PDA

View Full Version : RAM Recovery Programs - Good or Bad?


Cooter
December 5th 03, 01:57 AM
What is the consensus on programs such as RAM Turbo, Free RAM and the like
for Win XP? I have read totally conflicting reports on their usefulness. Is
it better to run with or without them, and does running with one of them do
any harm such as creating a drag on the OS?

null
December 5th 03, 01:58 AM
Cooter wrote:
> What is the consensus on programs such as RAM Turbo, Free RAM and the like
> for Win XP? I have read totally conflicting reports on their usefulness. Is
> it better to run with or without them, and does running with one of them do
> any harm such as creating a drag on the OS?
>
>

PC Magazine has reported these things as a waste of money.

--
-the small one

All postings carry no guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied.
Proceed at your own risk, and perform system and data backups prior to
making changes to your system, and on a regular basis, to protect your
system.

Walter Clayton
December 5th 03, 01:58 AM
They're all absolutely useless. In fact, none can do what they claim. All
they can do is force the system into premature page aging which is
definitely counter productive. See
http://www.radsoft.net/resources/software/reviews/redux/ for a description
of why you don't want any of things on your machine.

--
Walter Clayton - MS MVP(WinXP)
Associate Expert
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
http://www.dts-l.org
http://support.microsoft.com/servicedesks/fileversion/default.asp


"Cooter" > wrote in message
. com...
> What is the consensus on programs such as RAM Turbo, Free RAM and the like
> for Win XP? I have read totally conflicting reports on their usefulness.
Is
> it better to run with or without them, and does running with one of them
do
> any harm such as creating a drag on the OS?
>
>

Ken Blake
December 5th 03, 01:58 AM
In , Cooter
wrote:

> What is the consensus on programs such as RAM Turbo, Free RAM
and the
> like for Win XP? I have read totally conflicting reports on
their
> usefulness. Is it better to run with or without them, and does
> running with one of them do any harm such as creating a drag on
the
> OS?


It's far better to run without them. All such programs are
counterproductive.

--
Ken Blake
Please reply to the newsgroup

Bruce Chambers
December 5th 03, 06:53 AM
Greetings --

Snake Oil.

Bruce Chambers

--
Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on
having both at once. -- RAH


"Cooter" > wrote in message
. com...
> What is the consensus on programs such as RAM Turbo, Free RAM and
the like
> for Win XP? I have read totally conflicting reports on their
usefulness. Is
> it better to run with or without them, and does running with one of
them do
> any harm such as creating a drag on the OS?
>
>

Donald Link
December 5th 03, 06:54 AM
Was it PT Barnum that said there is a sucker born every minute when they ask
him how he could continual run his scams.





"Bruce Chambers" > wrote in message
...
> Greetings --
>
> Snake Oil.
>
> Bruce Chambers
>
> --
> Help us help you:
> http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
> You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on
> having both at once. -- RAH
>
>
> "Cooter" > wrote in message
> . com...
> > What is the consensus on programs such as RAM Turbo, Free RAM and
> the like
> > for Win XP? I have read totally conflicting reports on their
> usefulness. Is
> > it better to run with or without them, and does running with one of
> them do
> > any harm such as creating a drag on the OS?
> >
> >
>
>

Google