But what does any of this have to do with Bruce
Chambers oft-repeated but bogus claim that one wouldn't be in compliance
with "COPYRIGHT LAWS" for installing software on more than one computer!
If he would just say that one would not be in compliance with the EULA,
that would be the truth, though that still wouldn't mean that a court
would actually enforce it on individuals, if MS ever grew the balls to
actually enforce their EULA on individuals by legal means thru the court
system, but that's Contract Law. Bruce, or anyone else, has never found
one US copyright law that an individual would not be in compliance with
when installing the same copy of software on more than one computer!

Or do you condone his repeatedly posting 218 times that which nobody has
been able to prove, because there are no existing US copyright laws that
prohibits an individual from installing the same copy of software on
more than one computer?!

Or is that how you MS-MVP's earn your free MSDN subscriptions by
misrepresenting the truth for MS?!

Or don't you know how to answer a question to begin with?

--
Kurtis Kirsch
[I bet Jupiter still ignores answering this valid post! Complaining
about my sig, instead of try to counter my valid points, and to avoid
answering my questions!]