My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
LOL Gotcha now.
Those are sales title "certifications" used by members of the partners program. Definitely not employee titles. -- Larry Samuels Associate Expert MS-MVP (2001-2005) Unofficial FAQ for Windows Server 2003 at http://pelos.us/SERVER.htm Expert Zone- www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in message ... Larry Samuels wrote: Hi Rhonda, MVPs are absolutely *NOT* Microsoft employees. In fact, there is a clause in the agreement that if a MVP is hired by MS that they have to give up their MVP status. I wasn't talking about an MVP. I haven't seen *any* MVP write anything I would consider actionable. I was talking about CRaven, who holds him/herself out to be a "Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist, Microsoft Licensing Sales Specialist, and Microsoft Small Business Specialist." It may be, however, that I have misinterpreted these titles, and that s/he does not work for Microsoft, but has simply been endowed with special magical powers. In which case, if I were Microsoft, I'd take them back soonest. You can get more info on who MVPs are and what the program is about at http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Read it already. I've been really, really busy these last few weeks with all the reading I've been doing (I'm currently unemployed, so I have time), and my eyes hurt. :) I think you guys (to include both men and women MVPs) are terrific to give your time and that you do a wonderful job. I've learned a lot here. I just didn't like CRaven's attitude--it was a little too haughty for my taste, so I expressed myself in a tone to match. :) rl -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Insisting on perfect safety is for people without the balls to live in the real world. Mary Shafer Iliff |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
Larry Samuels wrote:
LOL Gotcha now. Those are sales title "certifications" used by members of the partners program. Definitely not employee titles. Thanks, Larry, for the clarification. :) It kinda reminds of the corporate practice of the 80s when everyone gave business cards (to low level employees) in lieu of a pay raise. Sheesh! rl -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Calvin: "Do you think our morality is defined by our actions or by what's in our hearts?" Hobbes: "I think our actions *show* what is in our hearts." Calvin: "I RESENT THAT!" |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: If I were the original poster, I would just write to (not call) Microsoft, and ask for a determination, because this thread is totally out of control. Amen to that. But sometimes late in the evening or the wee early hours of the morning, one of the best shows in town is the Carey vs. Kurt, Alias, and gang show. |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
"KDagnell" wrote in message
... Hi there, My motherboard has died and I need to transfer reinstall Windows off my oem disk - a friend tells me that this would breach lisencing and I need a new version! Is this true and is there anything else that I should know regarding this? Don't see any persons here qualified to provide legal advice, just their opinions. You seem to be implying that you're replacing the motherboard. If this is incorrect, ignore further. My experience shows with XP generic OEM, when swapping motherboards, MS doesn't give hoot. Even when you call them for a product ID explaining the situation truthfully. A recovery CD provides incorrect drivers for different motherboard, and its internals. As does a specific XP OEM install CD. If the same or highly similar motherboard, no sweat. The legality question, am not qualified to answer that without any background in that area. -- Jonny |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
If I were the original poster, I would just write to (not call) Microsoft, and ask for a determination, because this thread is totally out of control. Then should IBM have written SCO for their interpretation of the UNIX license? I think not. It is quite simple. Read the EULA and the SBL and make a determination for yourself. The EULA never says a freakin' word about the motherboard, and the SBL only mentions the motherboard once. "A "fully assembled computer system" means a computer system consisting of at least a central processing unit, a motherboard, a hard drive, a power supply, and a case." The motherboard is only one of 5 components that make up a "fully assembled computer system." The SBL does NOT specify that one of these five components is greater than the others. So what is agreed to is very simple. Carey's nonsense is not included in any license that has been agreed to. It's so simple that only idiots and people with their heads up their own butt cannot see it. http://carey.microscum.com -- Peace! Kurt Kirsch Self-anointed Moderator http://microscum.com "It'll soon shake your Windows And rattle your walls For the times they are a-changin'." |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
Jonny wrote:
"KDagnell" wrote in message ... Hi there, My motherboard has died and I need to transfer reinstall Windows off my oem disk - a friend tells me that this would breach lisencing and I need a new version! Is this true and is there anything else that I should know regarding this? Don't see any persons here qualified to provide legal advice, just their opinions. You seem to be implying that you're replacing the motherboard. If this is incorrect, ignore further. My experience shows with XP generic OEM, when swapping motherboards, MS doesn't give hoot. Even when you call them for a product ID explaining the situation truthfully. A recovery CD provides incorrect drivers for different motherboard, and its internals. As does a specific XP OEM install CD. If the same or highly similar motherboard, no sweat. The legality question, am not qualified to answer that without any background in that area. Can you read? If so, then you should see for yourself that this motherboard cannot be changed nonsense is not part of any license that was agreed to. I doesn't take a law degree to see that. This is not a legal opinion, just friggin' common sense. -- Peace! Kurt Kirsch Self-anointed Moderator http://microscum.com "It'll soon shake your Windows And rattle your walls For the times they are a-changin'." |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
kurttrail wrote:
Larry Samuels wrote: Hi Rhonda, Those of us that do have access to that site CANNOT post what is there due to NDA restrictions. snip The NDA restrictions haven't stopped Carey. My understanding is if it can be googled it isn't restricted by the NDA. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...oogle+S earch It's the second hit and you don't need a password to access it. Also note there is no mention of the motherboard in the publicly accessible document. I don't know of any publicly accessible documents that say the motherboard defines the computer. In any case even if it is on a web site I don't see how that would have anything to do with amending the end user's license. It is conceivable that an end user may not have Internet access and even if they do why would they search for an amended license agreement. Until Microsoft puts this (motherboard defines the computer) in a EULA that the end user agrees to I don't see how it can be legally enforced. In practice they can try to enforce it though activations but it would be interesting to see it challenged in court. I often change motherboards for customers. So far I have never been refused activation. -- Kerry MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
kurttrail wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: If I were the original poster, I would just write to (not call) Microsoft, and ask for a determination, because this thread is totally out of control. snip It is quite simple. Read the EULA and the SBL and make a determination for yourself. I agree. But I'm not the original poster, who *didn't* read the EULA (probably can't since her computer is down) and who is now getting a very long thread full of "expert" answers, not all of which agree. Look, I didn't realize that CRaven person is not an employee of Microsoft--s/he certainly went out of his/her way to look "official" with all the titles below his/her name--so why would any other casual user have that knowledge? If I were the person asking that question...well, I read what you and Alias write pretty closely, Kurt, and for that reason, I trust your answers, but for someone who pops in to solve a single problem...it's a problem. Who are you (the generic you, not the "Kurt you", because you're a skeptic if ever there was one)going to heed? The poster with the string of titles or the poster who either has no sig or a sig with a a parody website and an apparent axe to grind? Apart from the philosophical and interpretative line of the thread, there is still a real live human being with a problem, and she came here to get it solved. She has touched off a food fight, but she still doesn't have a definitive determination, and if that's what she really wants, then the thing to do is go straight to the horse. rl |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
kurttrail wrote:
Jonny wrote: The legality question, am not qualified to answer that without any background in that area. Can you read? If so, then you should see for yourself that this motherboard cannot be changed nonsense is not part of any license that was agreed to. I doesn't take a law degree to see that. This is not a legal opinion, just friggin' common sense. I obviously made at least one person nervous with my comment about practicing law without a license. I should've known better, given the current legal climate, but CRaven annoyed me. People give legal advice all the time--to their friends, to their acquaintances, to strangers on a newsgroup. It's only a problem when the advice is a) wrong and b) presented as being accurate because the advice giver has particular credentials that apparently guarantee its accuracy. CRaven posted as a "licensing specialist," and the ordinary man on the street would take that as definitive...in this case to his detriment. But an ordinary poster who offers up an opinion and does not misrepresent himself doesn't really have anything to worry about. rl |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
Kerry Brown wrote:
kurttrail wrote: Larry Samuels wrote: Hi Rhonda, Those of us that do have access to that site CANNOT post what is there due to NDA restrictions. snip The NDA restrictions haven't stopped Carey. My understanding is if it can be googled it isn't restricted by the NDA. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...oogle+S earch It's the second hit and you don't need a password to access it. Also note there is no mention of the motherboard in the publicly accessible document. I don't know of any publicly accessible documents that say the motherboard defines the computer. None that I've ever seen. Expecially no license ever mentions this BULLSH*T! In any case even if it is on a web site I don't see how that would have anything to do with amending the end user's license. It is conceivable that an end user may not have Internet access and even if they do why would they search for an amended license agreement. Until Microsoft puts this (motherboard defines the computer) in a EULA that the end user agrees to I don't see how it can be legally enforced. In practice they can try to enforce it though activations but it would be interesting to see it challenged in court. I often change motherboards for customers. So far I have never been refused activation. Carey doesn't quote or paraphrase the SBL, as the SBL mentions NOTHING about changing the motherboard invalidates the license. http://groups.google.com/group/micro...5ae6bed?hl=en& In that post he directly quotes a password-protected covered by the NDA page. And in all of the OEM/motherboard threads he paraphrases this nonsense, and makes it seem that it is coming from an actual license that people agreed to, which I have yet to see ANY LICENSE that says anything like, the changing the motherboard creates a new computer invalidating the OEM Windows License. -- Peace! Kurt Kirsch Self-anointed Moderator http://microscum.com "It'll soon shake your Windows And rattle your walls For the times they are a-changin'." |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
kurttrail wrote: Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: If I were the original poster, I would just write to (not call) Microsoft, and ask for a determination, because this thread is totally out of control. snip It is quite simple. Read the EULA and the SBL and make a determination for yourself. I agree. But I'm not the original poster, who *didn't* read the EULA (probably can't since her computer is down) and who is now getting a very long thread full of "expert" answers, not all of which agree. Look, I didn't realize that CRaven person is not an employee of Microsoft--s/he certainly went out of his/her way to look "official" with all the titles below his/her name--so why would any other casual user have that knowledge? If I were the person asking that question...well, I read what you and Alias write pretty closely, Kurt, and for that reason, I trust your answers, but for someone who pops in to solve a single problem...it's a problem. Who are you (the generic you, not the "Kurt you", because you're a skeptic if ever there was one)going to heed? The poster with the string of titles or the poster who either has no sig or a sig with a a parody website and an apparent axe to grind? Apart from the philosophical and interpretative line of the thread, there is still a real live human being with a problem, and she came here to get it solved. She has touched off a food fight, but she still doesn't have a definitive determination, and if that's what she really wants, then the thing to do is go straight to the horse. rl No one, not me, not Carey, and not Microsoft can make a definitive determination about this unless this issue comes up before a judge and then judge makes a definitive determination. Until then, the OP needs to do is read the EULA and the SBL, and come to a determination that is best for them. If the OP thinks he/she/it agreed to follow some nonsense on a hidden password-protected site, then that is up to him/her/it. They could agree to believe that pigs can fly, if they want. All I know is that I never agree to crap on a hidden password-protected web site. What Carey claims is totally meaningless to me, and any rational person that has actually read and understood the EULA and the SBL. Anyone here that spends any length of time here eventually sees that Carey is full of it. I'd be willing to bet that most of his fellow MVPs are embarrassed by him. I just wish they'd be more vocal about admonishing him, especially over this issue, as I'm pretty positive that most MVPs don't agree with this motherboard nonsense he continually spews. You've read the EULA, and have seen no mention of the motherboard at all. Go read the SBL, http://oem.microsoft.com/downloads/P...SB_License.pdf, and you'll see that the only mention of the motherboard is that it is only ONE of FIVE components that make up a "fully assembled computer system," and that's it. No one needs to believe me. All they need to do is read for themselves, and then come to their own determination. It really is that simple. -- Peace! Kurt Kirsch Self-anointed Moderator http://microscum.com "It'll soon shake your Windows And rattle your walls For the times they are a-changin'." |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
snip
JD - Microsoft (Expert): Q: I hate to reiterate the meeting, but you said if you upgrade a mobo in any pc you are required to purchase a new os correct? A: Yes, the OEM OS is tied to the motherboard. So, if the motherboard fails while under warranty the license remains intact. However, if you are simply upgrading for feature or performance enhancements, you would need a new OS license. Roger Goh [msft] (Expert): Q: I hate to reiterate the meeting, but you said if you upgrade a mobo in any pc you are required to purchase a new os correct? A: Yes, if you UPGRADE the mobo, you need to get a new OS because the OS is tied to the mobo. Ref: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/com...5_0222_sb.mspx -- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Microsoft Community Newsgroups news://msnews.microsoft.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------- "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote: | Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote: | | If I were the original poster, I would just write to (not call) | Microsoft, and ask for a determination, because this thread is | totally out of control. | | snip | | It is quite simple. Read the EULA and the SBL and make a | determination for yourself. | | I agree. But I'm not the original poster, who *didn't* read the EULA | (probably can't since her computer is down) and who is now getting a | very long thread full of "expert" answers, not all of which agree. | | Look, I didn't realize that CRaven person is not an employee of | Microsoft--s/he certainly went out of his/her way to look "official" | with all the titles below his/her name--so why would any other casual | user have that knowledge? If I were the person asking that | question...well, I read what you and Alias write pretty closely, Kurt, | and for that reason, I trust your answers, but for someone who pops in | to solve a single problem...it's a problem. | | Who are you (the generic you, not the "Kurt you", because you're a | skeptic if ever there was one)going to heed? The poster with the string | of titles or the poster who either has no sig or a sig with a a parody | website and an apparent axe to grind? | | Apart from the philosophical and interpretative line of the thread, | there is still a real live human being with a problem, and she came here | to get it solved. She has touched off a food fight, but she still | doesn't have a definitive determination, and if that's what she really | wants, then the thing to do is go straight to the horse. | | rl |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
kurttrail wrote:
No one, not me, not Carey, and not Microsoft can make a definitive determination about this unless this issue comes up before a judge and then judge makes a definitive determination. Until then, the OP needs to do is read the EULA and the SBL, and come to a determination that is best for them. Microsoft can make a statement about how it intended its own agreement. If that statement is contrary to what the EULA says, it would be the a possible cause of action. Without first knowing how Microsoft interprets its agreement, there's no way to get to a judge. In my personal life, I just do what I believe to be the right thing. If I run into resistance, I start with a phone call or email, and I work my way up to certified mail. I've never had the desire to sue anyone, because most problems can be resolved without litigation if everyone involved is reasonable. snipped Anyone here that spends any length of time here eventually sees that Carey is full of it. I'd be willing to bet that most of his fellow MVPs are embarrassed by him. I just wish they'd be more vocal about admonishing him, especially over this issue, as I'm pretty positive that most MVPs don't agree with this motherboard nonsense he continually spews. I'm not prepared to make a judgment yet about Carey, but I was very unhappy with the hostile, sarcastic tone and lack of content in his reply to my reply to CRaven. I do know that I'm looking at a lot of sites that discuss this issue, and he is not the only person who misunderstands the EULA. It appears to me that his understanding does not derive from the EULA itself, but from interpretations he has read elsewhere. You've read the EULA, and have seen no mention of the motherboard at all. Go read the SBL, http://oem.microsoft.com/downloads/P...SB_License.pdf, and you'll see that the only mention of the motherboard is that it is only ONE of FIVE components that make up a "fully assembled computer system," and that's it. Oh, I read it. I think there's a big misunderstanding about the meaning of the legalese. I ran into a problem awhile ago with a client who died unexpectedly. It was a large estate and there was potential for litigation. I was asked to prepare a certification, as well as a file memo, and in it, I mentioned how the client (who I spoke with often) would sometimes bemoan her "incompetence." In context, she meant "I don't have a good education, and sometimes I'm overwhelmed by all I have to manage." But the word "incompetent" has a very specific legal meaning, and what she meant is not how a lawyer or judge would interpret the word. In the end, I revised the file memo, because it just had too much problem-creating potential. Lawyers and judges do not speak standard English, and if you try to interpret a term of art as the dictionary defines it, you're hosed. I'm pretty sure Carey has done something similar here. No one needs to believe me. All they need to do is read for themselves, and then come to their own determination. It really is that simple. I did both. I do believe you, but I also like to read. :) rl -- I've been through some awful worries, and some of them actually happened. Mark Twain |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
snip JD - Microsoft (Expert): Q: I hate to reiterate the meeting, but you said if you upgrade a mobo in any pc you are required to purchase a new os correct? A: Yes, the OEM OS is tied to the motherboard. So, if the motherboard fails while under warranty the license remains intact. However, if you are simply upgrading for feature or performance enhancements, you would need a new OS license. Roger Goh [msft] (Expert): Q: I hate to reiterate the meeting, but you said if you upgrade a mobo in any pc you are required to purchase a new os correct? A: Yes, if you UPGRADE the mobo, you need to get a new OS because the OS is tied to the mobo. Ref: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/com...5_0222_sb.mspx And, of course, they are referring to branded OEMs, something that Carey doesn't seem able to distinguish from generic OEMs. I just upgraded a motherboard on one of my computers and clean installed its generic OEM Home and it activated on line and passed WGA. The EULA I agreed to -- and the ONLY one I agreed to -- says nothing about upgrading motherboards necessitating a new OS, regardless of any conversations Systems Builders may have had with Microsoft. You're reaching for straws, Carey. The question is when will you be man enough to admit it so we can all move on. Alias |
My pc mother board has died - Install xp oem
Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote: snip JD - Microsoft (Expert): Q: I hate to reiterate the meeting, but you said if you upgrade a mobo in any pc you are required to purchase a new os correct? A: Yes, the OEM OS is tied to the motherboard. So, if the motherboard fails while under warranty the license remains intact. However, if you are simply upgrading for feature or performance enhancements, you would need a new OS license. Roger Goh [msft] (Expert): Q: I hate to reiterate the meeting, but you said if you upgrade a mobo in any pc you are required to purchase a new os correct? A: Yes, if you UPGRADE the mobo, you need to get a new OS because the OS is tied to the mobo. Ref: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/com...5_0222_sb.mspx The "experts" being quoted are totally irrelevant since this particular definition of "motherboard" and its link to the Windows operating systems needs to be stated by an Officer of Microsoft in public. Microsoft has never done this nor has it published this fact for the open record anywhere. Where is the evidence that is being asked throughout this thread? If it is under a password-protected page to a select few who are also bound by a NDA, then it is binding only to those who have an association to Microsoft through this manner. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2004 - 2006 PCbanter
Comments are property of their posters