On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 01:35:42 -0000, nospam wrote:
In article , William Gothberg
wrote:
figure 4:
http://www.storagemojo.com/wp-conten..._temp_age_dist.
png
That would be
http://www.storagemojo.com/wp-conten...p_age_dist.png
nope. it would be as i posted, properly delimited with .
You don't need . Any newsreader that actually snaps a word (or URL) in half is very badly designed. If you're going to insist on this outdated 70 characters per line ****, it shouldn't include single words (or URLs).
your version will break when quoted. that's bad.
Funny, it didn't. It's still in one piece above.
Otherwise I get "This page isnšt working, storagemojo.com redirected you too
many times."
then your newsreader doesn't properly handle urls. it's broken.
Don't wrap links please.
i didn't wrap anything. whatever wrapping you saw or problems you
encountered were entirely at your end, by your software.
Bull****, my wrapping is turned off, I think you'll find it's your 70 char per line limit.
get a better newsreader, one which complies with the relevant rfcs and
doesn't wrap or break links.
**** the rules, use logic. As I said above, but you seem to want to break my post into several parts and repeat yourself, you do not need to wrap the URL in the first place. The is a workaround for a ****ed newsreader.
do not expect others to alter links because you choose to use ****ty
software.
Are you Rod Speed? On and on stating the same thing over and over, I get the picture.....