On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:14:16 -0700, T wrote:

On 9/12/19 10:06 AM, chrisv wrote:
T wrote:

(snip)

What, you just copy and paste the same stuff that your wrote earlier?

Here's my response.




Your response is an eMail address?

Bro, do you even compute?

200 news.astraweb.com NNRP Service Ready (posting ok) (fx34.iad) (yEnc
enabled).
381 PASS required
281 Welcome to usenetxs.com (Posting Allowed)
article
220 0
Path: not-for-mail
From: chrisv
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Why Linux On Desktop Failed: A Discussion With Mark
Shuttleworth
Message-ID:
References: qlccfj$g6o$1@dont-
email.me
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:49:23 UTC
Organization: fastusenet - www.fastusenet.org
Bytes: 1607
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:49:23 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1658
X-Received-Body-CRC: 98773473

T wrote:

The user does not give a s*** what OS he is using. He
only cares if his programs work. And Windows owns
the program base. From the user's point of view, if
his Quick Books and his Turbotax does not work, then
the OS does not work. He does not care why.

Many people have no need of such special applications.

Also, as the years progress, more and more applications become
browser-based, making it less and less important what OS is being
used.

Linux's desktop have come into their own. There
are several that are very well done and much better
than Windows 10. Linux need to concentrate on taking
over the install base of software.

The Linux community is already doing what it should be doing.

Obviously, it would be ridiculous to suggest that they could keep-up,
in applications, with the 40X larger Windows ecosystem.

--
"If we're even mildly critical of GNU/Linux, we're liars and trolls."
- "Slimer", lying shamelessly
..


--
-v | Two-time winner of the Checky™.