David in Devon
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

[snip]

Due to your well known and established track record as that of a
sociopathic scumbag lying, stalking troll, I don't believe you.


You *should* believe me.

How? When you wrote this:
Message-ID:
I proceeded to answer other questions you provided in the same
email asking about it. You indicated no issue with me, no
accusation of my being a 'bad guy' until years later, here on
usenet.

That's correct. I didn't let on that you were a target and I'd
scored a bullseye.

Other than your known dishonesty, is there a particular reason
you aren't sharing the entire contents of your inquiry leading up
to that paste?

I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to
tell any newbies about you?

*** end paste

To which I responded:

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155063392200

I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to
tell any newbies about you?

You're about as honest as you are sober, David.

Say you were setting me up the entire time. Does that mean (as I
accused you of) that you tried to provide a google street map view
of my house on purpose, then? And when you met in person with
Aardvark and discussed the matter, were you knowingly lying right
to his face?

Are you now admitting that every attempt you made to get to know
me, to be my friend, etc via email were all lies?

Are you also admitting that you told various lies to GM to have a
cease fire on jenn arranged? Under normal conditions, that would
void the agreement. Lucky for jenn, I see no reason for her to
have any issues because you're a dishonest drunkard.

Are you also admitting that you've told lies concerning other
peace arrangements in play?

Are you also admitting that I cannot trust a single thing you
write as being in any way truthful?

So have you been lying for years on usenet or the emails, or both,
then David?

Any reason you neglected to respond to this, days ago, David?
You've been active on usenet and the www. Are you avoiding the
reply because, you don't have any answers to the questions that'll
give anyone the idea you're a "good guy"; rather, it'll only help
to confirm (not that anyone needs further confirmation at this
point) that you are in all actuality, a dangerous nutjob stalker
amongst other things, none of which are good. You can claim to be
something you're not (a good guy) all you like, David. It doesn't
hide what you actually are (a bad guy).

I already covered the part of the post he's never (afaik) shared
when he's out to remind me of something I wrote, but, I'll do it
again, just to drive that point home. As I said, I like to be
thorough. This is the remainder of the post that David only shared
a section of, until recently when he screwed up (he didn't double
check, I'm sure of it) and provided the url to the post in full.

Begin:

I am taking the time to write you all this not because you are
the only VXer "out there" but because I have a feeling that you
will understand what I am trying to say and who knows... you may
even take the time to think about what I am saying.

I understand what your trying to say, and I'm sorry if one of my
viruses ever does cause you harm. Your clearly one of the few
people on this planet that doesn't just make my skin crawl.

*** end snippit paste

It's the naked truth! :-)

You're clearly allergic to the truth, David. Why else would you have
such a hard time accepting it?

To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he

https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php




--
Distance lends enchantment to the view..T.Campbell