Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
It looks like they are supposed to be shaking hands, but it looks more like someone is receiving a payoff. Maybe that is how queers shake hands, tickling each other's palms. Godless people do not know and recognize that their is a God and that He will judge the wicked. He has said that homosexuality is an abdominal sin. The very physical makeup of a man and woman shows what is right. Therefore, Apple's sexual pervert president is the reason the cracks are happening. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/09/apple-walled-garden-starting-to-show-cracks.html |
Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
On 13-1-2019 19:58, Ike wrote:
It looks like they are supposed to be shaking hands, but it looks more like someone is receiving a payoff. Maybe that is how queers shake hands, tickling each other's palms. Godless people do not cut Ah!! religious warmongering!!! Do you really have to boast about your deficient morals??? |
Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
On 1/13/19 11:35 AM, Sjouke Burry wrote:
On 13-1-2019 19:58, Ike wrote: ** It looks like they are supposed to be shaking hands, but it looks more like someone is receiving a payoff.* Maybe that is how queers shake hands, tickling each other's palms.* Godless people do not cut Ah!! religious warmongering!!! Do you really have to boast about your deficient morals??? And his bad spelling in the original post. Abdominal relates to the belly. I.e. the "abdomen". Gluttony is the abdominal sin. Tribal leaders trying to raise their population did find non-reproductive sex less than optimal for their warlike purposes. Burry, your spelling is abominable. Sin which means inconvenience is certainly different things to different people. |
Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
On 13/01/2019 11.58 AM, Ike wrote:
Apple's sexual pervert president Ah. A zealot using religion to promote bigotry. Plonk. -- James Moe jmm-list at sohnen-moe dot com Think. |
Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
On 14/01/2019 19:53, James Moe wrote:
On 13/01/2019 11.58 AM, Ike wrote: Apple's sexual pervert president Ah. A zealot using religion to promote bigotry. Plonk. surey he is using bigotry to promote religion? -- "Women actually are capable of being far more than the feminists will let them." |
Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
On 1/14/19 12:05 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 14/01/2019 19:53, James Moe wrote: On 13/01/2019 11.58 AM, Ike wrote: Apple's sexual pervert president ** Ah. A zealot using religion to promote bigotry. ** Plonk. surey he is using bigotry to promote religion? He is an idiot using two forms of idiocy to promote himself as a evangelistic idiot. Happy Religious Freedom Day! Celebrate Religious Freedom Day on January 16! https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/13/1825808/-Happy-Religious-Freedom-Day-The-Sunday-Good-News-Roundup-GNRU?utm_campaign=trending On the other hand I am an idiot evangelizing sensibility and celebrating the brief moment of sanity that kicked the Churches out of direct power in the USA. Of course the Founders were much closer to the time of the disastrous European religious wars. Present day politicians seldom learn enough history to appreciate the reasons that the USA took up Freedom of Religion/Belief. bliss -- bliss dash SF 4 ever at dslextreme dot com |
Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
In article ,
"Ike" writes: [whatever] Just a little point, I think the word is abhominable, not abdominal, not unless someone's belly button is being molested, anyway. That aside, even if certain behavior is deeply wrong, ranting about it is still wrongly and unhelpfully judgemental, IMO. Consider that unless you're a natural hater, even if you don't participate or condone the behavior, there's probably people you care about that do...not that their lifestyle should necessarily be mainstreamed, but only despotic theocrats actually want to go as far back as stoning or even close to it. People may not need custom wedding cakes, but they certainly need to be able to get food, medical care, jobs, housing, etc. And to be able to go for a walk withot worrying about some skinhead bashing them with a bat from a passing pickup truck (which I seem to recall having actually happened, or something much like that, anyway). |
Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
On 15/01/2019 00:03, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
In article , "Ike" writes: [whatever] Just a little point, I think the word is abhominable, not abdominal, not unless someone's belly button is being molested, anyway. No, it is in fact abominable... :-) -- A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. |
Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
On 15/01/2019 14:42, Wolf K wrote:
On 2019-01-15 06:38, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 15/01/2019 00:03, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: In article , ****"Ike" writes: [whatever] Just a little point, I think the word is abhominable, not abdominal, not unless someone's belly button is being molested, anyway. No, it is in fact abominable... :-) In fact abhominable -- abominable. German "unmenschlich" hints at how the word's meaning originated. In fact abhominable -- abominable. But only up to 1300 AD. For the last 600 years no English speaking person has added the 'h'... -- Any fool can believe in principles - and most of them do! |
Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
On 2019-01-15, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/01/2019 14:42, Wolf K wrote: On 2019-01-15 06:38, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 15/01/2019 00:03, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: In article , ****"Ike" writes: [whatever] Just a little point, I think the word is abhominable, not abdominal, not unless someone's belly button is being molested, anyway. No, it is in fact abominable... :-) In fact abhominable -- abominable. German "unmenschlich" hints at how the word's meaning originated. In fact abhominable -- abominable. But only up to 1300 AD. For the last 600 years no English speaking person has added the 'h'... Since spelling was only stadardised about 300 years ago, I strongly doubt your contention. From Wilipedia Etymology. First attested in the 1300s, a variant of abominable, possibly influenced by Latin ab + homine (“man”). The unnecessary addition of h to words was once common; compare abholish (abolish). Abandoned by the 1600s.. Compare also abhomination. In fact it was used far more recently that that PS Allen The Age of Erasmus 1914. although he did put it into single quotes suggesting he was using Erasmus's spelling. Anyway, your contention is false. |
Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
On 2019-01-15, William Unruh wrote:
On 2019-01-15, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 15/01/2019 14:42, Wolf K wrote: On 2019-01-15 06:38, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 15/01/2019 00:03, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: In article , ****"Ike" writes: [whatever] Just a little point, I think the word is abhominable, not abdominal, not unless someone's belly button is being molested, anyway. No, it is in fact abominable... :-) In fact abhominable -- abominable. German "unmenschlich" hints at how the word's meaning originated. In fact abhominable -- abominable. But only up to 1300 AD. For the last 600 years no English speaking person has added the 'h'... Since spelling was only stadardised about 300 years ago, I strongly doubt your contention. From Wilipedia Etymology. First attested in the 1300s, a variant of abominable, possibly influenced by Latin ab + homine (“man”). The unnecessary addition of h to words was once common; compare abholish (abolish). Abandoned by the 1600s.. Compare also abhomination. In fact it was used far more recently that that PS Allen The Age of Erasmus 1914. although he did put it into single quotes suggesting he was using Erasmus's spelling. Anyway, your contention is false. See also https://www.collinsdictionary.com/di...sh/abhominable where the useage is plotted. It is rare, but used until about 1950. |
Apple's famous walled garden is starting to show cracks
On 14/01/2019 21.23, Wolf K wrote:
On 2019-01-14 15:05, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 14/01/2019 19:53, James Moe wrote: On 13/01/2019 11.58 AM, Ike wrote: Apple's sexual pervert president ** Ah. A zealot using religion to promote bigotry. ** Plonk. surey he is using bigotry to promote religion? Whatever works.... FWIW, a Pew Res4earch urvey found that people (well, Americans, actually, but I'm sure it applies to others, too) shop around to find a religion/church that agrees with their politics. No, we don't :-p But I don't see what that may have to do with computers. But that is what Ike is, a troll. -- Cheers, Carlos. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2004 - 2006 PCbanter
Comments are property of their posters