View Single Post
  #3  
Old January 5th 10, 03:05 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.security
karthikbalaguru
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Raw socket support in Winsock ?

On Jan 5, 4:54*pm, Andrew McLaren wrote:
karthikbalaguru wrote:
I am eager to know the reasons for the raw socket
support in the Winsock interface during the initial
Windows XP release ?


http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...48(VS.85).aspx


Thx for the link !

As per the link, the ability to send traffic over raw sockets
has been restricted in several ways in new Windows
releases after 'Windows XP with SP2' .

The reasons for the below changes w.r.t Raw Sockets
are not clearly mentioned in that link . Any ideas ?
1) TCP data cannot be sent over raw sockets.
But why ?

2) A call to the bind function with a raw socket is not allowed.
But why ? Any ideas ?

But, the below reason w.r.t raw socket & UDP datagram
support is clear -
3) UDP datagrams with an invalid source address cannot be sent
over raw sockets. The IP source address for any outgoing UDP
datagram must exist on a network interface or the datagram is
dropped. This change was made to limit the ability of malicious
code to create distributed denial-of-service attacks and limits the
ability to send spoofed packets (TCP/IP packets with a forged
source IP address).

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru
Ads