Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:47:52 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:
Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off.
If you could understand what you read you would have known I have
been very clear David asked me to check the numbers on the site he
pointed to.
What's to misunderstand by this?
Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp
On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
*** end copy
I wrote that David asked you to check that number against phonebook
urls, and he clearly did. And, you attempted to do as he requested.
So there was no direct or even so much as an indirect lie by me, as
you claimed above. So, you lied on me (again) and you owe me an
apology for the lie you wrote there, Snit.
Here's David doing what you claimed I directly lied about
:
From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews -
www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Not there.
Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Not there.
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores
Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores
121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.
Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.
*** end share
So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G
Well, Snit, an apology is clearly in order. When do you expect you'll be able to swallow enough pride down to admit you made a mistake here?
Or, will you try to weasel around it as you've continued doing with the bot accusation you made against me?
Just how dishonest are you, snit?
You just were playing victim.
Catching you lying on me, again, is not my playing victim. It's
holding you accountable, and you might as well get used to the idea.
But
Nothing. You *lied* again, and this time, there's nothing for you to
use to even try confusing people. An apology is in order, snit. You
owe me an apology for lying about me here. I want that apology for
the direct lie you claim I made that I did NOT make. Your own words,
directly accusing me of something which was NOT true.
Now, you have to admit you ****ed up, and apologize. It's the right
thing to do. You can no longer claim 'unquotable lies'; because I
quoted you, straight up, lying about me, and I backed up my claim by
sharing Davids and yours discussion doing exactly what I wrote about
him asking you to do, and you doing for him, just as I wrote. There
was no direct lie on my part, at any point in time.
[diversion of your lies snipped]
Can you understand that?
Can you understand that I caught you in a direct lie this time that
you can't even try passing off as a misunderstanding?
You owe me an apology.
Remember: I already taught you how you can test your claims --
recreate the situation: work out a time with me to call me again
from another burner number. Wait a day to see if it shows up in
the logs. If you find a DIFFERENT way maybe it will not, but if
you do it the same way it almost surely will.
I didn't call you from a burner the first time, as I've taken a
great amount of time to explain to your quite stupid ass,
previously. What part of voIP isn't clear to you? the vo or IP?
Simple troubleshooting -- but beyond your skills.
You're projecting your own shortcomings onto me, yet again. It's
amusing, considering how easy it is for me to prove that's the case
here. A recent Joel inability to burn an audio cd so he hoses the os
is a fine example of that. I can find the post where I asked
technical support questions, as any professional would. I cannot
find a single post where you so much as tried. I can find the post
where I asked if yuo agreed with joels repair methodology; to hose
the system and reload another os. you said that was a good idea. It
wasn't, because if the issue comes up again, joel has no idea how it
happened and no idea how to fix it, aside from OS reloading. That's
not something a professional technician does as their first option
for such a situation. I can find hundreds of posts, more likely
thousands though were i'm involved in very technical discussions and
offering useful assistance, ranging from an actual virus infection
to non malicious software and hardware troubleshooting issues, snit.
Anytime you want to setup a troubleshooting contest, lemme know;
We'll do it stupid easy, with the basics of the basic **** here.
We'll setup a circuit simulator with a known ****ing problem and see
which of the first, if both even do, find it and correct the issue.
I bet you fail miserably. Any takers?
--
He's dead Jim. Grab his tricorder. I'll get his wallet.