Was he wearing his flak jacket on this one? Jolly good show mate.

--
sqr
Overseer: alt.os.windows-xp
--
"Kadaitcha Man" wrote in message
news:81723baca4247ac6ccbbbe61d500781d@TeraNews...
zarathustra wrote:
Kadaitcha Man doodled:

That's bad luck for you. There are no second prizes. You see, you are
the one who as claimed to be a fully paid-up 'Word Police Officer',
yet you hyphenate compound words that end in ly,

Yes, that did happen. Just goes to show I'm not infallible.

It also goes to show that you are an idiot.

Kadaitcha's Medical Dictionary: An IDIOT is a person without understanding
or ordinary mental capacity, one who does not advance beyond the mental
age
of three years; distinguished from an imbecile, who is capable of some
mental and physical education. An IMBECILE is one who is congenitally
weak-minded yet not incapable of education; a mental defective not
advancing
beyond the mental age of seven years. A MORON is a feeble-minded person of
higher grade than an imbecile, one who does not advance beyond the mental
age of 12 years.

You are an idiot who has not learned that spelling, typo and grammar
laming
is the refuge of the utterly inadequate. Just in case you're bewlidered by
the phrase the utterly inadequate, it is constructed of a noun with a
plural
verb. You do know what they are, don't you? You must, I mean, after all,
you
are a fully paid up 'Word Police Officer', aren't you?

Don't be a silly-billy.
'inappropriate'?
Never...........!
Oh, mention. Mention!

No.

All of that means two things; you
are a ****wit lamer; you are an easy mark for anyone with a
rudimentary knowledge of the English language.

Heh. If I were that gurning fishboi, I'd be squawking 'stalker' right
now. Thank **** I'm not.

There are a number of issues in that paragraph. Please clarify:

A) "If I were that gurning fishboi,"

Is "that gurning fishboi" in the third person? Or is gurning being used as
an adjective? If the latter, you have missed a comma out of the phrase. If
the former, there is no contextual reference to support the phrase, hence
it
is spurious. If neither, then is the word fishboi in the first or second
person?

B) "If I were that gurning fishboi, I'd be squawking 'stalker' right now."

Putting aside the issue of your babble being completely unintelligible, as
indicated by the need to pose the questions in A) to ascertain context,
meaning and intent, the sentence has two independent clauses, viz "If you]
were that gurning fishboi" and "[you]'d be squawking 'stalker' right now."
The two indpendent clauses are closed by a single concluding statement,
viz
"Thank **** I'm not." Which of the two independent clauses is the
concluding
statement concluding?

To save yourself more embarrassment, you should restrict your posts
to the following:

Embarrassment? This is usenet, you dildo. Who the **** gets
embarrassed in usenet?

PPfffttt....

Ah, the sweet sounds of a rapidly deflating ego.

--
Kadaitcha Man: Usenet Anarchist - http://kadaitcha.kicks-ass.org:83/
Anarchy is having to put up with things that **** you off.

Kadaitcha Man: Moderator, 24hoursupport.helpdesk