kurttrail wrote:
Michael Stevens wrote:

kurttrail wrote:
Michael Stevens wrote:
No need to quote the entire thread, I did say "ruling"[my mistake],
but I was expressing I didn't agree to your assessment of Title 17,
Chapter 117 of the quoted copyright law. I have not seen a ruling
that supports your definition of the preceding, and I don't see how
you come to your conclusion.

Have you seen a court ruling that is contrary to my opinion? If you
have, let me know!


Same here, have you seen one that is contrary to my opinion?

How a copy created for archive purposes
can be used for multiple installs;

Where does Section 117 mention archival, Mike?


Absolutely I see where archival is mentioned, and I don't agree with the
part before the "or" either.
You always ignore this part.
"or other transfer of all rights in the program. Adaptations so prepared may
be transferred only with the authorization of the copyright owner."
It does not define "utilization of the computer program" as a license to
install on as many computers as you like.

Just don't see the need to answer any more of your details. I can't see how
you get the "CORE MEANING" out of what I read from the same source.

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/1...html?DB=uscode
--

Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP

http://michaelstevenstech.com
For a better newsgroup experience. Setup a newsreader.
http://michaelstevenstech.com/outloo...snewreader.htm