This could be it....

[Blob]

i say that i have the 32 bit one because in display
properties under the Settings tab for the Color Quality
the highest I have is 32 bit. But rember I'm just pulling
this outta my ass here. I also would like to know. :D




----------------------------------------------------------
by the way my email is not my real email so dont e-mail
me.

[D.Currie]

"Blob" > wrote in message
...
> i say that i have the 32 bit one because in display
> properties under the Settings tab for the Color Quality
> the highest I have is 32 bit. But rember I'm just pulling
> this outta my ass here. I also would like to know. :D
>
Color depth has nothing to do with the 32- or 64-bit versions of XP. It's
pretty much guaranteed you have the 32-bit version; if you spent what you'd
need for the hardware for the 64-bit version as well as the 64-bit version
of XP, you'd know it.

[Ken Blake]

In , Blob wrote:

> i say that i have the 32 bit one because in display
> properties under the Settings tab for the Color Quality
> the highest I have is 32 bit.


No, you're mixing up two unrelated things. You're looking at
color depth, which has nothing to do with how many bits the
processor handles at once (which is what the question is about)


> But rember I'm just pulling
> this outta my ass here. I also would like to know. :D


But you almost certainly do have a 32-bit edition. Nobody has
64-bit hardware and software without knowing it.


--
Ken Blake
Please reply to the newsgroup