"w_tom" wrote in
oups.com:


I challenged, without apologies, those who would promote myths.
Accurate facts are always more important than personal emotions.
Observation must not be rebranded as a science fact. Leythos posts
this one observation as fact repeatedly. He knows only from what was
observed. He did not provide professional citations, underlying
reasons, numbers, and manufacturer numerical specs. Those other
prerequisites are required to convert an observation into fact.
Leythos even ignores undamaged appliances. No way around that
defective logic. E-mail would not solve this problem. Leythos even
uses selective data sampling. Error in his logic should be obvious to
anyone with science grasp - how to make a fact. Leythos rebrands only
an observation - without other prerequisites such as theory, numbers
manufacturer datasheets, etc. When challenged, he cannot admit his
obvious logical error.


Not personal emotions.

If is fact.

Fact, that in his experience, no items connected through plug-in surge
suppressors had been damaged while other item may have been, even
connected thru the same AC outlet.

It is NOT an opinion that they were not damaged. It is fact. Do they
still function ? Yes, fact, and, anyone that uses them will sate the same
thing, fact.

The real problem here, and with MANY, MANY people that think they are
smarter than eveyone else, is that you fail to realize that theory is
just that, theory, and once you apply that theory to REAL WORLD
situations, that theory may or may not pan out to be an exact science in
the REAL application.