Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off. Despite him stating many times, nobody can quote any lies
written by him. I just did, right he
Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp
On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
*** end copy
From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews -
www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:
I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try
to not sink to their level.
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Not there.
Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Not there.
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores
Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores
121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.
Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.
*** end share
So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G
Here's another one ROFL!:
Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Please note.
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:05:53 -0700
Message-ID:
References:
On 5/7/20 9:36 PM, Diesel wrote:
.....
Now you go and find some old source code you don't understand and ask
for Snits advice concerning it? The idiot didn't even realize what
you were asking about and provided you no answer.
Ah, more trolling of me by you. So more reminding you of your past
nonsense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Diesel F08TPFtT157gyFB5:
-----
Snit, if you're running the bot you have an easy way out
that won't cost you any respect, face, or anything else.
Just stop. That's it. Simple right?
-----
The last time the bot had posted was more than three hours before.
Diesel made it clear he could find the IP of the person running the bot.
And he made it clear it would be easy for him to make a Sandman-like
time table of posting, but showing Carroll and the bot and myself.
Was he lying when he said that? Maybe. But I do not think so. And if he
was merely lying he would not have access to the program itself, which
he makes VERY clear he did.
Diesel and Carroll were trolling together. The bot goes silent. Diesel
then says if the bot is just turned off he will let it slide. Does that
sound like Diesel to you? And he also say this:
-----
It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously **** poor
example of writing software.
-----
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but
to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely
the compiled code he had:
-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----
So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess:
he will NEVER say.
*** end copy
I've repeatedly asked you to backup the statements you wrote
concerning my involvement with the floodbot. Not one single time
have you even so much as attempted to do so. Questions again:
I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had
access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output -
atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more
information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and
finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the
"compiled code".
Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short
paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come
close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation. And
then we have the issue of the question you asked at the end. That
question makes the assumption that what you wrote previous to it is
factual - The question is intended to give credence to what's
written previous to it, to give it credibility. To assist in your
effort to mislead. Which is incidently, a form of manipulation,
Snit.
--
NUMBER CRUNCHING: Jumping on a Computer.