David wrote:

No, I can't, because it's not a "ruling," IT"S THE LAW! I'll follow
the laws of the land, as I interpret them, not according to how you
or Microsoft interpret them! Don't like my interpretation, the you
both can go sue me, it's a free country!


Here in Calif. WE have Highway signs that simply say "Speed Limit
65" Following your "Logic" I interpret that to mean the MINIMUN Speed
limit and that I'm allowed to drive as fast as I want above 65mph.
Funny, I just don't think it works that way.

Well, since there is plenty of court precedent that establishes that the
Speed Limit is a maximum speed, you'd look pretty damned foolish! Since
there is absolutely no legal precedent that establishes MS's legal
interpretation of their enforcing their post-sale EULA usage terms on
private non-commercial individuals, my interpretation is just as valid
as MS's, until a court decides!

Are you a Judge?

Is Microsoft? No, it's a proven corporate criminal!

Have you passed the BAR? No?

Did Microsoft? Well, they do have lawyers on their staff, but that
hasn't stop MS from infringing on patents, or from becoming an illegal
predatory monopoly!

Then you are not legally qualified to interpret the law.

Then neither is MS! And as I said on many occasions, "why let MS be the
Judge in your own home, when they are too afraid to bring their One
Computer EULA term before a *real* Judge? Until then, shouldn't you be
the Judge in your own home?"

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.kurttrail.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"