David_B
Thu, 14 May 2020 06:56:39 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 14/05/2020 02:31, Snit wrote:
On 5/13/20 3:49 PM, Wolffan wrote:
On 13 May 2020, David_B wrote
(in article ):

On 12/05/2020 17:10, Snit wrote:
On 5/12/20 2:12 AM, Diesel wrote:
...
Mike Easter doesn't believe your sober, David. He recently
asked if you'd been drinking again. You ignored him just as
you have Apd, Shadow, myself, and others. No David, snits
method of dealing with people isn't working. He's just as
despised as you are, possibly more so. And! One reason is
shared between you; you're both very well known liars.
Seriously, both of you, well known for this.

My method of dealing with your trolling has been at least more
effective
than most -- you ran off, scared. You are starting to troll me
again, though you pretend to not read my posts. No difference:
as you troll me I remind you of some of your past idiotic
nonsense:

--------------------------------------------------------

You made up a claim where I said I would decode things
OTHER THAN hex, or that I could decode AZ code on my own.
It is a complete and utter fantasy on your part. Either you
are lying to yourself or you are lying to me. It does not
matter which: either way it is not true.

I made no such claim, Snit. I stated that you offered to
decode other posts I wrote in HEX if I continued.

Ah, so you no longer back these claims of yours:
-----
You claimed that you'd decode messages I encoded, if i
continued so that David could read them. Well, you thought
you'd be able to, anyhow. I was just curious to see if you
could do as you thought you could. And, it's pretty
obvious by now, you were more than slightly bull****ting
about your abilities.
-----
You have yet to quote where I said what you attributed to me:
that I was
claiming to be able to decode ANYTHING other than hex at the
time. You made up that claim... and now it is clear you know
that.

------
You decoded something I wrote in hex, yes. When you read
what it was, you indicated you'd just decode the rest of
them for David, going so far as to write a utility to do
it for him, if I continued posting in that manner, just to
be a dick towards me. So, I decided to see if you could do
as you claimed you could.
------
Good to see you understand I never made the claim you lied
about me doing here.

------
As I suspected, you couldn't do anything with it. HEX was
as far as you were going to be able to go concerning posts
I didn't want David reading easily, despite your claim to
the contrary.
------
And another example of this lie of yours you now accept is not
true. Great! You can see your past lies were, of course, lies.
Happy to see it. Keep in mind I knew you were lying the whole
time about my having made such a claim.

--------------------------------------------------------

Snit isn't who you think he is, David. Your reputation is bad
enough without aligning yourself with that learning disabled,
severely compromised, hardly literate, idiot.

See: you show you are terrified of me and angry with me -- all
because I
do not respond to your trolling as you wish.

...

He makes claims which he cannot support.

oh, the sheer irony...

How so?

Dustin is *NOT* in contact with "my inner circle" as he claims.
:-(

I believe him. I don’t believe you.

You can believe as you wish... but what does the evidence show?
THAT is, to me, what is more important.

Some 'techie' folk seem to lack ANY sense of humour - ESPECIALLY
'foreigners'! ;-)

What does your statement have to do with what's been written, David?
Are you going to try and play your accusation of my hacking into your
computers as a joke, then? Was I getting too close with the
journal question? And, the proper term for what you accused me of
would be cracking, David. There's a difference, and, no, I'm not
surprised you forget it, again.

I'm 'old school' British - brought up with Alf Garnett!

You're a disgrace to the British people, actually. There's nothing
old school or otherwise respectable about you, David.


--
When cows laugh, does milk come out of their nose?