft.com/support/contact/default.asp -
| > 4k - Dec 13, 2004 - Cached - Similar pages
| > [ More results from support.microsoft.com ]
| >
| >
| >
| > --
| > Merry Christmas
| > Have a Safe and Happy New Year
| > Live Long and Prosper
| > Jim Macklin
| > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in
| > message ...
| > | sorry jim for getting on your back side
| > |
| > |
| > | "Jim Macklin" >
wrote
| > in message
| > | ...
| > | > Now, that makes you a jerk, gee now I'm being rude.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > "Juan Delacosta" > wrote
in
| > | > message
...
| > | > | troll is what you call people who jump in a topic
and
| > dont
| > | > give valid
| > | > | infomation. they want to derail the topic or
attack
| > which
| > | > you did very well.
| > | > |
| > | > | since i created the topic that would make you the
| > troll.
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | > | "Tom Pepper Willett" > wrote in
| > message
| > | > | ...
| > | > | > You don't have a valid question, troll.
| > | > | >
| > | > | > "Juan Delacosta" >
wrote
| > in
| > | > message
| > | > | > ...
| > | > | > | this statement would be true if people was
helping
| > me
| > | > instead of
| > | > | > baseless
| > | > | > | accusations
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | they wasnt helping me. it was not answewrr to
the
| > | > topic but the answer
| > | > | > to
| > | > | > a
| > | > | > | non releated topic they would like to answer
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | if you do not have a valid answer then you
need
| > not
| > | > reply
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | "Ken Blake" >
| > wrote
| > | > in message
| > | > | > | ...
| > | > | > | > In
,
| > | > | > | > Juan Delacosta >
| > typed:
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | >>i do not need to clarify why i need a copy
| > | > | > | >> the question was simple the answer cant be
hard
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > You don't need to clarify anything. You've
| > already
| > | > clarified the only
| > | > | > | > thing of importance here--that you are rude
to
| > those
| > | > trying to help
| > | > | > you.
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > To repeat--that's a not a way calculated to
get
| > you
| > | > the answers you
| > | > | > need.
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > --
| > | > | > | > Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows:
Shell/User
| > | > | > | > Please reply to the newsgroup
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | >> "John Doue" > wrote in
| > message
| > | > | > | >>
...
| > | > | > | >>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
| > | > | > | >>>
| > | > | > | >>>> John Doue
| > | > | > | >>>>
| > | > | > | >>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont
know
| > what a
| > | > eval sp2 cd is
| > | > | > | >>>> please dont comment.
| > | > | > | >>>>
| > | > | > | >>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
| > | > | > | >>>>
| > | > | > | >>>
| > | > | > | >>> Ok, then may be if you clarified why you
would
| > | > need an "eval sp2" cd
| > | > | > | >>> when you already have a legit XP CD, then
may
| > be
| > | > you would get more
| > | > | > | >>> satisfying answers ... Or may be what you
| > actually
| > | > need to make a
| > | > | > | >>> "slipstream" CD with SP2.
| > | > | > | >>> --
| > | > | > | >>> John Doue
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > |
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|

[Bruce]

This is the funniest thread I've read in a LONG time!

Please post again, Juan. Soon!

[Juan Delacosta]

bruce
if only you had a clue.

go away i havent got time for babysitting!

"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
>
> This is the funniest thread I've read in a LONG time!
>
> Please post again, Juan. Soon!

[Bruce]

Thank you for another laugh, Juan.

Keep up the good work!

ha ha ha ha ha

[Bob Eyster]

Juan,

When are you going to realize that there isn't an WinXP SP2 eval CD. If
there is you can get it through Technet.

Bob Eyster



"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
> John Doue
>
> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is please
> dont comment.
>
> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>
> thanks for your time
>
>
> "John Doue" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>> wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im looking
>>> for a xp sp2 eval cd.
>>>
>>> is it that hard to understand?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yes, kind of. Why would there be an evaluation CD of SP2? Just download
>> the file (Ok, a fairly long download if you do not have a fast
>> connection) and install it. Then uninstall it if you are not satisfied.
>> --
>> John Doue
>
>

[Juan Delacosta]

when are you going to going to realize that there is an WinXP SP2 eval CD
just like there was a sp1 eval cd. and technet didnt have a link for that
one either.



can you please stick to what you know, this topic you dont have a clue
about.

if you can find any eval xp cd link share it. i know they exist just rare to
get info from redmond.


thanks for your time

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Eyster" >
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: XP sp2 Eval?


> Juan,
>
> When are you going to realize that there isn't an WinXP SP2 eval CD. If
> there is you can get it through Technet.
>
> Bob Eyster
>
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> ...
>> John Doue
>>
>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is please
>> dont comment.
>>
>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>
>> thanks for your time
>>
>>
>> "John Doue" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>>> wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im looking
>>>> for a xp sp2 eval cd.
>>>>
>>>> is it that hard to understand?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, kind of. Why would there be an evaluation CD of SP2? Just download
>>> the file (Ok, a fairly long download if you do not have a fast
>>> connection) and install it. Then uninstall it if you are not satisfied.
>>> --
>>> John Doue
>>
>>
>
>

"Bob Eyster" > wrote in message
...
> Juan,
>
> When are you going to realize that there isn't an WinXP SP2 eval CD. If
> there is you can get it through Technet.
>
> Bob Eyster
>
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> ...
>> John Doue
>>
>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is please
>> dont comment.
>>
>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>
>> thanks for your time
>>
>>
>> "John Doue" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>>> wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im looking
>>>> for a xp sp2 eval cd.
>>>>
>>>> is it that hard to understand?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, kind of. Why would there be an evaluation CD of SP2? Just download
>>> the file (Ok, a fairly long download if you do not have a fast
>>> connection) and install it. Then uninstall it if you are not satisfied.
>>> --
>>> John Doue
>>
>>
>
>

[Bill James]

Since you rebuke all attempts at reason, perhaps you should go back to =
the source that informed you there is such a download and find out =
there? Obviously you and that source know more than anyone else.

--=20

Bill James
Microsoft MVP - Shell/User

Windows VBScript Utilities =BB www.billsway.com/vbspage/
Windows Tweaks & Tips =BB www.billsway.com/notes_public/

"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message =
...
> when are you going to going to realize that there is an WinXP SP2 eval =
CD
> just like there was a sp1 eval cd. and technet didnt have a link for =
that
> one either.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> can you please stick to what you know, this topic you dont have a clue
> about.
>=20
> if you can find any eval xp cd link share it. i know they exist just =
rare to
> get info from redmond.
>=20
>=20
> thanks for your time
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "Bob Eyster" >
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
> Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 1:14 PM
> Subject: Re: XP sp2 Eval?
>=20
>=20
>> Juan,
>>
>> When are you going to realize that there isn't an WinXP SP2 eval CD. =
If=20
>> there is you can get it through Technet.
>>
>> Bob Eyster
>>
>>
>>
>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message=20
>> ...
>>> John Doue
>>>
>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is =
please=20
>>> dont comment.
>>>
>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>>
>>> thanks for your time
>>>
>>>
>>> "John Doue" > wrote in message=20
>>> ...
>>>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>>>> wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im =
looking=20
>>>>> for a xp sp2 eval cd.
>>>>>
>>>>> is it that hard to understand?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, kind of. Why would there be an evaluation CD of SP2? Just =
download=20
>>>> the file (Ok, a fairly long download if you do not have a fast=20
>>>> connection) and install it. Then uninstall it if you are not =
satisfied.
>>>> --=20
>>>> John Doue
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>=20
> "Bob Eyster" > wrote in message=20
> ...
>> Juan,
>>
>> When are you going to realize that there isn't an WinXP SP2 eval CD. =
If=20
>> there is you can get it through Technet.
>>
>> Bob Eyster
>>
>>
>>
>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message=20
>> ...
>>> John Doue
>>>
>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is =
please=20
>>> dont comment.
>>>
>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>>
>>> thanks for your time
>>>
>>>
>>> "John Doue" > wrote in message=20
>>> ...
>>>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>>>> wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im =
looking=20
>>>>> for a xp sp2 eval cd.
>>>>>
>>>>> is it that hard to understand?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, kind of. Why would there be an evaluation CD of SP2? Just =
download=20
>>>> the file (Ok, a fairly long download if you do not have a fast=20
>>>> connection) and install it. Then uninstall it if you are not =
satisfied.
>>>> --=20
>>>> John Doue
>>>
>>>
>>
>>=20
>=20
>

[Bob Eyster]

Happy Holidays,

If you know there is an SP2 val CD, then why ask here? go the source that
told you there was one and leave this NG. It appears that none of the
answers here are of your liking.

Please, leave the NG Scrooge. No one likes you, at least I don't and there's
not many I don't like but you are one of them.


Plonk!!!!




"Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
...
> when are you going to going to realize that there is an WinXP SP2 eval CD
> just like there was a sp1 eval cd. and technet didnt have a link for that
> one either.
>
>
>
> can you please stick to what you know, this topic you dont have a clue
> about.
>
> if you can find any eval xp cd link share it. i know they exist just rare
> to
> get info from redmond.
>
>
> thanks for your time
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Eyster" >
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
> Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 1:14 PM
> Subject: Re: XP sp2 Eval?
>
>
>> Juan,
>>
>> When are you going to realize that there isn't an WinXP SP2 eval CD. If
>> there is you can get it through Technet.
>>
>> Bob Eyster
>>
>>
>>
>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> John Doue
>>>
>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is please
>>> dont comment.
>>>
>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>>
>>> thanks for your time
>>>
>>>
>>> "John Doue" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>>>> wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im looking
>>>>> for a xp sp2 eval cd.
>>>>>
>>>>> is it that hard to understand?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, kind of. Why would there be an evaluation CD of SP2? Just download
>>>> the file (Ok, a fairly long download if you do not have a fast
>>>> connection) and install it. Then uninstall it if you are not satisfied.
>>>> --
>>>> John Doue
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> "Bob Eyster" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan,
>>
>> When are you going to realize that there isn't an WinXP SP2 eval CD. If
>> there is you can get it through Technet.
>>
>> Bob Eyster
>>
>>
>>
>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> John Doue
>>>
>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is please
>>> dont comment.
>>>
>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>>
>>> thanks for your time
>>>
>>>
>>> "John Doue" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>>>> wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im looking
>>>>> for a xp sp2 eval cd.
>>>>>
>>>>> is it that hard to understand?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, kind of. Why would there be an evaluation CD of SP2? Just download
>>>> the file (Ok, a fairly long download if you do not have a fast
>>>> connection) and install it. Then uninstall it if you are not satisfied.
>>>> --
>>>> John Doue
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

[Juan Delacosta]

Bob

your not as dense as you sound here. the topic was dead before you trolled.
im not here for you to like bob that is not a requirement to post here bob.

the topic bob in another microsoft newsgroup was answered by professionals
while this topic started here bob has done nothing but attract trolls like
you.

Merry Christmas, even to a grench like you bob




----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Eyster" >
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: XP sp2 Eval?


> Happy Holidays,
>
> If you know there is an SP2 val CD, then why ask here? go the source that
> told you there was one and leave this NG. It appears that none of the
> answers here are of your liking.
>
> Please, leave the NG Scrooge. No one likes you, at least I don't and
> there's not many I don't like but you are one of them.
>
>
> Plonk!!!!
>
>
>
>
> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
> ...
>> when are you going to going to realize that there is an WinXP SP2 eval CD
>> just like there was a sp1 eval cd. and technet didnt have a link for that
>> one either.
>>
>>
>>
>> can you please stick to what you know, this topic you dont have a clue
>> about.
>>
>> if you can find any eval xp cd link share it. i know they exist just rare
>> to
>> get info from redmond.
>>
>>
>> thanks for your time
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bob Eyster" >
>> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
>> Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 1:14 PM
>> Subject: Re: XP sp2 Eval?
>>
>>
>>> Juan,
>>>
>>> When are you going to realize that there isn't an WinXP SP2 eval CD. If
>>> there is you can get it through Technet.
>>>
>>> Bob Eyster
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> John Doue
>>>>
>>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is please
>>>> dont comment.
>>>>
>>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>>>
>>>> thanks for your time
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "John Doue" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>>>>> wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im
>>>>>> looking for a xp sp2 eval cd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is it that hard to understand?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, kind of. Why would there be an evaluation CD of SP2? Just
>>>>> download the file (Ok, a fairly long download if you do not have a
>>>>> fast connection) and install it. Then uninstall it if you are not
>>>>> satisfied.
>>>>> --
>>>>> John Doue
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> "Bob Eyster" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan,
>>>
>>> When are you going to realize that there isn't an WinXP SP2 eval CD. If
>>> there is you can get it through Technet.
>>>
>>> Bob Eyster
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Juan Delacosta" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> John Doue
>>>>
>>>> thanks for your reply but if you dont know what a eval sp2 cd is please
>>>> dont comment.
>>>>
>>>> this is not sp2 upgrade cd.
>>>>
>>>> thanks for your time
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "John Doue" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Juan Delacosta wrote:
>>>>>> wow you can you read the thread , i have a legit version xp im
>>>>>> looking for a xp sp2 eval cd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is it that hard to understand?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, kind of. Why would there be an evaluation CD of SP2? Just
>>>>> download the file (Ok, a fairly long download if you do not have a
>>>>> fast connection) and install it. Then uninstall it if you are not
>>>>> satisfied.
>>>>> --
>>>>> John Doue
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>