T wrote:
On 05/02/2015 12:33 PM, . . .winston wrote:
T wrote:
On 04/29/2015 07:22 PM, . . .winston wrote:
The Appeals Court, not the Bush admin reversed the 'break-up' decision.
- one might say you're pi$$ed at the wrong person or group of
persons.

Hi Winston,

True, but the Bush administration folded and did not take it
up to the Supreme court, who also doesn't know the difference
between judiciary vs. legislative responsibility.

-T

Would have been sent back in a heartbeat without the need to hear a word
from either side.

So the judge screwed up that bad? And because of it, we are all
blessed with a monopoly. We would be a good 15 years ahead in
software development ...

Don't guess if we had a time machine we could get the AT&T
break up judge?

:'(

No monopoly conviction

ATT was an entirely different reason.

Keep fishing, you might find that acorn eventually.


--
...winston
msft mvp consumer apps