Thread: 3.5 floppy
View Single Post
  #42  
Old November 16th 17, 07:16 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Andy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 645
Default 3.5 floppy

That is correct Ant


--
AL'S COMPUTERS
"Ant" wrote in message
...
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote:
In message , Paul
writes:
[]
If you read the Wikipedia article on floppy, you'll
find there are plenty of variants. Interworking is
not a property of them.

In some cases, it's actually media differences. The magnetic properties


I remember even seeing a hard-sectored 5.25" floppy. (Most such had one
hole in the index track: it synched an oscillator when it passed the
sensor in the index hole, and other sectors were when a certain time had
passed. This one had multiple holes.
aren't the same (from the various eras). The same thing happened


I don't remember that, other than the difference between low-density
(360K for 5.25", 720 for 3.5", for IBM PC use) and high (1.2M and 1.44M
on IBM PCs). [The 3.5" floppies had an extra hole in the case, for the
higher density IIRR; the 5.25" ones didn't.] For machines other than PCs
(Amstrad, BBC, Commodore, ...), I think it was mostly a
layout-of-sectors (and index [directory] structures) rather than actual
magnetic variation, though I guess there might have been some such.


IIRC, 3.5" disks could do 2.88 MB but I think it used compression to do
that?
--
Quote of the Week: "I go out of my way to avoid stepping on ants." --Terry
McGovern, daughter of Senator George and Eleanor McGovern, subject of the
book "Terry by her father"
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see
this signature correctly.
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit-
( ) ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.



Ads