Arlen_Holder
news alt.comp.freeware, wrote:

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:08:48 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote:

Liar.... You originally
thought it to be nothing more than a 'syntax error'; and I'll be
happy to provide the MID to your post, if you'd like to see it.

Hi Diesel,
I think I'm slowly, belatedly, beginning to better understand you
now.

I somehow doubt that...

o I reported honestly that I was hoping I could figure out
the syntax o Then I reported honestly that I failed to get "net
use" to work with FTP

You call that being a "liar".
I call it being honest.

you were told, multiple times that it wasn't an issue of syntax, you
continued to state otherwise. Do you need the MIDs to your posts,
Arlen? I realize the way in which you access usenet doesn't afford
you the same liberties as I have. I'd be more than happy to help you
locate your posts.

It's interesting how you see those facts in a completely different
way.

The original words you wrote, or, the revised edition you provided
above?

I need to study you more closely to comprehend _why_ you
think that way.

I'm not a science experiment, Arlen...

Uhh, You've added NO value to this thread. You've pimped and
prodded for others information concerning what you what to do
with your Android device.

Hi Diesel,
I think I understand where you and I differ, having read what
you've written on this topic over the past few days.

You believe, apparently, that waving a mythical magical wand
claiming all sorts of capabilities is added value, while I believe
that actual commands, and their results, with annotated
screenshots replete with URLs backing up everything ... is the
added value.

The difference, between your idea of value, and mine, is stellar:
o One is magical hand waving, while
o The other is cold hard reproducible facts.

Your ability to comprehend and understand things is udder ****e,
Arlen...

No wonder you see no value in my posts.
o All my posts contained actual documented reproducible facts

No, they didn't. Do you need some clear examples?

o None of your posts contained any actual reproducible facts

That's not true either. Do you need some clear examples of those
posts as well?

They aren't imaginary, Frank's using one himself AND he didn't
learn about it from me.

Hehhehheh... Hey Diesel ...

Hiding your ignorance with laughter, again?

Do you want proof that Frank's so-called solution is entirely
imaginary?

Franks er, ehm, so called solution isn't imaginary, Arlen. I also
told you that you were thinking about the problem in the wrong
direction, in this case. I told you from the get go, there's several
ways I know of for you to do what you're wanting to do...Franks much
more clear with that than I was, but, I was intentionally being
evasive. [g]

In very rare occasions do I find myself actually knowing only ONE way
to do something. That just goes against my grain and my understanding
of things I.T. Crypto aside, of course.

Btw, Arlen. I've been playing with an android device the past few
days. I've tried auto-transfer file lite by noople; it's restricted
to a single customizable entry. If you want more, you have to pay
about 2 dollars. Seems like a fair deal to me. Works as advertised. I
set it to the folder where my cell stored screenshots and it put them
where I wanted them, behind the scenes.

I've also tested bfilesync; it doesn't have the limitation the one
mentioned above does, the interface is about the same between the two
and so far, I've heard not a squeak about paying for it, trial
feature limits (I have 5 folders presently setup on it though; not a
pile) or advertising.

These aren't redirectors Arlen, they can't reroute where the file is
going to be saved, they can only ensure it winds up there, after the
fact. They'll both move more than pictures, too. Anything you want,
basically.

Which goes to prove my previous point, Arlen. I'm
not the only one who knows how to do what you'd like to do. I'm
disinclined to acquiesce to your request. Means, "No"

Hi Diesel,
Thanks for being wholly consistent in letting me know, again, that
you have the answers, but that you won't tell me them, because, I
think it was that you said "you wanted to make me beg for them",
is that right?

No, that's not Right. Do you have an MID where I wrote that Arlen? I
suspect you won't find one, because, I didn't write any such thing to
or about you.

I fully comprehend the problem you're having. The solutions I
have aren't imaginary nor are they magical.

Hi Diesel,

You're consistent, so that's good as you also said, at another
point in time, that you always had all the answers, but you won't
tell them, because, as I recall, you "wanted to make us work for
them", is that right?

Uhh, no. Again, No. Oh wait.. heh it's been retained. Below.

and I, for reasons you already know, have refused to provide YOU
any specific information that will allow you to do what you've
spent over a month now trying to figure out.

Hi Diesel,
I appreciate that you're consistent in that you know all the
answers but you won't tell them, because you want me to find them
out for myself.

ROFL. Sure, okay. Go with that then.

I appreciate the care you put into developing my skill set.

You're welcome Arlen. You're very very welcome! Glad to help you out!

And, I bet, despite Frank forking over general knowledge of one
particular, reliable, way of doing it, you still won't be able to
get it up and going without further assistance.

Hi Diesel,
Let's not forget that I think Frank has already begun to prove his
so-called claimed solution will turn out to be wholly imaginary.

It's not, Arlen.

We still have time though on that...as there is an entire thread
on that topic alone, where I'm sure the proof will be in the taste
of the pudding.

In other words, you're going to fish for more information based on
what Frank already provided, if (probably doesn't matter) he doesn't
come forward with more details concerning it.. Is that right?

I'm funny that way, Diesel.

Yes, you are. But, not in a good way.

Again, it's nice to know that only you know the answer to the
question, where, since you're so caring, you wont' tell anyone,
unless they beg, and even then, you want to make them work for it.

I'm not the only one who knows. I didn't ask you or anyone else to
beg, and I've consistently stated I'm only making YOU, specifically
you, Arlen, work for it. Since you didn't wanna be an adult about the
original problem and 0wn your mistake, yea, you'll work for it, if
you want ANY help from me.

It's noble of you to be so consistently considerate (teach a man
to fish).

Hey, thanks. No really. Some people don't see the value in what I've
done with some others. Atleast, not at first. I've made some into
damn good troubleshooting technicians, though.

I guess I'll have to beg or work harder for it, or I won't get
them, right?

I don't think begging is going to get you anywhere. Nobody wants that
from you, afaik. Least of all me.

For example, the holy grail would be MTPDrive functionality using
freeware. I'm sure there is a way to do that - I just don't know
what it is yet.



Sigh.
I should never have upset you in the first place.
Mea culpa.

ROFL... You didn't upset me, Arlen.

Now I'm rally kicking myself in the pants for having ****ed you
off.

LOL...Sure you are.

Now I know you would never do that, Diesel, in that you'd never
claim you had a method that works without that method actually
existing like Frank does ... but that Frank. He's different from
you.

That's why you and I get along so well Diesel, compared to Frank.

Huh? I don't know either of you, but, I prefer discussion with Frank
over you.



--
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
================================================== =
What's the difference between spit and swallow?
Forty pounds of pressure on the back of her head.