Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 22:08:19 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Aug 22, 2020 at 2:36:00 PM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:
Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:47:52
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:
Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying
his arse off.
If you could understand what you read you would have known I
have been very clear David asked me to check the numbers on the
site he pointed to.
What's to misunderstand by this?
You really fail to understand everything you read.
I don't see how I could have possibly misunderstood what you wrote, he
Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp
On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
*** end copy
Snit, isn't that exactly what David asked you to do for him? And
isn't that what you've been doing for him? Why yes, yes it is. So,
how and in what possible way was I lying about this, Snit? When you
can't back your statements up, and in this case, you can't - it's
probably best not to try and stick with your totally bull**** claim.
Instead, you should be doing the right thing, manning up, and
apologizing for writing what you did about me - Nothing you've
published so far about me has been true.
What you've been running away from in the last two replies you've
provided in this thread. You clearly went out of your way to lie
about me, again, and now, you're backpeddling about what you did,
again. I really don't see how you think you can convince anyone that
you didn't lie on me, yet again, just because you can.
Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp
On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
*** end copy
I wrote that David asked you to check that number against phonebook
urls, and he clearly did. And, you attempted to do as he requested.
So there was no direct or even so much as an indirect lie by me, as
you claimed above. So, you lied on me (again) and you owe me an
apology for the lie you wrote there, Snit.
Here's David doing what you claimed I directly lied about
:
From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews -
www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Not there.
Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Not there.
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores
Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores
121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.
Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.
*** end share
So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G Just keep denying
things took place as the timeline and myself are clearly showing
they did. Even Google's view of this thread backs me up and calls
you out for the liar you are regarding this entire conversation.
It's all right here in this very thread. You denying David asking
you to do something for him, twice.
You trying to blame your lie on a bogus reading comprehension issue
you want so much for me to be diagnosed with; so that we have
something in common; that's how desperate you are to be accepted by
those with far more knowledge than yourself. You really are, that
pathetic. Especially in this case, lying your arse off as you're
continuing to duck and dodge around the apology you owe me.
Anything to avoid admission of your mistakes. The delays you've
provided say a ****load about you and those who are responsible for
raising you. They did a **** poor job of things, clearly, a ****
poor job of things.
Well, Snit, an apology is clearly in order. When do you expect
you'll be able to swallow enough pride down to admit you made a
mistake here? Or, will you try to weasel around it as you've
continued doing with the bot accusation you made against me?
Just how dishonest are you, snit? It's a rhetorical question,
simplesnit. I have a very good idea how dishonest you actually are
now. Willing to lie about the smallest of things doesn't bestow
much trust in you. And despite your claims to the contrary, you did
infact LIE on me again when you claimed I wrote a direct lie about
what David and yourself have been doing. I didn't.
You flat out, straight up, lied your ass off here. As you're more
than willing to lie about this, what else would you lie about with
ease? Oh yes, a phone log. You'd go so far to complete the lie that
you'd dr the evidence to support it. It's really No different than
what you're doing with your replies in this thread.
Remember, I already acknowledged he pointed me to a couple web
searches to see if your number was there
So, there's no question about then, you knew you were lying as you wrote this:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp
On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
*** end copy
You straight up knew for a fact prior to you having writing that
reply that it was a lie; and you went and wrote it anyway. Why do
you make the decision to intentionally be as dishonest as you are?
AFTER YOU TOLD HIM I HAD YOUR NUMBER.
You made it perfectly clear to him you had an alternate way of
reaching me. And I suspect you knew David likes to read between the
lines, so you left him a large line to follow.
Ahh, so when you wrote this:
Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp
On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
*** end copy
You were fully aware of the fact you were lying the entire time,
that I didn't write a direct lie as you claimed, nor did I write an
indirect lie. I didn't lie at all, by your own admission; you did
and you're trying to avoid taking responsibility for what you wrote,
yet again.
Remember, I did not even mention that, nor even tell him or anyone
in any group you are spamming that you called me.
Snit, I already explained what you did, by accident that one
particular case. You chose to ignore what I told you, but that
doesn't make what I told you about this go away or cease to exist.
It simply means, as with other things, you chose to ignore it and
play stupid. Only, the more I interact with you, the less likely I
find it to be that you're playing.
Please TRY to understand what you read...
I understand what I read just fine. There's no way in which for me to have misunderstood this:
Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp
On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
*** end copy
At no time was it ever a direct, or indirect for that matter lie
from me. He did infact do such things, and you just recently
admitted to knowing about it before you wrote the post accusing me
of lying about it. There's no reading issue here, no
misunderstanding. What happened is quite simple, you lied your ass
off (again) about me, with NOTHING to support what you claim
happened.
But there is evidence which supports what I said you and David have
done: As well as your own admission that He'd already asked for your
help by the time you got around to writing the lie you did again
about me. What's funny is that you actually think you can get away
with it.
Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp
On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.
This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.
*** end copy
I wrote that David asked you to check that number against phonebook
urls, and he clearly did. And, you attempted to do as he requested.
So there was no direct or even so much as an indirect lie by me, as
you claimed above. So, you lied on me (again) and you owe me an
apology for the lie you wrote there, Snit.
Here's David doing what you claimed I directly lied about
:
From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews -
www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Not there.
Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?
https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores
Not there.
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores
Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
OK. Thanks for looking.
Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores
121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.
Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.
*** end share
So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G
Well, Snit, an apology is clearly in order. When do you expect
you'll be able to swallow enough pride down to admit you made a
mistake here? Or, will you try to weasel around it as you've
continued doing with the bot accusation you made against me?
Just how dishonest are you, snit?
You are not the victim you think you are.
I'm not claiming to be any such thing. Continued attempts to avoid
and project have been noted though.
--
Useless Invention: Blinker Fluid.