On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 23:47:31 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:

I considered identifying myself to him after the fact, but you
never know how thin the edge is with some people and I didn't want to tip
him over.

I don't give a **** what "nym" someone uses to post as it doesn't matter.
o A nym is just a single line in a header.

The only part of the header which is meaningful is the SUBJECT line.
o The BODY of the article is where the on-topic technical value lies.

My point, Char Jackson, is that J.P. Gilliver is incapable of adding value.
o The proof is that nobody can find a _single_ thread from him, of value.

Not even one.
o In his entire life.

Not one thread of on-topic technical value to this newsgroup from him.
o Do you deny that fact?

Bear in mind I added on-topic technical value in this thread...
o You and J.P. Giliver are utterly incapable of doing so.

All JP Gilliver "can" do, Char Jackson, is play silly infantile games.

The proof is in me pointing to EXACTLY what J.P. Gilliver posts.
o It's that simple to prove J.P. Gilliver is a worthless piece of ****.

However...
o I believe in the water under the bridge philosophy, Char Jackson.

Rest assured, I follow the "mirror" tactic; if you post as an adult,
I treat you as an adult, where the nym you post under is meaningless.

The problem I'm pointing out is that J.P. Gilliver has _never_ even once
posted a thread of adult on-topic value to Usenet - in the entire history
of Usenet.

I will continue to ignore both you and J.P. Gilliver, forever, unless and
until you post your utterly worthless drivel to threads that I author.

If either you, or he, actually composed a thread of on-topic technical
value, or if you responded with on-topic technical value to a thread that I
initiated, I'd congratulate you.

Can you name even a _single_ thread of on-topic technical value that J.P.
Gilliver has ever authored, Char Jackson?

Not even one?
o That proves my point, does it not?

However...
o I do believe in the water under the bridge philosophy, Char Jackson.

If you or J.P. Gilliver ever posted on-topic technical value...
o I'd congratulate you on posting as an actual adult.

It has just never happened.
--
There are only two kinds of people on Usenet, one of which adds value.