"w_tom" wrote in news:1163364032.185165.292470
@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:

Leythos wrote:
interesting to see that you've changed your message to state "sub-$100"
instead of just UPS, as it appears you learned from your mistake in the
past.

I have not changed anything. We were always discussing what DanS has
now described as a sub-$100 UPS - also known as a computer grade UPS or
what most everyone has when they use UPSes.

That is correct, $80 - $100'ish UPS's was the subject, but the subject was
NOT specifically about lighting protection, you turned it into that one and
continue to twist words and fail to acknowledge any counterpoints what-so-
ever, no matter how valid they are.