Jake
April 24th 05, 06:17 AM
"Peter D" wrote:
> After SP2 upgrade, MSC (McAfee Security Centre) popped up and advised that
> WSC (Windows Security Centre) be disabled so as not to conflict with MSC.
> Makes sense to run only one of them. All the info from McAfee makes it clear
> that (in their opinion) MSC is better than WSC. Is it? I mean, they're
> biased in favour of their own product. I would suppose that MS would say the
> opposite.
>
> MSC only runs McAfee AV and I have no interest in purchasing the other
> software they keep advising me to get (Firewall, Antispam, Privacy), not
> when these things are available for free/lower cost. WSC includes AV and
> Personal Firewall. Is the MS AV or PF any good?
>
> At the moment I've left things as they were -- McAfee for Anti-Virus,
> Windows for Firewall and Automatic Updates -- but I'd like to settle on one
> only and be done with it. Any opinions?
> Thanks.
>
>
> Go to norton its better
> After SP2 upgrade, MSC (McAfee Security Centre) popped up and advised that
> WSC (Windows Security Centre) be disabled so as not to conflict with MSC.
> Makes sense to run only one of them. All the info from McAfee makes it clear
> that (in their opinion) MSC is better than WSC. Is it? I mean, they're
> biased in favour of their own product. I would suppose that MS would say the
> opposite.
>
> MSC only runs McAfee AV and I have no interest in purchasing the other
> software they keep advising me to get (Firewall, Antispam, Privacy), not
> when these things are available for free/lower cost. WSC includes AV and
> Personal Firewall. Is the MS AV or PF any good?
>
> At the moment I've left things as they were -- McAfee for Anti-Virus,
> Windows for Firewall and Automatic Updates -- but I'd like to settle on one
> only and be done with it. Any opinions?
> Thanks.
>
>
> Go to norton its better