Thread: Kasperski
View Single Post
  #34  
Old December 5th 17, 01:19 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,600
Default Kasperski

On 12/04/2017 09:17 AM, Scott wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 05:41:32 -0800, T wrote:

On 12/04/2017 02:15 AM, Scott wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 17:05:08 -0800, T wrote:

On 12/03/2017 04:40 AM, Scott wrote:
Does a statement by a citizen act as a guarantee against interference
by the Russian State?

No and why just worry about the Russians. You are being
overly selective.

I was following the stace of the US and UK governments, whom I assume
know something about the subject.



You are overlooking the tons of political nastiness going on
over the swamp losing the election and the fake Russian dossier
the loser's dirty tricks campaign ginned up.

If you are worried a espionage, don't use anything from India
or China.

My internet security program does not originate in India or China, so
this is not pertinent to the question I asked.

I assume you mean anything IT related.

Yes. And I was pointing out about being selective.

If you mean that non IT products such as clothing and footware do not
contain malware then I would say there is some logic in being
selective.


You know what I meant.

Kaspersky is just in the unfortunate position of being
between some nasty geopolitical politics. n Their
product is a good product. And it has been gone
over with a fine toothed comb.

By the Russian government?


You know what I meant. Stop slicing the baloney.


It is not the Russian government spying on you.

Unless the Russian goverment is spying on Kasperski?


All governments are spying the asses off. Kaspersky just
got caught in the middle of some nasty dirty tricks politics.

Just my opinion, but starting up the cold war again is stupid.
The swamp lost. Grow up, get over it, practice your goose
stepping, and do a better job of convincing the American people
next time. And stop looking for Russians under your beds.
We have real enemies out there to deal with. The Russians
are not them. And Russians did not steel our election. The
public just didn't like the hoodlum and voted against her.

So your point is, caller, that there should be no concerns about
reports of Russian cyber-espionage, no concerns about Kasperski being
based in Russia, the US and UK governments are displaying paranoia and
given a choice between Kasperski and a non-Russian alternative there
is no reason to go for the latter - and all because the head of
Kasperski says so.


My point is to not let Gleichschaltung be your point of reference.


Ads