On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:04:28 -0400, "(PeteCresswell)" wrote:

Per (PeteCresswell):
Are you using redundancy in your implementation of DriveBender ?

OK, I think I have it doped out: you are not.... right?

In DriveBender, I have redundancy enabled on the folder that holds the many
sub-folders containing our life's collection of digital photos, scanned
documents that we care about, home movies, etc. I figure almost everything
else has limited value and can probably be replaced, if necessary.

I *expect* to have hard drive failures, but so far, knock on wood, there
haven't been any.

And if/when you do want redundancy, you will implement SnapRaid on top
of DriveBender....

Am I even close ?

Yes, that was the plan since the two get along well together and don't get
in each other's way. I may still do that, but I'm finding that my need for a
multi-TB storage pool is actually diminishing, so I've been putting it off.