But I kind of like headers...

--
The Man in the High Castle nospaming nospam.com wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Man in the High Castle nospaming nospam.com
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject: Has anyone *not* gotten the 1809 update yet?
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2019 17:22:19 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: qi6t7b$a4q$3 dont-email.me
References: psKdnfTwHbe_WcfBnZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d giganews.com q3h8he$1qn$1 dont-email.me q3ha0e$9oa$1 dont-email.me q3hosl$7lc$1 dont-email.me q3hr66$mf3$1 dont-email.me oGB1F.245036$GS1.242545 fx48.iad
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2019 15:22:19 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="13d1945ed8e6a8d356c6b0552af91eed"; logging-data="10394"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18h5CxWFfzv5Ku19AEAyfsy"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xdy8fONsdPnLZ2iBYYVmMwpTYxY=
In-Reply-To: oGB1F.245036$GS1.242545 fx48.iad
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org alt.comp.os.windows-10:99752

John Doe wrote:
The Man in the High Castle nospaming nospam.com wrote:

Neil wrote:
The Man in the High Castle wrote:
Neil wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote:

Obviously it's a highly controversial upgrade, maybe it's best
to not ever upgrade to it, but Microsoft is already talking
about the 1904 upgrade. I haven't been offered this upgrade
yet. Microsoft usually doesn't allow an upgrade between two
non-adjacent versions. Just concerned that I may get stuck on
1803 forever, or I'm going to be offered the 1809 just weeks
before 1904 is offered to me, and I'd have to go through two
major upgrades soon after each other.

My Win10s are still on 1803. As I see it, they work reliably
and as a result I also can work. If a newer version such as
1904 brings something to the table that I can't do without, I'd
get a computer known to be compatible with that version. But, I
don't see anything like that in 1809, so...

I find it to be more stable.

More stable than what?

Than 1803, what else, hot shot?

Given the exponentially wide range of hardware, firmware and
system configurations I doubt that there is a general stability
factor between any one Win10 version and all of them.

It's more stable on my machine.

But like the dip**** said in another post, that "more stable could be
my imagination".


**** off Headers ****er.