microsoft virtual machine for XP Pro

[Scott]

hi folks... where is the file that i can download for VM
for XP Pro.... there are some java scripts that my
browser will not display... and VM is not even mentioned
in the advanced tab.. under tools in explorer 6.. i've
updated xp all the way.. and explorer also... the pages
that i'm trying to view on xp/ie6.. leave out the
java ... but win 2k.. and 98 run fine...als in the latter
VM is noted in the tool/advanced tab... thanks much

[Nicholas]

Download & install MS Virtual Machine Build 3805.
Then visit the Windows Update website to obtain the
security updated version (Build 3810).
http://www.virtualmachine.tk/


--=20
Nicholas

--------------------------------------------------------------------

"Scott" > wrote in message:
...

| hi folks... where is the file that i can download for VM=20
| for XP Pro.... there are some java scripts that my=20
| browser will not display... and VM is not even mentioned=20
| in the advanced tab.. under tools in explorer 6.. i've=20
| updated xp all the way.. and explorer also... the pages=20
| that i'm trying to view on xp/ie6.. leave out the=20
| java ... but win 2k.. and 98 run fine...als in the latter=20
| VM is noted in the tool/advanced tab... thanks much

[Harry Ohrn]

http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail.php3?fid=1050022631

--

Harry Ohrn - MS MVP [Shell/User]
www.webtree.ca/windowsxp


"Scott" > wrote in message
...
> hi folks... where is the file that i can download for VM
> for XP Pro.... there are some java scripts that my
> browser will not display... and VM is not even mentioned
> in the advanced tab.. under tools in explorer 6.. i've
> updated xp all the way.. and explorer also... the pages
> that i'm trying to view on xp/ie6.. leave out the
> java ... but win 2k.. and 98 run fine...als in the latter
> VM is noted in the tool/advanced tab... thanks much

[sqr]

download SP1 to get M$ VMJ

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
ftp://sqr.myftp.biz


"Scott" > wrote in message
...
> hi folks... where is the file that i can download for VM
> for XP Pro.... there are some java scripts that my
> browser will not display... and VM is not even mentioned
> in the advanced tab.. under tools in explorer 6.. i've
> updated xp all the way.. and explorer also... the pages
> that i'm trying to view on xp/ie6.. leave out the
> java ... but win 2k.. and 98 run fine...als in the latter
> VM is noted in the tool/advanced tab... thanks much

[Nicholas]

SP1 no longer contains the Microsoft Virtual Machine!

--=20
Nicholas

----------------------------------------------

"sqr" > wrote in message:
...

| download SP1 to get M$ VMJ
|=20
| --=20
| sqr
| Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
| --

[Ted]

"Nicholas" > wrote in message =
...
SP1 no longer contains the Microsoft Virtual Machine!


Yes it does, the SP1a doesn't have it, you twit!

[sqr]

I wonder who would pick up on that.

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
ftp://sqr.myftp.biz


"Ted" <"""""""> wrote in message
s.com...

"Nicholas" > wrote in message
...
SP1 no longer contains the Microsoft Virtual Machine!


Yes it does, the SP1a doesn't have it, you twit!

[Nicholas]

SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now the =
only
Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot download
SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the same
as referring to SP1a.

--=20
Nicholas

[sqr]

>SP1 and SP1a

Nicholas look at them do they look the same to you?

If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will download and if they want
SP1a then that is what they will download.

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
ftp://sqr.myftp.biz


"Nicholas" > wrote in message
...
SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now the only
Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot download
SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the same
as referring to SP1a.

--
Nicholas

[Nicholas]

SP1 is SP1a. I can assure you when you download SP1
from Microsoft, you are getting SP1a "sans" MS VM.

--=20
Nicholas

-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----------------

"sqr" > wrote in message:
...

| >SP1 and SP1a
|=20
| Nicholas look at them do they look the same to you?
|=20
| If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will download and if they =
want
| SP1a then that is what they will download.
|=20
| --=20
| sqr
| Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
| --
| ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
|=20
|=20
| "Nicholas" > wrote in message
| ...
| SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now the =
only
| Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot download
| SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the =
same
| as referring to SP1a.
|=20
| --=20
| Nicholas
|=20
|=20
|

[Ted]

"Nicholas" > wrote in message =
...

"SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now the =
only
Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot download
SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the same
as referring to SP1a."

So, referring to Nicholas, as a pillocking ****wit, would be the same as =
referring SP1, as SP1a?

[sqr]

Who said anything about M$ we are talking about SP1 and SP1a aren't we.

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
ftp://sqr.myftp.biz


"Nicholas" > wrote in message
...
SP1 is SP1a. I can assure you when you download SP1
from Microsoft, you are getting SP1a "sans" MS VM.

--
Nicholas

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------

"sqr" > wrote in message:
...

| >SP1 and SP1a
|
| Nicholas look at them do they look the same to you?
|
| If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will download and if they
want
| SP1a then that is what they will download.
|
| --
| sqr
| Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
| --
| ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
|
|
| "Nicholas" > wrote in message
| ...
| SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now the
only
| Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot download
| SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the same
| as referring to SP1a.
|
| --
| Nicholas
|
|
|

[Nicholas]

Just for your edification, please refrain from using "M$" when
referring to Microsoft. Your slang expression is in very poor=20
taste in a Microsoft-sponsored newsgroup. =20

--=20
Nicholas

[tsyhtema]

Well I guess that M$ has done well. They save billions in revenue by
providing a news group for peer to peer H&S so they don't have to employ
anyone to do it. Keep lining Bill's pockets and buy the new Longhorn version
when it comes out. Hmmmmm, Longhorn, well if it lives up to its name it will
be full of Bull crap.

"Nicholas" > wrote in message
...
Just for your edification, please refrain from using "M$" when
referring to Microsoft. Your slang expression is in very poor
taste in a Microsoft-sponsored newsgroup.

--
Nicholas

[Unknown]

Why do you keep playing games with symantics?
"sqr" > wrote in message
...
> Me:
> >download SP1 to get M$ VMJ
>
> Him:
> >SP1 no longer contains the Microsoft Virtual Machine!
>
> SP1 still has VJM in it but SP1a does not.
>
> Somebody:
> >Yes it does, the SP1a doesn't have it, you twit!
>
> Him:
> >SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same
>
> TO who???
>
> Me:
> >If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will >download and if they
> want
> >SP1a then that is what they will download.
>
> Him:
> >SP1 is SP1a. I can assure you when you download >SP1
> >from Microsoft, you are getting SP1a "sans" MS VM.
>
> Me:
> >Who said anything about M$ we are talking about SP1 and SP1a aren't we.
>
>
> You furry eared Bint who ever said anything about downloading it from M$
all
> I said was you can still download it.
>
> --
> sqr
> Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> --
> ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
>
>
> "SunSpot" > wrote in message
> ...
> > sqr, this is from Microsofts site:
> >
> > "Windows XP Service Pack 1
> > Release Date: September 9, 2002
> >
> > How to Obtain
> > Service Pack 1 (SP1) is no longer available for download."
> >
> > That as has been explained to you before, SP1 is no longer available
> > from Microsoft (you may be able to find it from another source).
> > If you go to windows update or the SP download area, all you can
download
> is
> > SP1a
> > which does NOT contain the vm.
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q322389
> >
> >
> > "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > SP1 no longer contains the Microsoft Virtual Machine!
> >
> > --
> > Nicholas
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------
> >
> > "sqr" > wrote in message:
> > ...
> >
> > | download SP1 to get M$ VMJ
> > |
> > | --
> > | sqr
> > | Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > | --
> >
> >
>
>

[sqr]

Me:
>download SP1 to get M$ VMJ

Him:
>SP1 no longer contains the Microsoft Virtual Machine!

SP1 still has VJM in it but SP1a does not.

Somebody:
>Yes it does, the SP1a doesn't have it, you twit!

Him:
>SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same

TO who???

Me:
>If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will >download and if they
want
>SP1a then that is what they will download.

Him:
>SP1 is SP1a. I can assure you when you download >SP1
>from Microsoft, you are getting SP1a "sans" MS VM.

Me:
>Who said anything about M$ we are talking about SP1 and SP1a aren't we.


You furry eared Bint who ever said anything about downloading it from M$ all
I said was you can still download it.

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
ftp://sqr.myftp.biz


"SunSpot" > wrote in message
...
> sqr, this is from Microsofts site:
>
> "Windows XP Service Pack 1
> Release Date: September 9, 2002
>
> How to Obtain
> Service Pack 1 (SP1) is no longer available for download."
>
> That as has been explained to you before, SP1 is no longer available
> from Microsoft (you may be able to find it from another source).
> If you go to windows update or the SP download area, all you can download
is
> SP1a
> which does NOT contain the vm.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q322389
>
>
> "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> ...
> SP1 no longer contains the Microsoft Virtual Machine!
>
> --
> Nicholas
>
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> "sqr" > wrote in message:
> ...
>
> | download SP1 to get M$ VMJ
> |
> | --
> | sqr
> | Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> | --
>
>

[SunSpot]

Nicholas, your wasting your time arguing this with sqr.
It has been explained to him before but he simply cannot put 2 and 2
together.


"Nicholas" > wrote in message
...
SP1 is SP1a. I can assure you when you download SP1
from Microsoft, you are getting SP1a "sans" MS VM.

--
Nicholas

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------

"sqr" > wrote in message:
...

| >SP1 and SP1a
|
| Nicholas look at them do they look the same to you?
|
| If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will download and if they
want
| SP1a then that is what they will download.
|
| --
| sqr
| Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
| --
| ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
|
|
| "Nicholas" > wrote in message
| ...
| SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now the
only
| Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot download
| SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the same
| as referring to SP1a.
|
| --
| Nicholas
|
|
|

[Paul]

lol. BTW, nice comment about Longhorn. If it's not amazing, it'll be bull
crap.
"sqr" > wrote in message
...
> No *you* dumb pillock if you want SP1 *NOT* Sp1a then download IT FROM MY
> SITE so do not say that it is not available.
>
> GOT IT!!!
>
> --
> sqr
> Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> --
> ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
>
>
> "SunSpot" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Nicholas, your wasting your time arguing this with sqr.
> > It has been explained to him before but he simply cannot put 2 and 2
> > together.
> >
> >
> > "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > SP1 is SP1a. I can assure you when you download SP1
> > from Microsoft, you are getting SP1a "sans" MS VM.
> >
> > --
> > Nicholas
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > --------------
> >
> > "sqr" > wrote in message:
> > ...
> >
> > | >SP1 and SP1a
> > |
> > | Nicholas look at them do they look the same to you?
> > |
> > | If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will download and if they
> > want
> > | SP1a then that is what they will download.
> > |
> > | --
> > | sqr
> > | Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > | --
> > | ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
> > |
> > |
> > | "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > | ...
> > | SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now the
> > only
> > | Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot download
> > | SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the
same
> > | as referring to SP1a.
> > |
> > | --
> > | Nicholas
> > |
> > |
> > |
> >
> >
>
>

[SunSpot]

> "sqr" > wrote in message
> ...
> > No *you* dumb pillock if you want SP1 *NOT* Sp1a then download IT FROM
MY
> > SITE so do not say that it is not available.
> >
> > GOT IT!!!

If it's available form your site, then why don't you just come out
and tell that to the posters looking for it in the first place?
Do you expect them to try to read your mind?

And if you read my other post, (and the posts of others who have told you
the same thing over and over and over again).
It has been said that it may be available someplace other then Microsoft,
but if the posters are going to Windows Update, it's not going to re-direct
them to your site now is it?
How many people who post here looking for the JVM are going to know that
they can get it in SP1, IF
they download it from you. IF you tell someone to get SP1, they are going to
go to Microsoft unless you
tell them something different. If they go to Microsoft, they are not going
to get SP1 but SP1a.
So the average person following your "it's in SP1" instructions is not going
to get the JVM now are they?
Don't get all bent out of shape because your unable to make a proper post.

<PLONK>


> >
> > --
> > sqr
> > Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > --
> > ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
> >
> >
> > "SunSpot" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > Nicholas, your wasting your time arguing this with sqr.
> > > It has been explained to him before but he simply cannot put 2 and 2
> > > together.
> > >
> > >
> > > "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > SP1 is SP1a. I can assure you when you download SP1
> > > from Microsoft, you are getting SP1a "sans" MS VM.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nicholas
> > >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > > --------------
> > >
> > > "sqr" > wrote in message:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > | >SP1 and SP1a
> > > |
> > > | Nicholas look at them do they look the same to you?
> > > |
> > > | If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will download and if
they
> > > want
> > > | SP1a then that is what they will download.
> > > |
> > > | --
> > > | sqr
> > > | Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > > | --
> > > | ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
> > > |
> > > |
> > > | "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > > | ...
> > > | SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now
the
> > > only
> > > | Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot
download
> > > | SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the
> same
> > > | as referring to SP1a.
> > > |
> > > | --
> > > | Nicholas
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

[Bob]

*your* still a dumb pillock.

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
ftp://sqr.myftp.biz


"SunSpot" > wrote in message
...
>
> > "sqr" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > No *you* dumb pillock if you want SP1 *NOT* Sp1a then download IT FROM
> MY
> > > SITE so do not say that it is not available.
> > >
> > > GOT IT!!!
>
> If it's available form your site, then why don't you just come out
> and tell that to the posters looking for it in the first place?
> Do you expect them to try to read your mind?
>
> And if you read my other post, (and the posts of others who have told you
> the same thing over and over and over again).
> It has been said that it may be available someplace other then Microsoft,
> but if the posters are going to Windows Update, it's not going to
re-direct
> them to your site now is it?
> How many people who post here looking for the JVM are going to know that
> they can get it in SP1, IF
> they download it from you. IF you tell someone to get SP1, they are going
to
> go to Microsoft unless you
> tell them something different. If they go to Microsoft, they are not going
> to get SP1 but SP1a.
> So the average person following your "it's in SP1" instructions is not
going
> to get the JVM now are they?
> Don't get all bent out of shape because your unable to make a proper post.
>
> <PLONK>
>
>
> > >
> > > --
> > > sqr
> > > Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > > --
> > > ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
> > >
> > >
> > > "SunSpot" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > > Nicholas, your wasting your time arguing this with sqr.
> > > > It has been explained to him before but he simply cannot put 2 and 2
> > > > together.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > > > ...
> > > > SP1 is SP1a. I can assure you when you download SP1
> > > > from Microsoft, you are getting SP1a "sans" MS VM.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Nicholas
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > > --------------
> > > >
> > > > "sqr" > wrote in message:
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > | >SP1 and SP1a
> > > > |
> > > > | Nicholas look at them do they look the same to you?
> > > > |
> > > > | If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will download and if
> they
> > > > want
> > > > | SP1a then that is what they will download.
> > > > |
> > > > | --
> > > > | sqr
> > > > | Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > > > | --
> > > > | ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > | "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > > > | ...
> > > > | SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now
> the
> > > > only
> > > > | Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot
> download
> > > > | SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the
> > same
> > > > | as referring to SP1a.
> > > > |
> > > > | --
> > > > | Nicholas
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

[Carol]

*your* still a dumb pillock

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
ftp://sqr.myftp.biz


"SunSpot" > wrote in message
...
>
> > "sqr" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > No *you* dumb pillock if you want SP1 *NOT* Sp1a then download IT FROM
> MY
> > > SITE so do not say that it is not available.
> > >
> > > GOT IT!!!
>
> If it's available form your site, then why don't you just come out
> and tell that to the posters looking for it in the first place?
> Do you expect them to try to read your mind?
>
> And if you read my other post, (and the posts of others who have told you
> the same thing over and over and over again).
> It has been said that it may be available someplace other then Microsoft,
> but if the posters are going to Windows Update, it's not going to
re-direct
> them to your site now is it?
> How many people who post here looking for the JVM are going to know that
> they can get it in SP1, IF
> they download it from you. IF you tell someone to get SP1, they are going
to
> go to Microsoft unless you
> tell them something different. If they go to Microsoft, they are not going
> to get SP1 but SP1a.
> So the average person following your "it's in SP1" instructions is not
going
> to get the JVM now are they?
> Don't get all bent out of shape because your unable to make a proper post.
>
> <PLONK>
>
>
> > >
> > > --
> > > sqr
> > > Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > > --
> > > ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
> > >
> > >
> > > "SunSpot" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > > Nicholas, your wasting your time arguing this with sqr.
> > > > It has been explained to him before but he simply cannot put 2 and 2
> > > > together.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > > > ...
> > > > SP1 is SP1a. I can assure you when you download SP1
> > > > from Microsoft, you are getting SP1a "sans" MS VM.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Nicholas
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > > --------------
> > > >
> > > > "sqr" > wrote in message:
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > | >SP1 and SP1a
> > > > |
> > > > | Nicholas look at them do they look the same to you?
> > > > |
> > > > | If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will download and if
> they
> > > > want
> > > > | SP1a then that is what they will download.
> > > > |
> > > > | --
> > > > | sqr
> > > > | Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > > > | --
> > > > | ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > | "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > > > | ...
> > > > | SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now
> the
> > > > only
> > > > | Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot
> download
> > > > | SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the
> > same
> > > > | as referring to SP1a.
> > > > |
> > > > | --
> > > > | Nicholas
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

[Alice]

*your* still a dumb pillock

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
ftp://sqr.myftp.biz


"SunSpot" > wrote in message
...
>
> > "sqr" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > No *you* dumb pillock if you want SP1 *NOT* Sp1a then download IT FROM
> MY
> > > SITE so do not say that it is not available.
> > >
> > > GOT IT!!!
>
> If it's available form your site, then why don't you just come out
> and tell that to the posters looking for it in the first place?
> Do you expect them to try to read your mind?
>
> And if you read my other post, (and the posts of others who have told you
> the same thing over and over and over again).
> It has been said that it may be available someplace other then Microsoft,
> but if the posters are going to Windows Update, it's not going to
re-direct
> them to your site now is it?
> How many people who post here looking for the JVM are going to know that
> they can get it in SP1, IF
> they download it from you. IF you tell someone to get SP1, they are going
to
> go to Microsoft unless you
> tell them something different. If they go to Microsoft, they are not going
> to get SP1 but SP1a.
> So the average person following your "it's in SP1" instructions is not
going
> to get the JVM now are they?
> Don't get all bent out of shape because your unable to make a proper post.
>
> <PLONK>
>
>
> > >
> > > --
> > > sqr
> > > Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > > --
> > > ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
> > >
> > >
> > > "SunSpot" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > > Nicholas, your wasting your time arguing this with sqr.
> > > > It has been explained to him before but he simply cannot put 2 and 2
> > > > together.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > > > ...
> > > > SP1 is SP1a. I can assure you when you download SP1
> > > > from Microsoft, you are getting SP1a "sans" MS VM.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Nicholas
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > > --------------
> > > >
> > > > "sqr" > wrote in message:
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > | >SP1 and SP1a
> > > > |
> > > > | Nicholas look at them do they look the same to you?
> > > > |
> > > > | If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will download and if
> they
> > > > want
> > > > | SP1a then that is what they will download.
> > > > |
> > > > | --
> > > > | sqr
> > > > | Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > > > | --
> > > > | ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > | "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > > > | ...
> > > > | SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now
> the
> > > > only
> > > > | Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot
> download
> > > > | SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the
> > same
> > > > | as referring to SP1a.
> > > > |
> > > > | --
> > > > | Nicholas
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

[Ted2]

*your* still a dumb pillock

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
ftp://sqr.myftp.biz


"SunSpot" > wrote in message
...
>
> > "sqr" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > No *you* dumb pillock if you want SP1 *NOT* Sp1a then download IT FROM
> MY
> > > SITE so do not say that it is not available.
> > >
> > > GOT IT!!!
>
> If it's available form your site, then why don't you just come out
> and tell that to the posters looking for it in the first place?
> Do you expect them to try to read your mind?
>
> And if you read my other post, (and the posts of others who have told you
> the same thing over and over and over again).
> It has been said that it may be available someplace other then Microsoft,
> but if the posters are going to Windows Update, it's not going to
re-direct
> them to your site now is it?
> How many people who post here looking for the JVM are going to know that
> they can get it in SP1, IF
> they download it from you. IF you tell someone to get SP1, they are going
to
> go to Microsoft unless you
> tell them something different. If they go to Microsoft, they are not going
> to get SP1 but SP1a.
> So the average person following your "it's in SP1" instructions is not
going
> to get the JVM now are they?
> Don't get all bent out of shape because your unable to make a proper post.
>
> <PLONK>
>
>
> > >
> > > --
> > > sqr
> > > Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > > --
> > > ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
> > >
> > >
> > > "SunSpot" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > > Nicholas, your wasting your time arguing this with sqr.
> > > > It has been explained to him before but he simply cannot put 2 and 2
> > > > together.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > > > ...
> > > > SP1 is SP1a. I can assure you when you download SP1
> > > > from Microsoft, you are getting SP1a "sans" MS VM.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Nicholas
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > > --------------
> > > >
> > > > "sqr" > wrote in message:
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > | >SP1 and SP1a
> > > > |
> > > > | Nicholas look at them do they look the same to you?
> > > > |
> > > > | If somebody wants SP1 then that is what they will download and if
> they
> > > > want
> > > > | SP1a then that is what they will download.
> > > > |
> > > > | --
> > > > | sqr
> > > > | Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
> > > > | --
> > > > | ftp://sqr.myftp.biz
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > | "Nicholas" > wrote in message
> > > > | ...
> > > > | SP1 and SP1a are considered one in the same since only SP1a is now
> the
> > > > only
> > > > | Windows XP Service Pack available from Microsoft. One cannot
> download
> > > > | SP1 from Microsoft, only SP1a. Hence, referring to SP1 is now the
> > same
> > > > | as referring to SP1a.
> > > > |
> > > > | --
> > > > | Nicholas
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>