View Single Post
  #5  
Old August 22nd 09, 03:21 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web
Uolricus te Erlake
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default small network is all fouled up ...

Well this isn't entirely clear. There's a 50-foot cable between the two
routers, and, initially, I wanted a wireless link, but, having now routed a
cable between office and lab, I merely want to use the added ports on the
second router. If that's using it as a switch, that's now now it's
configured. However, the problem persists. I have disabled the downstream
router's DHCP, so, presumably, the first router will distribute NAT
addresses.

Is that what I should have done?


"Malke" wrote in message
...
Uolricus te Erlake wrote:

I have two routers and a cable modem with several computers. However,
the
machine colocated with the cable modem can't "see" the ones downstream,
though they can "see" (at least PING) it. I thought I set up the network
identically on each machine but don't even have a network access icon in
the taskbar on that one machine.

None of the machines "see" each other in Network Neighborhood, nor do
they
"see" what's in their workgroup. They have, of course, been assigned to
the same workgroup.


Why do you have two routers? If you have two routers, I would expect the
results to be exactly as they are - two separate networks.

If what you really want the second router for is more wireless coverage,
you
need to turn off DHCP on one of the routers and turn it into a wireless
access point instead or if wireless isn't desired disable that capability
in
the router as well as DHCP and just use it as a switch.

Then all machines will be on the same network and can share
files/printers.

Malke
--
MS-MVP
Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ



Ads