On 20/10/2019 13.02, nospam wrote:
In article , Carlos E.R.
wrote:


Djvu is better suited than PDF for scanned text.

not really. it can compress smaller, but size isn't an issue.

PDF wins because it is
popular, and because djvu is difficult to generate,

those are two *very* good reasons, plus pdf can do *much* more than
djvu can.

Maybe, but the point is that djvu is much better for some uses, yet very
few people use it. That PDF can do more is irrelevant.


but technically,
djvu is better for that purpose.

not enough to justify using it.

For me, it is. For the people that know the advantages, it is.


--
Cheers, Carlos.