Thread: XP Validation
View Single Post
  #34  
Old January 17th 18, 02:49 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,alt.windows7.general
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 937
Default XP Validation

Ken Blake
Mon, 15 Jan 2018
19:00:25 GMT in alt.windows7.general, wrote:

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:34:19 +0000, Java Jive
wrote:


I rest my case. You are an arrogant bull****ter, to whom I've
already paid far more attention than your childish
attention-seeking deserves, and will not be paying any more.




Glad to hear you won't be paying him any more attention. Please
don't reply to trolls (it's best to kill them, as I do). If you
reply, it makes the rest of us read message from troll
Attachment decoded: untitled-1.txt


I find it interesting Ken how you had no prior issues with me, until
you decided I should stop responding to the idiot David Brooks. When
I explained why I wasn't going to do so, you decided to filter
further replies from me. Which is certainly your perogative.

But, to agree with a poster who is flatout lying about me, well,
that's another matter entirely. In fact, it puts you in the same
category as the stalking, lying, troll, known as David Brooks.

So in that case, I'm not offended in the least bit that you can't
read posts I write unless someone quotes them. I wouldn't want you to
gain useful knowledge off my back, that you could have gotten
yourself had you not made the decision to toss me into your
binbucket.

Anyone who wants to take the time can fact check every single reply
of mine on this thread and see for themselves that I wasn't
bull****ting about any of it. It's not a difficult task to do, and, I
didn't provide any information one couldn't find on their own (and
verify what I wrote is accurate in the process) with a search engine.

I simply ****ed off some old retired individual who wasn't much of a
tech in the field by his own failure to recognize various
key/installation/verification schemes put into use for the XP family
by Microsoft. The individual erroneously took issue with a suggestion
I made to the OP concerning reloading a VLK edition and being done
with the activation nonsense from then on. Java incorrectly assumed
that if the OP followed my suggestion, they'd be stuck in so far as
being able to get updates upto the point MS discontinued the OS. And,
as I rightly pointed out, Java was wrong.

I state again, any actual technician worth his/her salt already knew
about every single thing I shared concerning the subject. And, any so
called 'tech' who didn't, wasn't all that knowledgeable of the OS in
question.



--
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
================================================== =
What goes around usually gets dizzy and falls over.
Ads