View Single Post
  #24  
Old September 12th 19, 10:19 PM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.os.linux,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Ping Pong
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Why Linux On Desktop Failed: A Discussion With Mark Shuttleworth

chrisv wrote in
:

Mr. Hand wrote:

On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:03:32 -0500, chrisv
wrote:

Mr. Hand wrote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Linux

And there are many others.
How you can deny this is laughable.

You focus only on those who are critical.


No.
I made a statement that you claim was untrue.
I offered proof.


No you didn't.

Have you ever seen a trial? The prosecution doesn't "offer
proof". They present "evidence". You presented some evidence,
supporting one side of the debate. In a trial, the other side
gets to present evidence, also.

Every group has some assholes. I could present evidence that
Steve Jobs was an asshole. Does that mean that he has a "bad
reputation"? No, it does not.

You offered insults.


Yet another lie, from you. I will read no further.

In truth, it is you who offered insults.

It is you who offered unsupported claims. When challenged, you
lamely responded that I should go-around asking a ****-load of
people what they thought Linux is.

Do you think that you being so unreasonable gets you off the
hook? You made the claims, your job to support them, buddy.

You're just yet another asshole who pulls **** out of his ass
and insults decent people. Then, when someone objects, you
claim that they proved your point (I'm sure that you will again
do so, in response to this post). When it's clear that you are
beaten, you attack with idiocy and lies.

(snipped, unread)



You are being trolled by snit sock puppets.
There are several in this thread.

Mr Hand is just another snit sock puppet.

Key phrase:lashing out.
It's a snit phrase.
Ads