David_B
Mon, 11 May 2020 11:37:12 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 10/05/2020 23:12, Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2020 23:02:26 +0100, David_B
wrote:

On 10/05/2020 22:39, Your Name wrote:

I wouldn't be installing an AV anyway ... like all
anti-malware, it's completely pointless on a Mac.

I agree.

Message-ID:

*LIAR*
Follow the thread.
He not only obtains a crack for the commercial software from
a
fellow crook and uses it, but worse, offers it to others. When
they decline, he says he was "testing if they were honest".
He'll claim he "forgot". He probably did.
Alcohol in excess can do that to the brain.
[]'s

PS: One of his stalking_target's name was altered to an
AV.
He tries to feed the bots with negative posts. It did not alter
the meaning of the post in any way.

I have no idea why you are responding to *ME*, Shadow.

Are you drinking heavily, David?

You appear to 'have a screw loose'. You have recently claimed that
you are currently using a computer running Windows XP and have
*NO* anti-virus software installed. The chances of YOU having had
a rootkit installed on your machine - without your knowledge - are
exceptionally high.

David, you really have no experience or knowledge of the subject of
any kind to make such a claim.

This post refers http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=158919690900

Please explain to 'Your Name' why you incessantly claim that
alcohol plays a part in my posting when you know full well that
I've imbibed NO alcohol since I stopped drinking completely on
21st March 2018

I seriously doubt Shadow has any better access to your inner circle
than myself. And, I have seen no such confirmation from anyone that
reached out to me previously about this so called, sobriety you've
claimed. Two years, and I haven't heard a word about it. I don't
believe you're telling any of us the truth here, as a result, David.

And quit with the known to be bull**** lie of yours that I'm lying
about this. You're all too quick to forget, you confirmed my
statements are true, by telling me your side of a story I shouldn't
know anything about. I'll also remind you that you falsely accused
me of hacking one or more of your computers and stealing one or more
files to learn of your drinking issues. I did no such thing, but I
did ask if you kept a journal or diary or something; it's the only
thing I could think of that would make you ask such a question.

Your responses to my claim that I was put in contact with one or more
people you actually know in real life confirmed my 'story' was true,
that it wasn't a lie, or otherwise false as you've tried to claim
since you ****ed up and told me your side of the story about the loss
of a friendship due to your drinking problem. I couldn't possibly
know anything about that, nothing at all about that, if one or more
people you know personally who are familiar with the incident didn't
tell me all about it, David.

I've asked you several times to explain how I know things I
shouldn't, but you continue to dodge that question too. Why? You told
on yourself, already. If you just denied everything I'd written, and
kept your mouth shut about that friendship - I'd have no way of
proving any of it was true without forking over my source(s). You
saved me the trouble by telling on yourself. You let your ego get the
best of you, you couldn't just let what I wrote stand, YOU HAD TO
TELL ME YOUR SIDE. And, heh, by doing so, you confirmed what I'd
written is true. And, you also confirmed you were in damage control
mode, but it was already too late. Cats out of the bag, drunkard.

Mike Easter doesn't believe your sober, David. He recently asked if
you'd been drinking again. You ignored him just as you have Apd,
Shadow, myself, and others. No David, snits method of dealing with
people isn't working. He's just as despised as you are, possibly more
so. And! One reason is shared between you; you're both very well
known liars. Seriously, both of you, well known for this.

Snit isn't who you think he is, David. Your reputation is bad enough
without aligning yourself with that learning disabled, severely
compromised, hardly literate, idiot.

Also, I've read some other most interesting posts from snit
concerning those degrees. He at one point, denied he claimed had
either of them, and someone just made the assumption. I can actually
find the MIDs if you'd like to see this stuff. It is old news,
several years old infact, but, quite interesting.

Do you remember me telling you that for the masters degree he's
supposed to have, even with the differences in the one I have, some
of the material is cross over? Well, he should know/have a solid
understanding of a lot more technical subject matter; especially
coding than he's shown he has, here, David. There's no ****ing way he
was able to acquire either degree with the demonstrated, no doubt, no
question, no excuse, reading comprehension problem he has. It's a
real life learning disability. You expect people to believe he earned
a masters degree in information technology but couldn't follow the
plain english text explanation of the AZ format? David, I assure you,
any degree in information technology and/or computer science has a
lot of reading material which goes along with it, not even including
lab time where you put what you're learning to real world use. That
material is MUCH MORE complicated than any source code I've shared
here, or documentation I've shared, ever thought about being.

Some of the material, despite you never actually using it in the real
world (much like school) gets uber geeky, and again, I stress,
requires a reading comprehension level higher than one's necessary to
understand the AZ format as I described it. Even you can't deny, Snit
struggled considerably more than someone with the college/university
background he's supposed to have, should.

If he has those degrees, someone assisted him with the work material
itself. He didn't do it entirely on his own, and, that's IF he wasn't
lying about having them in the first place. Several usenet posts from
him seem to indicate his idea of not lying about them was to not
correct others who assumed he had one or more, based on what he
wrote.

In my case, I've directly asked him, when I was communicating with
him and he's on record for telling us he does have a Masters Degree
in information technology. Which contradicts several , years old,
usenet posts on the subject where he claims he has no such degrees,
that he didn't say he did, that others incorrect assumed based on
things he wrote.

Do you see a possible issue with all of this David? Can you explain
for me how Snit could have a masters degree in information
technology, teach classes etc as he's claimed, yet do so badly with a
very simple explanation for AZ? If that example won't suffice, can
you explain why he hasn't answered you about that source code you
asked for his input on? It's not like you shared the source code by
accident, you did want him to take a peek and see if he could help
you figure it out, right?

And before snit worries or accuses me of something else, falsely, he
is filtered here on this network. None of the computers on said
network will show me any posts from him via my client. That being
said, a couple of usenetters do seem to think it necessary that I
read some of his posts, so they email me copies; but they aren't
cherry picking content on me, I'm getting the entire post with
headers. They might be cherry picking the posts themselves though, as
they all know it annoys me when they send one, and they risk being
put in the spam folder if they aren't careful.

Your stupidity concerning the machine in front of you is
understandable to a point, but, Snit has made various claims of being
techieish in nature (if that's a new word, I call first dibs on
credit) so.. I have trouble excusing a lot of what he writes, atleast
that which I've had the misfortune of seeing come up on my screen.

David, one more thing about snit. He's posted several times an
accusation that I have the usenet flood bot source code, or a binary
to it, or access to it's owner; as in, I know who's running it. I
don't, and I told him that several times. I also explained how I
reached my thoughts concerning how the bot is coded based on what
I've seen it doing. Same as I did with his. If he really has the
technical background and education he claims, David, he should be
very familiar with the methods I described. Infact, he should be so
familiar with them, I shouldn't have had to explain myself, and he
wouldn't have accused me of anything to do with the bot code/binary
wise, at all. He might have still accused me of knowing who ran it,
but, not an accusation of having a copy of it in any form, simply by
my diagnosing how it works from seeing it's output. That's forgive
the pun, basic coding skills. And you have to have atleast basic
coding ability in a variety of languages to get a masters degree. You
don't get to skip that part by choosing IT over CS. You still have to
do that class work too - but with IT, you only have to go over the
basics. What you are taught though, should have covered what I had to
explain to snit I'd done!

There's several things, other than what I already described that's
off about him, David. Trust him completely if you like, but, you can
fact check everything I've written with other real technicians you do
trust. You can also fact check my claims about his old posts, by
reading a few of the threads here and cola. if you don't want to wait
for me to fork them over. Or, snit could just, I dunno, be honest
with everyone here concerning what they do have/don't and do/don't
know. I won't hold it against them, I couldn't think much lower of
them than I already do. My scale doesn't go below zero. G

I've already dismissed him as a generally useless, intentionally
lying, troll. Your kind of person. Pcbutts beats him only because,
despite pcbutts being a code thief from hell, he actually had a
general idea of what the code did that he took credit for writing
when he didn't. Snit can't even reliably demonstrate that level of
understanding.


--
And they shall plow their swords into beach chairs.