On 21/10/2018 02:48, Eric Stevens wrote:

On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:45:14 -0000 (UTC), Chris
wrote:

Roger Blake wrote:

Yes, it is tough dealing with these Warmists and their irrational,
pseudo-religious belief that *we* are causing the earth's climate to
change and that we will therefore take control of the climate to steer
it back to whatever we think it should be.

It is the denialists who cannot base their beliefs on science, as may
shown simply by the fact that throughout the entirety of this thread and
elsewhere neither Eric nor any other denialist has managed to produce
any provenance for their beliefs that is able to pass even the most
cursory rational investigation.

It's utter bilge of course, but it doesn't matter how much evidence to the
contrary you put in front of the climate hucksters and their rank-and-file
useful idiots.

Whereas denialists such as yourself just make these sweeping claims
without any scientific provenance whatsoever, and are then abusive,
when, unsurprisingly, no-one believes you!

What's it like looking in the mirror? The evidence is hugely supportive of
human induced climate change. There is evidence to support other theories,
but it isn't anywhere near as complete nor been shown to influence the
climate as much as CO2.

Nor does CO2. :-)

Smiley or not, that has been proven to be a lie in so many different
ways, most convincingly of all by the original 1850s experiments and the
Berkeley results, that the fact that you are now obviously lying proves
that you've lost the rational argument.

With so much power, control, taxes, funding, grants, etc.
on the line,

The balance of power and money is massively in favour of the fossil fuel
industry who have a vested ibterest in sowing doubt wherever they can.

Yep. All those scientists who work to show that anthropogenic CO2
causes global warming work for free.

Yes they *do*, as can be proven by the sort of minimal investigation
which you could and should have done yourself throughout this entire
thread, if only to save you making a **** of yourself, and in this
particular case especially as someone else has *already* pointed this
out previously in this same thread ...

http://ipcc.ch/index.htm (my emphasis)

"Assessments of climate change by the IPCC, drawing on the work of
hundreds of scientists from all over the world, enable policymakers at
all levels of government to take sound, evidence-based decisions. They
represent extraordinary value as the authors volunteer their time and
expertise. The running costs of the Secretariat, including the
organization of meetings and travel costs of delegates from developing
countries and countries with economies in transition, are covered
through the IPCC Trust Fund."

So the academics who are members of the IPCC *do* give their time for
free, in the sense they are not paid up IPCC employees, rather their
time is *donated* by their real employers, which are academic or
scientific institutions such as universities, government departments, etc.

the junk-science based climate hoax has taken on a life of
its own.

Sorry, but you're being played.

Yes, it's a wonder that they can't feel their strings being pulled.